A Study of the Effects of Mid-Thoracic Spinal Manipulation and Spinal Mobilization on Heart Rate Variability

NCT ID: NCT02380599

Last Updated: 2015-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spinal mobilization and spinal manipulation are common techniques utilized in the field of physical therapy. Despite their common utility, little is known about the physiological mechanisms underlying the changes experienced following the interventions. Recent research suggests that neurological mechanisms may be involved in the post interventional changes, but research supporting this view is still evolving. Therefore, this study will explore whether there is a neurophysiological difference between spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization techniques. The neurophysiological difference will be measured by monitoring heart rate variability, a cardiovagal indicator of autonomic nervous system activity. The primary hypotheses of this study are three-fold, first that spinal manipulation will result in a change in heart rate variability that is different then sham intervention. Second, spinal mobilization will result in a change in heart rate variability that is different then sham intervention. Finally, the investigators hypothesize that spinal mobilization and spinal manipulation will produce different changes in heart rate variability.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will utilize a crossover design to study autonomic nervous system responses in healthy subjects. Prior to commencing data collection, Institutional Review Board approval has been obtained from the Mount St. Mary's College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects. Once obtained subjects will be recruited from faculty, students, and staff of the College. A snowball methodology will be used to recruit friends, family, and acquaintances of these initial connections. To be included in this study, candidates must be between the age of 18 and 55 years of age. They must not have pain in any area of their body that is chronic in nature (has been present for greater then three months). Subjects who are pregnant or have a history of spinal surgery will be excluded from participation in this study. All subjects who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be informed of the intent, methods and risks associated with the study and given an opportunity to ask questions. Following this information session, and if agreeing to participate in the study, subjects will be asked to fill out the attached informed consent form. All subjects will be notified and given the opportunity to withdrawal from the study at any time without repercussions.

Once accepted into the study, subjects will fill out a personal history questionnaire to gather demographic information such as age, medical history, gender, and current pain levels. The subject will also be asked to fill out the General Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale Questionnaire. Once collected, subjects will be assigned a confidential subject number and all personal identifiers will be removed from subject information. All data will be scanned and stored in a personal computer that is password protect. Also at this time, subjects will be randomly assigned to a treatment group. Since this is a crossover design, all subjects will receive all interventions, but the order of these interventions will be predetermined and randomized.

At this point, subjects will be taken to a quiet room located within the Department of Physical Therapy. This room is used as a lab and data collection room and has a physical therapy treatment table. The subject will be asked to lie prone on the table and an electrocardiographic recording sensory will be placed upon each wrist (two total). This sensory will feed data regarding heart rate to a laptop computer that will be collected using the Biocomm HRV Live! Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Data Acquisition program. Once the strength and stability of the signal is verified, the subject will be instructed to rest quietly for five minutes in order to gather baseline heart rate data. Following this five-minute timeframe, the subject will receive one of three interventions based upon the previously mentioned randomization process. The three interventions utilized in the study will be a posterior to anterior spinal manipulation delivered to T4-5 spinal segment, posterior to anterior spinal mobilization applied to the T4-5 spinal segment for 30 seconds, or sham therapeutic ultrasound applied to the T4-5 spinal region bilaterally for 30 seconds (the ultrasound machines will not be turned on). Between each of these interventions, subjects will be instructed to rest quietly for five minutes in order to stabilize the body's cardiovagal responses. Following completion of these three interventions, subjects will allowed to ask additional questions and will be given the number of the principal investigator and the IRB office to contact if they have questions or concerns in the future.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physiology of Manipulation / Mobilization in Healthy Adults

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental Group

Crossover assignment of mid-thoracic spinal manipulation, spinal mobilization, or sham ultrasound

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal Manipulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Mid-thoracic spinal manipulation to T3-5 region

Spinal Mobilization

Intervention Type OTHER

Mid-thoracic spinal mobilization to T3-5 region

Sham Ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

Sham ultrasound to T3-5 region

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal Manipulation

Mid-thoracic spinal manipulation to T3-5 region

Intervention Type OTHER

Spinal Mobilization

Mid-thoracic spinal mobilization to T3-5 region

Intervention Type OTHER

Sham Ultrasound

Sham ultrasound to T3-5 region

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy adults

Exclusion Criteria

* History of back surgeries, osteopenia, osteoporosis, spinal fractures, rib fractures, chronic pain over three months, or heart conditions. Subjects will also be excluded if they are currently taking or have a significant history of taking steroid or anticoagulant medications.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mount St. Mary's College, Los Angeles, CA

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Derrick Sueki

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Derrick Sueki, DPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mount St. Mary's College, Los Angeles, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mount St. Mary's College

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MountSMCLA 3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.