Asprosin, Adropin, Irisin Levels in Periodontitis

NCT ID: NCT06250764

Last Updated: 2024-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

122 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-12

Study Completion Date

2022-02-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The recently discovered association of the hormones 'asprosin, adropin and irisin' with obesity and metabolic status, as well as the fact that periodontal diseases are affected by obesity and nutrition bilaterally, have led us to investigate the relationship between selected target markers and periodontal disease. The primary aim and main objective of this study is to increase the knowledge and to direct future researches as a result of the lack of adequate research in the past and the very limited investigations with these hormones in dentistry and periodontology.

Our study was conducted on 122 patients who applied to Adıyaman University Faculty of Dentistry and were referred to the Department of Periodontology for routine periodontal controls. Participants' gender, age, height, weight, BMI, education level, tooth brushing and flossing habits as well as clinical parameters PI, GI, SCD, CAS and SDI were noted. Participants were divided into 4 groups as healthy, gingivitis, initial periodontitis and advanced periodontitis and grouped according to the current periodontal classification of 2017. DOS was collected from the groups for examination and 'asprosin, adropin and irisin' values in the samples were evaluated by ELISA test.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A total of 122 patients participated in the study. All patients participating in the trial received written and verbal information about the purpose and method of the study and signed consent. Patients with cardiovascular disease, liver and kidney disease, metabolic disorders, diabetes, asthma, thyroid dysfunction, who used antibiotics or anti-inflammatory drugs within the last three months, who received periodontal treatment within the last six months, obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 according to the reference range determined by the World Health Organization, and patients who refused to participate were excluded from the study. In order to calculate the BMI of the individuals included in the study, height-weight information, tooth brushing frequency in order to determine oral hygiene habits, and educational status were also recorded to determine economic levels. Age and gender were also noted. Individuals aged 25-60 years were divided into four groups according to their periodontal status.

The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD), which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket; clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars. To assess the intra-examiner calibration, Cronbach's alpha was used and its value was 0.90 for PD and CAL measures. Alveolar bone loss (ABL) was determined in each participant by orthopantomography. The distance between the cemento-enamel junction and the bone crest was measured in both mesial and distal regions and its ratio to the root length was calculated to assess bone loss. The periodontal status of the patients was evaluated based on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions from the 2017 World Workshop. Participants were classified into four distinct groups based on their periodontal conditions:

1. Group 1: 30 periodontally healthy individuals;
2. Group 2: 30 patients with gingivitis;
3. Group 3: 32 patients with generalized stage I and stage II periodontitis;
4. Group 4: 30 patients with generalized stage III and stage IV periodontitis. An individual to be considered to have periodontal health according to this definition, the percentage of sites with bleeding on probing should be no more than 10%, and the probing depth should be 3 mm or less. Patients with gingivitis had PD ≤3 mm, BOP in ≥30% of the probing sites, and no interproximal AL or radiographic bone loss. Stage I periodontitis was diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) ranging between 1 and 2 mm at the site of greatest loss. Radiographic bone loss (BL) is limited to less than 15% and no tooth loss. Additionally, the maximum probing depth (PD) is equal to or less than 4 mm, which primarily involves horizontal bone loss. Stage II periodontitis was diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) ranging between 3 and 4 mm at the site of greatest loss. Radiographic bone loss (BL) extends to a range of 15% to 33%; there is no tooth loss. The maximum probing depth (PD) is equal to or less than 5 mm, or primarily involves horizontal bone loss. Stage III periodontitis is diagnosed when interdental attachment loss (AL) is ≥ 5, radiographic bone loss (BL) extends to the mid-third of the root and beyond, and tooth loss may become evident ≤4 teeth. Either PD ≥ 6 mm or vertical BL ≥ 3 mm, or Class II/III furcation involvement, or moderate ridge defect. Stage IV periodontitis is diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) of ≥ 5 mm at the site of greatest loss, with radiographic BL extending to the mid-third of the root and beyond. ≥5 tooth losses due to periodontitis are evident. In addition to Stage III, either masticatory dysfunction, secondary occlusal trauma (tooth mobility degree ≥ 2), severe ridge defect, bite collapse, or teeth drifting and flaring

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periodontal Diseases Gingivitis Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GROUP 1 (periodontally healthy )

An individual to be considered to have periodontal health according to this definition, the percentage of sites with bleeding on probing should be no more than 10%, and the probing depth should be 3 mm or less

Clinical periodontal measuremenets

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD) which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket, clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars G

ELISA test from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

GCF sampled from the buccal aspects of non-contiguous proximal regions in maxillary single-rooted teeth. In the periodontitis groups, fluid samples were taken from the two deepest pockets. In the gingivitis and periodontal healthy groups, fluid samples were obtained from areas with and without visible inflammation, respectively

GROUP 2 (gingivitis)

Patients with gingivitis had PD ≤3 mm, BOP in ≥30% of the probing sites, and no interproximal AL or radiographic bone loss

Clinical periodontal measuremenets

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD) which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket, clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars G

ELISA test from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

GCF sampled from the buccal aspects of non-contiguous proximal regions in maxillary single-rooted teeth. In the periodontitis groups, fluid samples were taken from the two deepest pockets. In the gingivitis and periodontal healthy groups, fluid samples were obtained from areas with and without visible inflammation, respectively

GROUP 3(generalized stage I and stage II periodontitis)

Stage I periodontitis was diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) ranging between 1 and 2 mm at the site of greatest loss. Radiographic bone loss (BL) is limited to less than 15% and no tooth loss. Additionally, the maximum probing depth (PD) is equal to or less than 4 mm or primarily involves horizontal bone loss. Stage II periodontitis was diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) is ranging between 3 and 4 mm at the site of greatest loss. Radiographic bone loss (BL) extends to a range of 15% to 33%, there is no tooth loss. The maximum probing depth (PD) is equal to or less than 5 mm or primarily involves horizontal bone loss.

Clinical periodontal measuremenets

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD) which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket, clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars G

ELISA test from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

GCF sampled from the buccal aspects of non-contiguous proximal regions in maxillary single-rooted teeth. In the periodontitis groups, fluid samples were taken from the two deepest pockets. In the gingivitis and periodontal healthy groups, fluid samples were obtained from areas with and without visible inflammation, respectively

GROUP 4 (generalized stage III and stage IV periodontitis)

Stage III periodontitis is diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) is ≥ 5, radiographic bone loss (BL) extends to mid-third of the root and beyond, tooth loss may become evident ≤4 teeth. Either PD ≥ 6 mm or vertical BL ≥ 3 mm, or Class II/III furcation involvement, or moderate ridge defect. Stage IV periodontitis is diagnosed with interdental attachment loss (AL) is ≥ 5 mm at the site of greatest loss, radiographic BL extending to mid-third of the root and beyond. ≥5 tooth loss due to periodontitis is evident. In addition to Stage III, either masticatory dysfunction, or secondary occlusal trauma (tooth mobility degree ≥ 2), or severe ridge defect, or bite collapse, or teeth drifting and flaring

Clinical periodontal measuremenets

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD) which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket, clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars G

ELISA test from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

GCF sampled from the buccal aspects of non-contiguous proximal regions in maxillary single-rooted teeth. In the periodontitis groups, fluid samples were taken from the two deepest pockets. In the gingivitis and periodontal healthy groups, fluid samples were obtained from areas with and without visible inflammation, respectively

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clinical periodontal measuremenets

The periodontal assessment was performed by a single trained examiner (S.D.). A graded periodontal probe (Williams, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure probing depth (PD) which was determined as the depth from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus/periodontal pocket, clinical attachment loss (CAL) which was calculated as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and dual recording (+/-) of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) in total except third molars G

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

ELISA test from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)

GCF sampled from the buccal aspects of non-contiguous proximal regions in maxillary single-rooted teeth. In the periodontitis groups, fluid samples were taken from the two deepest pockets. In the gingivitis and periodontal healthy groups, fluid samples were obtained from areas with and without visible inflammation, respectively

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with cardiovascular disease, liver and kidney disease, metabolic disorders, diabetes, asthma, thyroid dysfunction, who used antibiotics or anti-inflammatory drugs within the last three months, who received periodontal treatment within the last six months, obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 according to the reference range determined by the World Health Organisation, and patients who refused to participate were excluded from the study
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AYSAN LEKTEMUR ALPAN

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

AYSAN LEKTEMUR ALPAN

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

METİN ÇALIŞIR, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Adiyaman University

Sevde DEMİRCİ

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Adiyaman University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Adıyaman University Faculty of Dentistry

Adıyaman, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Loesche WJ, Grossman NS. Periodontal disease as a specific, albeit chronic, infection: diagnosis and treatment. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Oct;14(4):727-52, table of contents. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.4.727-752.2001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11585783 (View on PubMed)

Torumtay Cin G, Fenkci SM, Kilic ID, Aslan HS, Sevgican CI, Senol H. The effects of severe periodontitis on arterial stiffness using cardio-ankle vascular index in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Periodontal Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):74-83. doi: 10.1111/jre.13202. Epub 2023 Nov 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37909328 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020/9-10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.