Training of Patients With Hip Fracture

NCT ID: NCT01174589

Last Updated: 2014-08-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of this study is to illustrate whether there is a difference in the 6 minutes walking test in patients with hip fractures who have received 6 vs. 12 weeks of physical training after discharge from hospital.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

6 weeks of physical training

The 6 weeks of physical training consists of muscle strength training of both legs, balance and coordination exercises 2 times a week.

Group Type OTHER

Strength training

Intervention Type OTHER

to compare if there is a difference between 6 or 12 weeks of physical strength training

12 weeks of physical exercise

The 12 weeks of physical training consists of muscle strength training of both legs, balance and coordination exercises 2 times a week.

Group Type OTHER

Strength training

Intervention Type OTHER

to compare if there is a difference between 6 or 12 weeks of physical strength training

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Strength training

to compare if there is a difference between 6 or 12 weeks of physical strength training

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with hip fractures
* full weightbearing on the affected leg
* patients living in their own home with an independent walking ability score \>=2 according to the New Mobility Score scale
* written consent

Exclusion Criteria

* institutionalized patients
* more than 2 weeks after discharge from hospital
* non weight bearing on the affected leg
* Dementia
* other conditions/diagnosis that would have an effect on the ability to train eg. neurological diagnosis
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Association of Danish Physiotherapists

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lolland Community, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mr. Jan Overgaard

Physiotherapist, Bachelor, Sector of Health, Rehabilitation, Lolland Community.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan Overgaard, MSc.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sector of health, rehabilitation, Lolland community, Denmark

Morten T Kristensen, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Physical Therapy and Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital at Hvidovre, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maribo Health Center

Maribo, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fairhall NJ, Dyer SM, Mak JC, Diong J, Kwok WS, Sherrington C. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 7;9(9):CD001704. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36070134 (View on PubMed)

Overgaard JA, Kallemose T, Mangione KK, Kristensen MT. Six Versus 12 Weeks of Outpatient Physical Therapy Including Progressive Resistance Training in Cognitively Intact Older Adults After Hip Fracture: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Jul 5;77(7):1455-1462. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab256.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34460897 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SJ-145

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

'Rehabilitation for Life'
NCT04424186 COMPLETED NA
Bracing After Ankle Fracture
NCT07163091 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA