Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy
NCT ID: NCT06086223
Last Updated: 2023-10-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
176 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-11-01
2026-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Operative Versus Non Operative Treatment for Unstable Ankle Fractures
NCT00336752
Arthroscopic Assisted Open Reduction Internal Fixation Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation in Ankle Fractures
NCT03084263
A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study to Compare Open Versus Percutaneous Syndesmosis Repair of Unstable Ankle Fractures
NCT02245893
Comparison of the Results of Complex Ankle Fractures Treated With and Without Ankle Arthroscopy
NCT02449096
Ankle Fracture vs Ankle Fracture-Dislocation
NCT02198768
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1-mm of lateral talar shift lead to a 42% increase in contact stress, so the anatomic reduction is critical to the long-term integrity of the joint . It is difficult to assess 1 to 2 mm of mal-reduction with C-arm fluoroscopy. The best assessment of the syndesmotic reduction is performed with axial CT imaging of the ankle.
Ankle arthroscopy is expected to be a more sensitive tool for syndesmotic disruption diagnosis and other intra-articular pathologies and as a guide for anatomical reduction of the syndesmosis . Several studies have reported the incidence of chondral lesions seen during ankle arthroscopy at the time of ankle fracture ORIF, but those studies report the role of arthroscopy as a diagnostic or predictive tool for patient outcome. Very few studies have discussed the rates of arthroscopic intervention, the procedures performed, and the association of these procedures with patient final functional outcomes .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The sample size was calculated using G\*power software 3.1.9.7., based on the following assumptions: the patient satisfaction rate was higher in those patients who underwent arthroscopy compared with ORIF alone (93% vs 75%, P ¼ .05) (5).
Main statistical test is z test, Alpha = 0.05, Power = 0.95 Allocation ratio= 1.
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
those patients who will go for ORIF plus arthroscopy
we will start with a standard ankle arthroscopy. A leg holder and ankle joint distractor will be used. We will start with the anteromedial portal and introduce the 4-mm scope into the ankle joint. Next, under direct visualization, and taking care to preserve any branches of the superficial peroneal nerve, we will perform the anterolateral portal.
We will carry out a standard diagnostic ankle arthroscopy to evaluate the ankle cartilage, wash intra-articular haematoma, identify, and remove any intra-articular fracture fragments and loose bodies, perform dynamic ligamentous stress examinations while directly visualizing the syndesmosis, the deltoid ligament, and the lateral collateral ligament.
Following fracture fixation, arthroscopy will be also used as a second look to evaluate the quality of both articular and syndesmotic reduction, perform any needed arthroscopic intervention for deltoid ligament injury or management of chondral lesions (OCLs)
ankle arthroscopy with ORIF
we will go for fixation of the fracture with association of scope intervention pre and post fixation
patients who will go for ORIF without arthroscopy
* Posterior malleolus fractures will be addressed when it is present whatever its size.
* The fibula fractures will be fixated using either a posterolateral or direct lateral incision. Lag screws will be used when the fracture pattern allows, and all fractures will be also treated with a neutralization or antiglide plate depending on the pattern and approach.
* If a medial malleolus fracture is present, this will be addressed through a direct medial incision. These fractures will be either fixed with cannulated screws or tension band cerclage wiring or a plate and screw construct depending on the fracture pattern.
* Once all bony injuries will be stabilized, a Cotton test will be performed under live fluoroscopy to determine syndesmosis stability. If positive, the syndesmosis will be stabilized using fully threaded screws.
fracture ankle fixation without ankle arthroscopy
we will go for fixation of the fracture alone with no scope intervention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ankle arthroscopy with ORIF
we will go for fixation of the fracture with association of scope intervention pre and post fixation
fracture ankle fixation without ankle arthroscopy
we will go for fixation of the fracture alone with no scope intervention
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* rotational ankle fracture Danis-Weber classification B or C fibula fracture
* fracture dislocation ankle
* Fractures extending into the tibial plafond,
* Talus fractures (body or neck) in our institution
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
El-Taher Alaa Eldin Ahmed Eid
Principle investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Smith KS, Drexelius K, Challa S, Moon DK, Metzl JA, Hunt KJ. Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2020 Mar 2;5(1):2473011420904046. doi: 10.1177/2473011420904046. eCollection 2020 Jan.
Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, van Dijk CN. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Feb;18(2):238-46. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0942-6. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Arthroscopy for ankle fracture
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.