Implanted Myoelectric Control for Restoration of Hand Function in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT ID: NCT00583804
Last Updated: 2025-10-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1989-04-01
2027-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hand Function for Tetraplegia
NCT00890916
Multi-functional Neuroprosthetic System for Restoration of Motor Function in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT02329652
Restoring Arm and Hand Function With Non-invasive Spinal Stimulation
NCT01906424
Development of Optimal Sensory Feedback Strategies to Maximize Function After Tetraplegia
NCT07225582
Evaluating Neuromuscular Stimulation for Restoring Hand Movements
NCT03385005
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects who consent to participate in this project will have an implantable stimulator surgically placed in the upper extremity for control of the upper extremity. A series of tests will be performed before implantation, and repeated at intervals after implantation to assess changes in each subject's performance.
This study is a non-randomized feasibility study with concurrent (neuroprosthesis on and off) and longitudinal (pre- and post-implantation/training) self-controls.
Subjects participating in the study can expect to be actively involved in the study for two years after implantation and followed for life thereafter. The screening procedures take up to two days, depending on the specific evaluations necessary to determine candidacy. Pre-surgical exercise is conducted for at least two weeks. The implantation surgery itself lasts one day, with three to seven days of post-surgical hospitalization. Following an eight-week exercise program and a twelve-week training program, subjects are discharged from the active rehabilitation phase. They are followed quarterly for one year, and then annually thereafter.
The device is referred to as the Implanted Stimulator-Telemeter (IST) -12. The device uses functional electrical stimulation (FES) to activate paralyzed muscles.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stimulation ON
Individuals implanted with stimulator/sensor device. Stimulator is turned on and is active.
IST-12
Implanted stimulator and sensor device, with twelve implanted stimulating electrodes and two myoelectric signal recording electrodes.
Stimulation OFF
Function with stimulation turned off.
IST-12
Implanted stimulator and sensor device, with twelve implanted stimulating electrodes and two myoelectric signal recording electrodes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IST-12
Implanted stimulator and sensor device, with twelve implanted stimulating electrodes and two myoelectric signal recording electrodes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Minimum of one-year post injury with no additional function prior to implantation surgery
* Male or female
* 18-60 years of age
* intact vision
* pharmacologically controlled spasticity, when applicable
* Functional in wheelchair with adequate trunk support to allow bimanual manipulation
* Positive attitude and motivation with supportive home environment
* Willingness to return to laboratory for periodic evaluation and testing
* Free of contractures known to diminish performance of the system (e.g., supination contracture of the wrist).
* Integrity of the lower motor neuron (peripheral nerve) to the muscles to be activated
* Adequate range of motion of joints of the shoulder, wrist, and hand (upper extremity).
* If an acute infection is present, the subject will not be considered for surgery until it clears.
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindications include immunologic diseases, cardiac arrhythmias, undiagnosed or high-risk breast masses, dermatologic conditions, and any major system failure.
* Acute infection currently present that has not cleared.
* Hypersensitivity that inhibits their ability to sustain pressure over their digits.
* Blind
* Uncontrolled disorders, i.e., seizures
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Case Western Reserve University
OTHER
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
FDA Office of Orphan Products Development
FED
MetroHealth Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kevin Kilgore
Program Manager
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin L Kilgore, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MetroHealth Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Peckham PH, Kilgore KL, Keith MW, Bryden AM, Bhadra N, Montague FW. An advanced neuroprosthesis for restoration of hand and upper arm control using an implantable controller. J Hand Surg Am. 2002 Mar;27(2):265-76. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.30919.
Kilgore KL, Bryden A, Keith MW, Hoyen HA, Hart RL, Nemunaitis GA, Peckham PH. Evolution of Neuroprosthetic Approaches to Restoration of Upper Extremity Function in Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Summer;24(3):252-264. doi: 10.1310/sci2403-252.
Peckham PH, Keith MW, Kilgore KL, Grill JH, Wuolle KS, Thrope GB, Gorman P, Hobby J, Mulcahey MJ, Carroll S, Hentz VR, Wiegner A; Implantable Neuroprosthesis Research Group. Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: a multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Oct;82(10):1380-8. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25910.
Kilgore KL, Hoyen HA, Bryden AM, Hart RL, Keith MW, Peckham PH. An implanted upper-extremity neuroprosthesis using myoelectric control. J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Apr;33(4):539-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.007.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Cleveland FES Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VA Merit Review A3707R
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB89-00027
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.