Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
122 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-02-12
2022-02-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Our study was conducted on 122 patients who applied to Adıyaman University Faculty of Dentistry and were referred to the Department of Periodontology for routine periodontal controls. Participants' gender, age, height, weight, BMI, education level, tooth brushing and flossing habits as well as clinical parameters PI, GI, SCD, CAS and SDI were noted. Participants were divided into 4 groups as healthy, gingivitis, initial periodontitis and advanced periodontitis and grouped according to the current periodontal classification of 2017. DOS was collected from the groups for examination and 'asprosin, adropin and irisin' values in the samples were evaluated by ELISA test.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigation of Asprosin a Novel Adipokine in Periodontitis
NCT05449821
EVALUATION of GINGIVAL CREVICULAR FLUID and SERUM ASPROSIN LEVELS in OBESE and NORMAL-WEIGHT INDIVIDUALS with PERIODONTITIS
NCT06879951
Asprosin Level in Individuals with Periodontal Disease
NCT06627972
Association of Asprosin in Periodontitis and Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT05647902
Changes in Salivary Asprosin, IL-39, IL-40 and IL-1β Levels in Diabetic Patients with Periodontitis
NCT06735313
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD), which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket; clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars. To assess the intra-examiner calibration, Cronbach's alpha was used and its value was 0.90 for PD and CAL measures. Alveolar bone loss (ABL) was determined in each participant by orthopantomography. The distance between the cemento-enamel junction and the bone crest was measured in both mesial and distal regions and its ratio to the root length was calculated to assess bone loss. The periodontal status of the patients was evaluated based on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions from the 2017 World Workshop. Participants were classified into four distinct groups based on their periodontal conditions:
1. Group 1: 30 periodontally healthy individuals;
2. Group 2: 30 patients with gingivitis;
3. Group 3: 32 patients with generalized stage I and stage II periodontitis;
4. Group 4: 30 patients with generalized stage III and stage IV periodontitis. An individual to be considered to have periodontal health according to this definition, the percentage of sites with bleeding on probing should be no more than 10%, and the probing depth should be 3 mm or less. Patients with gingivitis had PD ≤3 mm, BOP in ≥30% of the probing sites, and no interproximal AL or radiographic bone loss. Stage I periodontitis was diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) ranging between 1 and 2 mm at the site of greatest loss. Radiographic bone loss (BL) is limited to less than 15% and no tooth loss. Additionally, the maximum probing depth (PD) is equal to or less than 4 mm, which primarily involves horizontal bone loss. Stage II periodontitis was diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) ranging between 3 and 4 mm at the site of greatest loss. Radiographic bone loss (BL) extends to a range of 15% to 33%; there is no tooth loss. The maximum probing depth (PD) is equal to or less than 5 mm, or primarily involves horizontal bone loss. Stage III periodontitis is diagnosed when interdental attachment loss (AL) is ≥ 5, radiographic bone loss (BL) extends to the mid-third of the root and beyond, and tooth loss may become evident ≤4 teeth. Either PD ≥ 6 mm or vertical BL ≥ 3 mm, or Class II/III furcation involvement, or moderate ridge defect. Stage IV periodontitis is diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) of ≥ 5 mm at the site of greatest loss, with radiographic BL extending to the mid-third of the root and beyond. ≥5 tooth losses due to periodontitis are evident. In addition to Stage III, either masticatory dysfunction, secondary occlusal trauma (tooth mobility degree ≥ 2), severe ridge defect, bite collapse, or teeth drifting and flaring
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GROUP 1 (periodontally healthy )
An individual to be considered to have periodontal health according to this definition, the percentage of sites with bleeding on probing should be no more than 10%, and the probing depth should be 3 mm or less
Clinical periodontal measuremenets
The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD) which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket, clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars G
ELISA test from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)
GCF sampled from the buccal aspects of non-contiguous proximal regions in maxillary single-rooted teeth. In the periodontitis groups, fluid samples were taken from the two deepest pockets. In the gingivitis and periodontal healthy groups, fluid samples were obtained from areas with and without visible inflammation, respectively
GROUP 2 (gingivitis)
Patients with gingivitis had PD ≤3 mm, BOP in ≥30% of the probing sites, and no interproximal AL or radiographic bone loss
Clinical periodontal measuremenets
The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD) which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket, clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars G
ELISA test from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)
GCF sampled from the buccal aspects of non-contiguous proximal regions in maxillary single-rooted teeth. In the periodontitis groups, fluid samples were taken from the two deepest pockets. In the gingivitis and periodontal healthy groups, fluid samples were obtained from areas with and without visible inflammation, respectively
GROUP 3(generalized stage I and stage II periodontitis)
Stage I periodontitis was diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) ranging between 1 and 2 mm at the site of greatest loss. Radiographic bone loss (BL) is limited to less than 15% and no tooth loss. Additionally, the maximum probing depth (PD) is equal to or less than 4 mm or primarily involves horizontal bone loss. Stage II periodontitis was diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) is ranging between 3 and 4 mm at the site of greatest loss. Radiographic bone loss (BL) extends to a range of 15% to 33%, there is no tooth loss. The maximum probing depth (PD) is equal to or less than 5 mm or primarily involves horizontal bone loss.
Clinical periodontal measuremenets
The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD) which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket, clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars G
ELISA test from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)
GCF sampled from the buccal aspects of non-contiguous proximal regions in maxillary single-rooted teeth. In the periodontitis groups, fluid samples were taken from the two deepest pockets. In the gingivitis and periodontal healthy groups, fluid samples were obtained from areas with and without visible inflammation, respectively
GROUP 4 (generalized stage III and stage IV periodontitis)
Stage III periodontitis is diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) is ≥ 5, radiographic bone loss (BL) extends to mid-third of the root and beyond, tooth loss may become evident ≤4 teeth. Either PD ≥ 6 mm or vertical BL ≥ 3 mm, or Class II/III furcation involvement, or moderate ridge defect. Stage IV periodontitis is diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) is ≥ 5 mm at the site of greatest loss, radiographic BL extending to mid-third of the root and beyond. ≥5 tooth loss due to periodontitis is evident. In addition to Stage III, either masticatory dysfunction, or secondary occlusal trauma (tooth mobility degree ≥ 2), or severe ridge defect, or bite collapse, or teeth drifting and flaring
Clinical periodontal measuremenets
The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD) which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket, clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars G
ELISA test from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)
GCF sampled from the buccal aspects of non-contiguous proximal regions in maxillary single-rooted teeth. In the periodontitis groups, fluid samples were taken from the two deepest pockets. In the gingivitis and periodontal healthy groups, fluid samples were obtained from areas with and without visible inflammation, respectively
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinical periodontal measuremenets
The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD) which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket, clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars G
ELISA test from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)
GCF sampled from the buccal aspects of non-contiguous proximal regions in maxillary single-rooted teeth. In the periodontitis groups, fluid samples were taken from the two deepest pockets. In the gingivitis and periodontal healthy groups, fluid samples were obtained from areas with and without visible inflammation, respectively
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
25 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AYSAN LEKTEMUR ALPAN
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
AYSAN LEKTEMUR ALPAN
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
METİN ÇALIŞIR, PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Adiyaman University
Sevde DEMİRCİ
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Adiyaman University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Adıyaman University Faculty of Dentistry
Adıyaman, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Loesche WJ, Grossman NS. Periodontal disease as a specific, albeit chronic, infection: diagnosis and treatment. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Oct;14(4):727-52, table of contents. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.4.727-752.2001.
Torumtay Cin G, Fenkci SM, Kilic ID, Aslan HS, Sevgican CI, Senol H. The effects of severe periodontitis on arterial stiffness using cardio-ankle vascular index in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Periodontal Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):74-83. doi: 10.1111/jre.13202. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020/9-10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.