Inner Speech and Naming Treatment for Individuals with Aphasia
NCT ID: NCT05980897
Last Updated: 2024-09-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-05
2024-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Genetic and Cognitive Predictors of Aphasia Treatment Response
NCT05179538
Criterion-learning Based Naming Treatment in Aphasia
NCT06364709
Dosage and Predictors of Naming Treatment Response in Aphasia
NCT02005016
Treatment for Word Retrieval Impairments in Aphasia
NCT00764400
Criterion-learning Naming Treatment For Addressing Comprehension Deficits in Aphasia
NCT07179458
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Previous research examined whether self-reported "successful IS" (sIS) (i.e., I can say the word in my head and it sounds right) predicted therapy outcomes in two participants. In both participants, self-reported IS predicted whether or not (and how quickly) individual words were successfully re-learned during a paired-associate treatment for anomia, and the effect was visible within just a few treatment sessions. This trial provides preliminary evidence that IS can be leveraged to improve outcomes of naming therapy for individuals with aphasia. This study aims to extend these prior finding by implementing a behavioral treatment for anomia using a single-subject experimental design in a larger group of individuals with aphasia.
The investigators predict that items reported as sIS will be more effectively learned during anomia treatment than items that are reported as uIS. Because sIS items are already being retrieved by the individual, one can think of them as being closer to successful spoken output than items that are not able to be retrieved (i.e., those reported as uIS).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Naming Treatment
Participants will complete three sessions of baseline probe testing (40 treatment items) occurring virtually on three consecutive days prior to treatment onset. Participants will then complete 10 sessions of therapy scheduled five days a week for two weeks, all occurring virtually. The treatment approach for this study will be a hierarchical, cueing-based treatment for naming.
Naming treatment
In this alternating treatment single-subject experimental design study, the investigators will alternate between two treatment conditions, i.e., two different types of stimulus items: those that are consistently reported as successful IS prior to treatment (sIS items) and those that are consistently reported as unsuccessful IS prior to treatment (uIS items). The treatment will be computerized to ensure consistency of presentation, timing, and cues across participants.
For each stimulus presentation, the treatment hierarchy will proceed as follows:
1. Name the picture independently
2. Name the picture with a written cue
3. Repeat the name of the picture
4. Name the picture after a 5 second delay Each participant will be trained on a set of 40 items chosen specifically for them based on initial/baseline testing.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Naming treatment
In this alternating treatment single-subject experimental design study, the investigators will alternate between two treatment conditions, i.e., two different types of stimulus items: those that are consistently reported as successful IS prior to treatment (sIS items) and those that are consistently reported as unsuccessful IS prior to treatment (uIS items). The treatment will be computerized to ensure consistency of presentation, timing, and cues across participants.
For each stimulus presentation, the treatment hierarchy will proceed as follows:
1. Name the picture independently
2. Name the picture with a written cue
3. Repeat the name of the picture
4. Name the picture after a 5 second delay Each participant will be trained on a set of 40 items chosen specifically for them based on initial/baseline testing.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Are at least 18 years old
* Learned English at age 5 years or younger
* Normal or corrected-to-normal hearing and vision
* Have access to reliable internet at home for remote participation
Exclusion Criteria
* Have a history of psychiatric disease requiring hospitalization, electroconvulsive therapy, or ongoing medication use (other than common antidepressants)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
George Washington University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mackenzie Fama
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mackenzie Fama
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The George Washington University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The George Washington University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fama ME, Hayward W, Snider SF, Friedman RB, Turkeltaub PE. Subjective experience of inner speech in aphasia: Preliminary behavioral relationships and neural correlates. Brain Lang. 2017 Jan;164:32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
Fama ME, Snider SF, Henderson MP, Hayward W, Friedman RB, Turkeltaub PE. The Subjective Experience of Inner Speech in Aphasia Is a Meaningful Reflection of Lexical Retrieval. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Jan 30;62(1):106-122. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0222.
Fama ME, Henderson MP, Snider SF, Hayward W, Friedman RB, Turkeltaub PE. Self-reported inner speech relates to phonological retrieval ability in people with aphasia. Conscious Cogn. 2019 May;71:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
Fama ME, Turkeltaub PE. Inner Speech in Aphasia: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Directions. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 21;29(1S):560-573. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0212. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
Hayward W, Snider SF, Luta G, Friedman RB, Turkeltaub PE. Objective support for subjective reports of successful inner speech in two people with aphasia. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 Jul-Sep;33(5-6):299-314. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1192998. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCR224453
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.