Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface for Control of Lower Limb Prostheses

NCT ID: NCT06275282

Last Updated: 2025-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-13

Study Completion Date

2027-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Individuals with an above-knee lower limb amputation are known to walk more slowly, expend more energy, have a greater risk of falling, and have reduced quality of life compared to individuals without amputation and those with below knee amputation. One of the driving factors behind these deficits is the lack of active function provided by above-knee prostheses with prosthetic knees and ankles. While many prosthetic devices have been developed for functional restoration after major lower extremity amputation, there remains no stable interface to facilitate reliable, long-term volitional control of an advanced robotic limb capable moving multiple joints. Moreover, there is no existing interface that provides useful sensory feedback that in turn enhances the functional capabilities of the prosthesis. To achieve both greater signal specificity and long-term signal stability, we have developed a biologic interface known as the Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI). An RPNI consists of a peripheral nerve that is implanted into a free muscle graft that would otherwise go unused in the residual limb. As the nerve grows, it reinnervates the free muscle graft which undergoes a predictable sequence of revascularization and regeneration.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Can the amplitude, movement specificity and stability of sciatic nerve RPNI electromyography (EMG) signals be detected up to one year post RPNI surgery?
2. Do RPNIs contain information to enable control of a physical motorized prosthetic leg with multiple degrees of freedom?
3. Does stimulation of sciatic nerve RPNIs provides meaningful sensory feedback?

Consenting participants with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) will:

1. Undergo RPNI surgery and electrode implantation in the residual limb.
2. Attend regular follow-up visits following surgery to assess the health and signal strength of the RPNIs and their ability to use a prescribed prosthesis between 3- and 12-months following implantation.
3. Undergo explantation of electrodes following the conclusion of data collection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: While many prosthetic devices have been developed for functional restoration after major lower extremity amputation, there is no stable interface to provide reliable, long-term volitional control of an advanced robotic limb capable of multiple degrees of freedom. Moreover, there is no existing interface that provides useful sensory feedback that in turn enhances the functional capabilities of the prosthesis. To address these limitations, the investigators propose use of a novel biologic interface known as the Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI). An RPNI consists of a peripheral nerve that is implanted into a free muscle graft. As the nerve grows, it reinnervates the free muscle graft which undergoes a predictable sequence of revascularization and regeneration. The RPNI leverages these biological processes to provide three essential benefits to people with amputation: 1) intuitive motor control, 2) sensory feedback, and 3) reduction of post-amputation pain.

Objective/Hypotheses: The objective of this application is to (1) determine the extent to which the RPNIs enable generation of high-fidelity motor control signals for a powered knee-ankle prosthesis and (2) demonstrate that meaningful sensory feedback can be generated from stimulation of sciatic nerve RPNIs.

Specific Aims: The specific aims are to: (1) Evaluate the amplitude, movement specificity and stability of sciatic nerve RPNI electromyography (EMG) signals up to one year post RPNI surgery, (2) Assess functional movement performance using sciatic nerve RPNI signals for control of a physical motorized prosthetic leg with multiple degrees of freedom, and (3) Determine whether stimulation of sciatic nerve RPNIs provides meaningful sensory feedback.

Study design: This project is the first clinical investigation of RPNIs in people with lower-limb amputation. The study will recruit 3 individuals with transfemoral amputation. RPNIs will be surgically constructed on the sciatic nerve and intramuscular electrodes will be implanted into these RPNIs and residual muscles. Experiments will then be conducted at regular intervals up to one year post RPNI surgery. These experiments will measure the EMG signals generated by RPNIs in response to volitional movement of the phantom limb. These signals will then be used to control a two-joint powered prosthesis during cyclic and unpredictable movements. Functional movement, pain, and other patient-reported outcomes will be collected for data analysis. Additionally, RPNIs will be electrically stimulated to elicit sensation. Stimulation will also be provided during the performance of functional tasks.

At the completion of data collection, participants will undergo electrode explantation and complete a postoperative visit to assess recovery, pain and any associated adverse events.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amputation Prostheses and Implants

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI)

Participants will have regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) created on nerves in their residual thighs. During either the same surgery or a separate surgery, electrodes will be implanted into these RPNIs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intramuscular electrodes

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants will have regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) created on nerves in their residual thighs. During either the same surgery or a separate surgery, small electrodes will be implanted into these RPNIs.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intramuscular electrodes

Participants will have regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) created on nerves in their residual thighs. During either the same surgery or a separate surgery, small electrodes will be implanted into these RPNIs.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Unilateral amputation of the leg proximal to the knee at least 6 months prior to enrollment.
* Low surgical risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I and II).
* For participants without existing RPNI grafts (at the time of enrollment), the residual limb must have sufficient soft tissue quality to support performance of the RPNI operative procedures. Participants sustaining severe crushing or avulsion injuries with substantial superficial and deep scarring may not be appropriate candidates for inclusion in the study.
* Amputee Mobility Predictor with prosthesis (AMPPRO) score of at least 37 (Gailey et al. 2002).
* Sufficient clearance to a motorized prosthetic leg without the necessity for shoe lifts or extenders on the contralateral limb.

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe pain syndrome including complex regional pain syndrome or severe phantom pain. All of these conditions would suggest pathological activity of the nerve and would exclude the participant from participation.
* Untreated mental health disorders and if they have any DSM-5 diagnoses, they must receive approval to participate from their mental health professional.
* Any medical conditions that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, would place them at high risk for a surgical procedure including recent myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, uncontrolled diabetes, or end stage renal disease.
* Participants must not have used tobacco for at least one month prior to enrollment in the study.
* Participants must agree to not use tobacco for the duration of the study.
* Pregnancy.
* No other indwelling electronic implants like pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, implantable neurostimulators, body worn insulin pumps, or body worn patient monitoring devices.
* Severe peripheral vascular occlusive disease, venous hypertension of the extremity, or severe lymphedema of the extremity.
* An autoimmune condition which is not well controlled by medication.
* A significant injury of the contralateral limb.
* Significant, uncorrected vision problems.
* Impaired mental capacity that negatively impacts verbal communication with the clinicians and research team or requires a Legally Authorized Representative to facilitate communication.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

United States Department of Defense

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Deanna H Gates

Professor, School of Kinesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Deanna Gates, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Michigan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Deanna Gates, PhD

Role: CONTACT

734-647-2698

Jennifer B Hamill, MPH

Role: CONTACT

570.559.7912

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Deanna Gates, PhD

Role: primary

723-647-2698

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HUM00235849

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Epidural Stimulation for Upper Extremity Function
NCT06437548 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
AB Gait Estim Neurophysiology
NCT06430164 RECRUITING NA