ECoLoGiC Speech Therapy for Everyday Communication in Aphasia
NCT ID: NCT06132464
Last Updated: 2024-08-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-03
2024-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study asks:
1. How do people with aphasia improve their language skills following this therapy? Results will be determined by using tests of language and by testing language in conversation and other types of talking tasks, like describing a picture.
2. After completing the family training, do family members use the ideas they learned when talking to the person with aphasia? And, what do family members and people with aphasia think of the family training? The first question will be answered with a checklist to see if the family members followed the ideas they learned. The second question will be answered by talking with the people with aphasia and the family members to find out what they thought.
The people with aphasia will complete language testing before and after therapy, and 6 weeks later (to see if improvements are maintained). Therapy is twice a week for one hour, for 10 weeks with a speech-language pathologist. During therapy, the person will have casual conversations with the speech-language pathologist, who will help the person communicate by giving small amounts of help at a time. The speech-language pathologist will tell the person what they are doing that does and does not help with communication. This process helps the person use more language and learn how to communicate better. The family members will have training with the speech-language pathologists to learn about the therapy and how to continue with the ideas at home. Training will take place over 3 sessions, scheduled in addition to therapy sessions. After therapy ends, the family members will have conversations with the person with aphasia, to show what they have learned. Each family member and person with aphasia will also have a 10-20 minute conversation with a researcher to share their thoughts about the training program.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Speech Entrainment for Aphasia Recovery
NCT04364854
Efficacy of Language Games as Therapy for Post Stroke Aphasia
NCT02458222
Augmenting Language Therapy for Aphasia: Levodopa
NCT01429077
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Aphasia After Stroke
NCT06403475
Auditory Masking Effects on Speech Fluency in Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech
NCT02094014
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Each of the three "Testing Phases" will be two weeks long. Each person with aphasia will come for testing sessions three times during the two weeks. If the person wants to divide the testing over more than three visits during two weeks, they can. Tests will include language exams, patient and family self-rating scales and samples of language (i.e., everyday social conversations; and monologues, such as describing a picture). The 15-minute conversation samples will be with the principal researcher, who is a licensed speech-language pathologist and with a self-selected family member. Language sampling techniques for both monologues and conversation will follow standard procedures.
Each person will receive therapy twice a week for 10 weeks. Sessions will be for 60 minutes with a licensed speech-language pathologist who is a lab member and who has been trained in ECoLoGiC Treatment, and who has at least 1 year of experience working with people with aphasia. For individuals completing the Family Training Protocol, three training sessions will be scheduled with the delivering therapist (usually either just before or just after a regularly scheduled therapy session).
Results of the study will be analyzed for each individual with aphasia to determine the amount of change from before therapy to after therapy, and also from before therapy to the follow-up visit (6 weeks later). Test results and patient and family self-report scales will be analyzed according to the test manuals, related journal articles, or whether change is greater than a 10 percent benchmark.
The conversation and monologue samples will be evaluated for language skills, such as vocabulary and grammar, using established language measures. The results will then be analyzed statistically, to determine changes for each person and for the group (using a linear mixed model). Additional calculations will be completed for each person for each of the language measures to determine the amount of change (i.e., effect size), and to determine if the amount of change is greater than the minimal detectable change.
The Family Training Protocol will be analyzed quantitatively for a) Family member fidelity to the protocol during three conversations held at post-treatment and at the 6-week maintenance phase; and b) qualitatively through semi-structured interviews between the Principal Investigator and the person with aphasia; and the Principal Investigator and the trained Family Member, conducted post-treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Expanding Communication and Language Generated in Conversation Treatment
Participants will complete 20 one-hour therapy sessions over 10 weeks with an experienced, trained, and licensed speech-language pathologist delivering Expanding Communication and Language Generated in Conversation Therapy, following the therapy protocol. Sessions will take place through casual conversational interactions, with incremental problem-solving and communication support by the speech-language pathologist.
Expanding Communication and Language Generated in Conversation Treatment
ECoLoGiC Treatment is a behavioral therapy developed to improve language abilities in everyday conversation for people with aphasia. It is delivered through therapeutic use of spontaneous conversational interactions between a speech-language pathologist and a person with aphasia. ECoLoGiC Treatment is based on theories of conversational interaction in adults without communication disorders, as well as on theories of neuroplasticity, rehabilitation, and learning. The therapy consists of two components: a) Therapeutic Conversation, during which the pair discuss any topic of interest to the person with aphasia, while the speech-language pathologist uses techniques to promote social interaction; and b) Therapeutic Repair, used when communication breakdown occurs. At this time, the speech-language pathologist implements the intervention's 7-step least-to-most hierarchy, supporting the person's independence and learning in communicative problem-solving to communicate the desired idea.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Expanding Communication and Language Generated in Conversation Treatment
ECoLoGiC Treatment is a behavioral therapy developed to improve language abilities in everyday conversation for people with aphasia. It is delivered through therapeutic use of spontaneous conversational interactions between a speech-language pathologist and a person with aphasia. ECoLoGiC Treatment is based on theories of conversational interaction in adults without communication disorders, as well as on theories of neuroplasticity, rehabilitation, and learning. The therapy consists of two components: a) Therapeutic Conversation, during which the pair discuss any topic of interest to the person with aphasia, while the speech-language pathologist uses techniques to promote social interaction; and b) Therapeutic Repair, used when communication breakdown occurs. At this time, the speech-language pathologist implements the intervention's 7-step least-to-most hierarchy, supporting the person's independence and learning in communicative problem-solving to communicate the desired idea.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Self-reported adequate vision (aided), for testing procedures
* Pass a hearing screening (aided), in at least one ear at 40 decibels at 1000 Herz
* Monolingual speaker of English
* One or more left hemisphere stroke at least 6 months prior, leading to aphasia
* Right-handed prior to stroke
* Moderate to severe aphasia, as evaluated by the Western Aphasia Battery - Revised and clinical expertise
* Spoken language production of at least 2-3 word utterances (phrases or sentences), as evaluated by the Western Aphasia Battery - Revised and clinical expertise
* Reading comprehension of at least single words to short phrases, as evaluated by the Western Aphasia Battery - Revised and clinical expertise,
* Auditory comprehension for simple language, as evaluated by the Western Aphasia Battery - Revised and clinical expertise
* Pass a hearing screening (aided), in at least one ear at 40 decibels at 1000 Herz
* Cognitive function within normal limits as evaluated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
* Must speak English
Exclusion Criteria
* Older than 85
* Self-reported vision impairment preventing completion of testing (aided)
* Unable to pass hearing screening in at least one ear at 40 decibels at 1000 Herz (aided)
* Multilingual speaker (language proficiency of greater than 4 out of 7 on reading, writing, speaking, or listening in any language other than English; self-rating bilingualism scale)
* Minimal, mild, or profound aphasia as evaluated by the Western Aphasia Battery - Revised and clinical expertise
* Severe cognitive impairment as evaluated by the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test - Plus and clinical expertise
* No greater than a score of 2.5 on the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale
* No greater than 3.0 on the Dysarthria-in-Interaction Profile
* Use of an alternative augmentative communication device as primary means of communication
* Spoken language production consisting of single word or no verbal communication, as evaluated by the Western Aphasia Battery - Revised and clinical expertise
* Inability to comprehend simple language in conversation, as evaluated by the Western Aphasia Battery - Revised and clinical expertise
* Inability to read single words for comprehension, as evaluated by the Western Aphasia Battery - Revised and clinical expertise
* Neurological injury or condition other than left hemisphere stroke
* Left-handed before stroke
* Learning or language disability
* Uncontrolled mental health condition
* Unable to pass hearing screening in one ear at 40 decibels at 1000 Herz (aided)
* Cognitive status below within normal limits cut-off score as evaluated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
NIH
University of Kansas Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marion Leaman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Kansas Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kansas University Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY149823
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.