Intra-abdominal Pressure and Insufflator Effects in Robotic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06132490

Last Updated: 2024-03-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-15

Study Completion Date

2023-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main aim of this study is to compare the perioperative effects of different intra-abdominal pressures and different insufflators in patients undergoing robotic surgery at a 30-45 degree trendelenburg position.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Adult patients scheduled for robotic genitourinary or colorectal surgery are going to be enrolled in this study. Patients will be randomized in three groups. In group I, conventional insufflators will be used with 12 mmHg intra-abdominal pressure; in group II, valveless insufflators will be used with 12 mmHg intra-abdominal pressure and in group III, valveless insufflators will be used with 8 mmHg intra-abdominal pressure. Intraoperative data regarding airway pressures, lung compliance, hemodynamic parameters, arterial blood gas analysis, times of pressure loss and camera cleaning will be gathered. Each patient will receive a standardized anesthesia and analgesia procedure with a intravenous morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA). Postoperative pain will be monitored at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th and 24th postoperative hours and morphine consumption rates will be recorded. Patient length of stay, time to first flatus, urine output, postoperative complications(graded by Clavien Dindo classification), preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and creatinine levels will be filed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Operative Pain Hemodynamic Instability Hypercapnia Complication,Postoperative Intraoperative Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The patient and the pain nurses will be blind to the intervention due to the study design.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Valveless 12

Patients scheduled for genitourinary or colorectal robotic surgery, valveless insufflators will be used with 12 mmHg intra-abdominal pressure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Valveless Insufflator with 12 mmHg intra-abdominal pressure

Intervention Type DEVICE

In this group valveless insufflators, which are relatively new in clinical practice, will be used under low intra-abdominal pressure throughout the surgery.

Valveless 8

Patients scheduled for genitourinary or colorectal robotic surgery, valveless insufflators will be used with 8 mmHg intra-abdominal pressure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Valveless Insufflator with 8 mmHg intra-abdominal pressure

Intervention Type DEVICE

In this group valveless insufflators, which are relatively new in clinical practice, will be used under ultra-low intra-abdominal pressure throughout the surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Valveless Insufflator with 12 mmHg intra-abdominal pressure

In this group valveless insufflators, which are relatively new in clinical practice, will be used under low intra-abdominal pressure throughout the surgery.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Valveless Insufflator with 8 mmHg intra-abdominal pressure

In this group valveless insufflators, which are relatively new in clinical practice, will be used under ultra-low intra-abdominal pressure throughout the surgery.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Elective robotic surgery with intraabdominal insufflation and trendelenburg position (prostatectomy, hemicolectomy etc.)
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Physical Status I-II-III

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients without consent
* Emergency surgery
* Bleeding diathesis
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Prior history of major abdominal/pelvic surgery
* Chronic kidney disease
* Chronic opioid consumption for chronic pain
* Inability to communicate with the patient due to language barriers or mental status
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Koç University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Koç University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Feng TS, Heulitt G, Islam A, Porter JR. Comparison of valve-less and standard insufflation on pneumoperitoneum-related complications in robotic partial nephrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01117-z. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32632561 (View on PubMed)

Horstmann M, Horton K, Kurz M, Padevit C, John H. Prospective comparison between the AirSeal(R) System valve-less Trocar and a standard Versaport Plus V2 Trocar in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2013 May;27(5):579-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0632. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23186377 (View on PubMed)

Paull JO, Parsacandola SA, Graham A, Hota S, Pudalov N, Obias V. The impact of the AirSeal(R) valve-less trocar system in robotic colorectal surgery: a single-surgeon retrospective review. J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01071-w. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32333365 (View on PubMed)

La Falce S, Novara G, Gandaglia G, Umari P, De Naeyer G, D'Hondt F, Beresian J, Carette R, Penicka M, Mo Y, Vandenbroucke G, Mottrie A. Low Pressure Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy With the AirSeal System at OLV Hospital: Results From a Prospective Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Dec;15(6):e1029-e1037. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28669704 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022.094.IRB1.040

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.