Preliminary Review of Cold and Active Compression Therapy for Traumatic Calcaneus or Ankle Fractures

NCT ID: NCT02498717

Last Updated: 2018-02-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-03

Study Completion Date

2017-07-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will examine the initial efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using the cryocompression therapy model both pre-operatively and post-operatively in patients that have recently suffered a traumatic calcaneus or ankle fracture compared to the standard pre-operative RICE therapy procedures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Initial research has shown that cryocompression therapy applied post-operatively has been effective in reducing recovery time and improving health and pain factors related to patient recovery. However, there has been limited research into how this translates into positive economic outcomes for both the hospital and the patient. In addition, it can be reasonably hypothesized that the use of the cryocompression therapy system before surgery will lead to an increased rate of reduction in swelling necessary to allow proper operative procedures to take place when compared to the standard ice and elevation (RICE) therapy techniques and cryocompression therapy applied only post-operatively. This should lead to decreased hospital costs and possible improved patient outcomes related to recovery.

Study Objectives This study will examine the initial efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using the cryocompression therapy model both pre-operatively and post-operatively in patients that have recently suffered a traumatic calcaneus or ankle fracture compared to the standard pre-operative RICE therapy procedures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ankle Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RICE (control)

Standard of Care procedures including ice and elevation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RICE

Intervention Type OTHER

SOC ice and elevation

Cryocompression (experimental)

treatment using the GameReady cryotherapy system

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

GameReady

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cryotherapy and compression

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GameReady

Cryotherapy and compression

Intervention Type DEVICE

RICE

SOC ice and elevation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients over 18 years of age
2. Able to provide informed consent
3. Recent calcaneus or ankle fracture requiring fixation
4. Injury is determined (by physician) to be an isolated, closed, low-energy bimalleolar fracture

Exclusion Criteria

1. Unable to provide informed consent
2. History of Dementia or mental instability
3. No recent additional fractures (within one year) at or around injury site
4. Persons with symptoms of any kind of psychosocial disorder
5. Any condition that the clinician feels would contraindicate for the postoperative test or control treatments
6. Any conditions that would contraindicate using the Game Ready
7. If the patient is prevented from transfer to the OR due to reasons other than medically necessary
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cool Systems, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

AdventHealth

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brian Vickaryous, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AdventHealth

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Florida Hospital

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

539147

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bracing After Ankle Fracture
NCT07163091 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA