Enhancing Corticospinal Excitability to Improve Functional Recovery

NCT ID: NCT03237091

Last Updated: 2019-10-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-03

Study Completion Date

2019-09-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Research indicates that increasing brain excitability might help improve hand function in people with spinal cord injury. Brain stimulation that uses electrodes placed on the surface of the scalp (also called "non-invasive brain stimulation") increases brain excitability and has the potential to make it easier for the brain and nervous system to respond to arm and hand training. The purpose of this study is to compare four different types of stimulation for increasing brain excitability to determine which types are best for helping people with tetraplegia improve their ability to use their arms and hands. To fully evaluate the value of brain stimulation on arm and hand function, the investigators will also evaluate the effect of sham (fake) stimulation. Each participant will receive a single session of each of the five types of stimulation being tested.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Restoration of upper extremity function is often the top rehabilitation goal for persons who have sustained a cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Following SCI, beyond the disruption caused by the injury itself, maladaptive cortical reorganization further limits descending corticospinal drive. Therefore, therapies aimed at increasing the descending drive provided by corticospinal and other descending supraspinal tracts could be beneficial adjuncts to commonly used rehabilitation therapies. While many rehabilitation research strategies for improving function following SCI target the spinal circuitry, relatively few rehabilitative approaches are directed toward promoting supraspinal neuroplasticity to reduce impairment by increasing volitional control. Spectacular high-tech interventions and elegant high-tech outcome measures generate a great deal of excitement in the scientific world. However, the technological investment and training required for these approaches and the questionable clinical meaningfulness of the outcomes is a major limitation to their real-world value.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a clinically accessible form of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) that has been shown to improve upper extremity function in persons with SCI. Clinical accessibility and the potential for prolonged modulation of cortical excitability make tDCS is an attractive tool for non-invasive modulation of corticospinal excitability.

Beyond traditional tDCS, intriguing recent studies in non-disabled individuals suggest a novel form of NIBS, transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS), may be more effective for inducing changes in corticospinal excitability. tPCS utilizes unidirectional, positive pulses of current separated by brief interpulse intervals rather than continuous direct current. Some evidence from our lab and others indicates that patterned stimulation has a larger influence on neural excitability than uniform stimulation.

Importantly, the efficacy of NIBS is dependent upon stimulation site. Since persons with tetraplegia have bimanual impairments, it has been suggested that bihemispheric anodal (excitatory) tDCS may be of value. Bihemispheric anodal tDCS has been studied in non-disabled individuals; this approach was found to be safe and was associated with improved bimanual control. However, the value of this approach has not previously been assessed in persons with tetraplegia.

The investigators propose a randomized, sham-controlled crossover study in which two forms of NIBS (tDCS and tPCS) will be compared with a sham-control intervention to determine their relative efficacy for improving upper extremity strength and motor control (Aim 1) and corticospinal excitability (Aim 2) in individuals with chronic (≥ 6 months) tetraplegia. The efficacy of two different stimulation montages, uni- and bihemispheric, will also be compared (Aim 3). Subjects will receive a single session of each NIBS condition (unihemispheric tDCS, bihemispheric tDCS, unihemispheric tPCS, bihemispheric tPCS) and a sham-control condition.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries Tetraplegia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This is a a randomized, sham-controlled crossover study in which all participants will participate in a single session of each type of intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

bihemispheric transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bihemispheric transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS)

Intervention Type OTHER

Two sets of sponge electrodes (one set placed on each side of the head) will be placed on the participant's head. The transcranial electrical stimulator will apply unidirectional, positive pulses of current separated by brief interpulse intervals to the scalp via the sponges for 30 minutes.

unihemispheric transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

unihemispheric transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS)

Intervention Type OTHER

One set of sponge electrodes will be placed on the participant's head. The transcranial electrical stimulator will apply unidirectional, positive pulses of current separated by brief interpulse intervals to the scalp via the sponges for 30 minutes.

bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Intervention Type OTHER

Two sets of sponge electrodes (one set placed on each side of the head) will be placed on the participant's head. The transcranial electrical stimulator will apply continuous, direct current to the scalp via the sponges for 30 minutes.

unihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

unihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Intervention Type OTHER

One set of sponge electrodes will be placed on the participant's head. The transcranial electrical stimulator will apply continuous, direct current to the scalp via the sponges for 30 minutes.

sham-control

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

sham-control

Intervention Type OTHER

Sponge electrodes will be placed on the participant's head. The transcranial electrical stimulator will apply stimulation to the scalp via the sponges for 1-2 minutes. The stimulator will then be turned off.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bihemispheric transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS)

Two sets of sponge electrodes (one set placed on each side of the head) will be placed on the participant's head. The transcranial electrical stimulator will apply unidirectional, positive pulses of current separated by brief interpulse intervals to the scalp via the sponges for 30 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

unihemispheric transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS)

One set of sponge electrodes will be placed on the participant's head. The transcranial electrical stimulator will apply unidirectional, positive pulses of current separated by brief interpulse intervals to the scalp via the sponges for 30 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Two sets of sponge electrodes (one set placed on each side of the head) will be placed on the participant's head. The transcranial electrical stimulator will apply continuous, direct current to the scalp via the sponges for 30 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

unihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

One set of sponge electrodes will be placed on the participant's head. The transcranial electrical stimulator will apply continuous, direct current to the scalp via the sponges for 30 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

sham-control

Sponge electrodes will be placed on the participant's head. The transcranial electrical stimulator will apply stimulation to the scalp via the sponges for 1-2 minutes. The stimulator will then be turned off.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cervical (neurological level C1-C8) SCI occurring more than 6 months ago
* Any severity classification (ASIA/ISNCSCI A, B, C, D)
* Self-reported functional limitation in at least one upper limb
* Ability to voluntarily move thumb or index finger (visible twitch) of both upper limbs
* Ability and willingness to consent to participate in the study and authorize use of protected health information

Exclusion Criteria

* Pacemaker or metal implant in the head
* History of seizure
* History of frequent or severe headaches
* Damage to the nerves of the arms/hands (lower motor neuron damage) as documented in medical record, per participant report, or during in-person screening
* Prior tendon or nerve transfer surgery
* Severe pain or hypersensitivity of the arm/hand that would limit participation in arm and hand training
* Severe contractures of the arm/hand that would limit participation in arm and hand training
* Current pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shepherd Center

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

723

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hand Function for Tetraplegia
NCT00890916 COMPLETED NA
Epidural Stimulation for Upper Extremity Function
NCT06437548 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Spinal Cord Stimulation and Training
NCT05472584 RECRUITING NA