Effect of Lumbar Manipulation on Intervertebral Motion, Pain, and Disability

NCT ID: NCT06294132

Last Updated: 2024-03-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-27

Study Completion Date

2024-10-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background / Purpose:

There is an ongoing debate regarding the ability of physical therapists to manually sense intervertebral motion. Physical therapists use intervertebral hypomobility as a clinical indicator for spinal manipulation. Also in question is the mechanism of improvement observed after spinal manipulation. Some argue that the improvement is purely neurophysiologic and unrelated to changes in intervertebral motion. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a physical therapist's manual assessment of lumbar intervertebral motion compared to ultrasound imaging and the effect of lumbar manipulation on intervertebral motion, pain, and disability,

Methods:

Subjects will complete a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPR),Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and a Central Sensitization Inventory before arriving for the study via Qualtrics survey tool. They will be screened for contraindications to manipulation and neurological signs and symptoms. Active forward bending will be quantified by measuring the distance of the subject's fingertips to the floor. Two experienced physical therapists will evaluate the subject's lumbar intervertebral mobility. They will identify the lumbar segment with the least motion or hypomobility. The subjects will be imaged from L1 to S1 with a 5 MHz curvilinear transducer (Edge II MSK ultrasound unit, SonoSite, Inc, Bothell, WA) in the sidlying position with their trunk and hips flexed to end-range. The examiner will save the sagittal image and then place a digital caliper to measure the distance between the spinous processes from the peak of the hyperechoic curvature of the caudal spinous process to the peak of the hyperechoic curvature of the cranial spinous process of each lumbar segment (L5-S1, L4-L5, L3-L2,L2-L1). Subjects will then be randomized to receive a high-velocity low amplitude thrust manipulation or a sham manipulation. The lumbar spine will be reimaged. The ultrasound examiner will be blinded to the manipulation and the caliper measurements. Finally, subjects will be asked for their Global Rating of Change (GROC) and to actively bend forward to remeasure the distance of their fingertips to the floor. One week later, patients will receive an e-mail containing links to repeat the NPR, GROC, and ODI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive lumbar manipulation or a sham lumbar manipulation.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Participant: the participants will not know whether they received the lumbar manipulation or sham lumbar manipulation.

Care Provider: the care providers (those who perform the lumbar manipulation and sham lumbar manipulation) will not be involved in collecting any outcome data.

Investigator: all investigators collecting outcome measures will not know which subjects received the lumbar manipulation or sham lumbar manipulation.

Outcome assessor: the outcome assessors will not be involved in collecting data.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lumbar Mnaipulation

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive lumbar manipulation by an experience physical therapist.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lumbar Manipulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The participant lies on the right side. The right leg is straightened at the knee. The left knee is flexed to the level to be manipulated, and the left foot is placed behind the right lower leg. The caregiver introduces rotation of the participant's upper body down to the level to be manipulated. The caregiver then takes up an axillary hold. The caregiver places his right forearm in the region between the gluteus medius and maximus. The caregiver then rolls the participant towards them. Prior to thrusting, the caregiver applies a slight overpressure and holds the position for 10 seconds. If the participant does not experience any adverse effects, over-pressure is released, and the restrictive barrier re=engaged. The caregiver applies a HVLA thrust against the participant's buttocks by dropping their body. If a cavitation "pop" is not heard the first time, a second attempt is made. The procedure is repeated on the opposite side.

Sham Lumbar Manipulation

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive a sham lumbar manipulation by an experienced physical therapist.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Lumbar Manipulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The participant lies on the right side. The right leg is straightened at the knee. The left knee is flexed SLIGHTLY, and the left foot is placed behind the right lower leg. The caregiver DOES NOT introduce rotation of the participant's upper body down to the level to be manipulated. The caregiver then takes up an axillary hold. The caregiver places his right forearm in the region between the gluteus medius and maximus. The caregiver DOES NOT roll the participant towards them. Prior to thrusting, the caregiver applies a slight overpressure and holds the position for 10 seconds. If the participant does not experience any adverse effects, over-pressure is released, and the restrictive barrier re=engaged. The caregiver applies a HVLA thrust against the participant's buttocks by dropping their body. NO ROTATION OCCURS IN THE SPINE. The procedure is repeated on the opposite side.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lumbar Manipulation

The participant lies on the right side. The right leg is straightened at the knee. The left knee is flexed to the level to be manipulated, and the left foot is placed behind the right lower leg. The caregiver introduces rotation of the participant's upper body down to the level to be manipulated. The caregiver then takes up an axillary hold. The caregiver places his right forearm in the region between the gluteus medius and maximus. The caregiver then rolls the participant towards them. Prior to thrusting, the caregiver applies a slight overpressure and holds the position for 10 seconds. If the participant does not experience any adverse effects, over-pressure is released, and the restrictive barrier re=engaged. The caregiver applies a HVLA thrust against the participant's buttocks by dropping their body. If a cavitation "pop" is not heard the first time, a second attempt is made. The procedure is repeated on the opposite side.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sham Lumbar Manipulation

The participant lies on the right side. The right leg is straightened at the knee. The left knee is flexed SLIGHTLY, and the left foot is placed behind the right lower leg. The caregiver DOES NOT introduce rotation of the participant's upper body down to the level to be manipulated. The caregiver then takes up an axillary hold. The caregiver places his right forearm in the region between the gluteus medius and maximus. The caregiver DOES NOT roll the participant towards them. Prior to thrusting, the caregiver applies a slight overpressure and holds the position for 10 seconds. If the participant does not experience any adverse effects, over-pressure is released, and the restrictive barrier re=engaged. The caregiver applies a HVLA thrust against the participant's buttocks by dropping their body. NO ROTATION OCCURS IN THE SPINE. The procedure is repeated on the opposite side.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years old to 60 years old
* Individuals with mechanical low back pain who have limited spine mobility without signs of nerve root involvement.

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects cannot participate in this study if they:

* ever had any type of spinal surgery
* ever had a spinal infection
* ever had a fracture in your spine
* recently had an episode of acute physical trauma ie a motor vehicle accident or a fall and - were not evaluated by a medical practitioner.
* are apprehensive about their spine being manipulated
* have osteoporosis or have been on corticosteroids for an extended period of time
* have Rheumatoid Arthritis
* have Marfans Syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
* currently have cancer or any other illness
* have a bleeding disorder or are now on blood thinning medications
* have symptoms of tingling, numbness, or weakness below the knee
* are unable to remain in a sidelying position for at least 30 minutes
* are currently pregnant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ithaca College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ithaca College

Ithaca, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

John Winslow, DPT

Role: CONTACT

6072298792

Michael Costello, Dsc

Role: CONTACT

6073399406

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

John Winslow

Role: primary

607-229-8792

Michael Costello

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4016601

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.