Comparison of Free Gingival Graft and Modified Apical Repositioning Flap Techniques
NCT ID: NCT06253910
Last Updated: 2024-02-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-15
2023-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Modified Free Gingival Graft and Conventional Free Gingival Graft on Gingival Recession
NCT06737120
The Efficacy of De-epithelialized Free Gingival Graft on Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions With Tunnel Technique
NCT04291963
Comparison of De-Epithelialized Gingival Graft With or Without Platelet Rich Fibrin in Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT06509867
The Evaluation Clinical Results of Coronally Advanced Flap With Platelet Rich Fibrin
NCT04942821
Effect of Leucocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Palatal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Harvesting
NCT06777069
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patient selection
A total of 15 (female) patients, between 31 and 70 years, who were systemically and periodontally healthy and applied to the periodontology clinic for treatment, were included in our study. Criteria for inclusion in the study are having ≥15 permanent teeth excluding third molars, not using any orthodontic appliance, not being pregnant or breastfeeding, not having any uncontrolled chronic and/or auto-immune disease, and not smoking.
Patients selection
Patient selection were selected according to selected criteria.
MARF and FGG tehcniques
Free gingival graft for the treatment of a total of 21 teeth with gingival recession in the lower jaw incisors area, no bone dehiscence, and the amount of attached gingiva being at least 0.5 mm and at most 1.5 mm and modified apically positioned flap methods were randomly selected (coin toss) and applied by a single investigator (MY). Surgical methods were performed on a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 2 teeth in the treated areas.
Patients selection
Patient selection were selected according to selected criteria.
Post-surgical evalution and periodontal measurements
Clinical periodontal parameters (plaque index (PI), pocket probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival recession (GR) and clinical attachment level (CAL)) were recorded and evaluated at baseline, third months, first and second years. Periodontal measurements (keratinized tissue width (KTW), attached gingiva width (AGW)) recorded and evaluated at baseline, third months, first and second years.
Recall visits
Following the operations, periodontal measurements were measured at the baseline, third month, first and second years.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patients selection
Patient selection were selected according to selected criteria.
Recall visits
Following the operations, periodontal measurements were measured at the baseline, third month, first and second years.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* not using any orthodontic appliance,
* not being pregnant or breastfeeding,
* not having any uncontrolled chronic and/or auto-immune disease,
* not smoking.
Exclusion Criteria
* smoking.
34 Years
58 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nur Balci, DDs, PhD
Associate Prof Dr
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istanbul Medipol University, School of Dentistry
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Carnio J, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, Pirih FQ. The Modified Apically Repositioned Flap Technique: A Long-Term (4 to 16 Years) Retrospective Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 July/August;38(4):519-524. doi: 10.11607/prd.3028. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
Carnio J, Carnio AT, Pirih FQ, Cordero MG, Camargo PM. The Modified Apically Repositioned Flap Technique and Its Potential to Create Attached Gingiva in Areas with No Keratinized Tissue: A Long-Term (1 to 11 Years) Retrospective Case Series Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 Jan/Feb;40(1):103-109. doi: 10.11607/prd.4241.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
for discussion
for discussion
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
79
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.