Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
NCT ID: NCT06230003
Last Updated: 2025-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
67 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-21
2025-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ESP Block VS Intrathecal Opioid After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
NCT05257941
Regional Anesthesia in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT05029726
Effects of Continuous ESP Catheters on Recovery, Pain and Opioid Consumption After Multilevel Spine Surgery
NCT05494125
Erector Spinae Block for Spine Surgery
NCT05417113
Erector Spine Block for Back Surgery
NCT03214536
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Performance of ESP block: Patient Selection. A thorough history, physical exam, and informed consent are carried out. Altered mental status, concomitant injuries, and intubation/ ventilation are considerations primarily with regard to the ability to position the patient safely and access the Paraspinal area to perform the block. The investigators do not view coagulopathy or the use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs as absolute contraindications to ESP block because the theoretical risk of clinically significant hemorrhage or hematoma is very low; however, an individualized risk-benefit assessment should be performed for every patient. Block Equipment and Preparation. In the majority of patients, the investigators will use a high-frequency (10-15 MHz) linear-array transducer because it provides a higher-resolution image; however, a low-frequency (5-2 MHz) curvilinear probe is useful in more obese patients where the transverse processes lie at a depth greater than 4 cm. The block is performed before induction of anesthesia with full aseptic precautions, and the usual precautions for any regional anesthesia procedures will be applied. Scanning Technique. After patients are positioned optimally (sitting or lateral decubitus), the affected area is identified along with the target transverse process. The ultrasound transducer is placed in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation, about 3 cm lateral to the spinous processes, allowing for visualization of adjacent transverse processes (TP) in an in-plane approach. These are recognizable as flat, squared-off acoustic shadows with only a very faint image of the pleura visible. After correct TP identification, an 22-gauge echogenic needle (Pajunk E-Cath, Pajunk Medical Systems) is inserted using an in-plane, cranial-to-caudal approach to contact the bony shadow of the TP with the tip deep to the fascial plane of the erector spinae muscle. The correct location of the needle tip is confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml of normal saline 0.9% and observing linear fluid spread lifting the erector spinae muscle off the tip of the TP. Once the fascial plane is recognized, 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% is injected and cranial and caudal spread of local anesthetic can be visualized.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
Ultrasound guided bilateral ESP block either with local anesthetic
Ropivacaine
Ultrasound guided ESP block either with the local anesthetic of 0.5% of Ropivicane 20 mL bilaterally (intervention group) or normal saline (control group) before surgery which will take 5-10 minutes in a 1:1 ratio.
Control group
Ultrasound guided bilateral ESP block either with normal saline
normal saline
Ultrasound guided bilateral ESP block either with normal saline
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ropivacaine
Ultrasound guided ESP block either with the local anesthetic of 0.5% of Ropivicane 20 mL bilaterally (intervention group) or normal saline (control group) before surgery which will take 5-10 minutes in a 1:1 ratio.
normal saline
Ultrasound guided bilateral ESP block either with normal saline
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ASA physical status I-III
3. IBD abdominal laparoscopic assisted surgeries under general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
2. Unstable requiring emergency surgery
3. Open laparotomies
4. Morbidly obese
5. Pregnant
6. On chronic opioid treatment
7. Known allergies to local anesthetics
8. Altered mental status
9. Concomitant injuries.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Naveed Siddiqui
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Naveed Siddiqui, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-0272-A
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.