Genetic and Cognitive Predictors of Aphasia Treatment Response

NCT ID: NCT05179538

Last Updated: 2024-05-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-23

Study Completion Date

2025-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aphasia, or language impairment after a stroke, affects approximately 2 million people in the United States, with an estimated 180,000 new cases each year. The medical community cannot predict how well someone with aphasia will respond to treatment, as some people with aphasia are poor responders to intervention even when participating in empirically supported treatments. There is a strong likelihood that genetics play a role in language recovery after stroke, but very little research has been dedicated to investigating this link. This study will investigate whether two genes and cognitive abilities, such as memory, predict responsiveness to aphasia therapy for word-retrieval difficulties.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Incomplete understanding of patient-specific factors that determine whether someone will respond well to language therapy after stroke limits the development of methods to target or account for sources of variability. There is a strong likelihood that genetics play a role in language recovery after stroke, but very little research has been dedicated to investigating this link. The long-term goal of this line of work is to maximize response to aphasia therapy by incorporating patient-specific factors into decisions related to treatment planning. The overall objective of this application is to identify patterns of patient-specific factors including two candidate genes and cognitive skills that show a relationship with treatment outcomes. The central hypothesis is that there will be a relationship between ApoE and BDNF genotypes, and working memory on stimulus generalization. The rationale for the proposed project is that the identification of factors that impact treatment responsiveness will allow for better estimation of prognosis, improved triage of individuals into appropriate therapy regimens and direct targeting of cognitive factors to maximize behavioral gains. The two specific aims of the project are to determine the degree to which (1) ApoE and BDNF genotypes influence how individuals with aphasia respond to therapy, and (2) working memory abilities are related to stimulus acquisition and stimulus generalization after anomia therapy. Individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia will undergo cognitive and language assessment, and provide a saliva sample for genetic analysis prior to participating in a cued picture-naming therapy for anomia. The expected outcomes are to integrate cognitive scores and genotypes for BDNF and ApoE into formulating probabilities of individual patient responsiveness to restorative therapy. Improvement in word retrieval abilities will be evaluated using the percentage of pictures named correctly. This contribution is expected to be significant because it will allow for more informed clinical decision making and better allocation of resources to appropriate treatments, thereby making advances in the field toward more personalized medicine, as opposed to a one-size-fits-all clinical approach.

The investigators will determine genotypes for BDNF and ApoE, which will yield four separate groups. At least 20 participants will be enrolled for each genotype group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aphasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

There will be four subgroups based on the expression of BDNF and ApoE.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Speech-language pathologists who will be providing assessments and therapy will be blinded to participant genotypes.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single Arm Treatment

Cued picture naming therapy will be delivered to all participants. There will be four cohorts of participants based on BDNF and ApoE genotypes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cued picture-naming therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The proposed study will administer Cued Picture-Naming Treatment (CPNT) four days per week for four weeks (i.e. 16 sessions). During therapy, participants will attempt to name eight consecutive presentations of the same black and white picture, for each of the 20 pictures, with cueing from the administrator. Trials will include (1) independent naming, (2) orthographic cueing (i.e. the written word beneath the picture.), (3) repeating, (4) naming after a short delay (i.e. approximately three seconds), (5)semantic cueing (i.e. three cues providing semantic information about the target will be spoken to the participant by the clinician), (6) phonological cueing (i.e. the first sound and letter will be spoken by the clinician), (7) repeating, and (8) naming after a short delay. The administrator will provide the correct response for each incorrect participant response and will ask the participant to repeat it.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cued picture-naming therapy

The proposed study will administer Cued Picture-Naming Treatment (CPNT) four days per week for four weeks (i.e. 16 sessions). During therapy, participants will attempt to name eight consecutive presentations of the same black and white picture, for each of the 20 pictures, with cueing from the administrator. Trials will include (1) independent naming, (2) orthographic cueing (i.e. the written word beneath the picture.), (3) repeating, (4) naming after a short delay (i.e. approximately three seconds), (5)semantic cueing (i.e. three cues providing semantic information about the target will be spoken to the participant by the clinician), (6) phonological cueing (i.e. the first sound and letter will be spoken by the clinician), (7) repeating, and (8) naming after a short delay. The administrator will provide the correct response for each incorrect participant response and will ask the participant to repeat it.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least six months post-onset of a single left-hemisphere stroke
* Chronic aphasia
* Anomia (word-retrieval deficits)
* Native English Speaker.

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe motor speech disorders
* Severe auditory comprehension deficits
* Severe depression.
* Diffuse injury or disease of the brain
* Uncorrected vision or hearing difficulties
* Contraindications for MRI (e.g. cardiac pacemaker, ferrous metal implants, claustrophobia, pregnancy).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nationwide Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ohio State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stacy M Harnish, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ohio State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Stacy Harnish, PhD, CCC-SLP

Role: CONTACT

6146881471

Grace Terry, MA, CFY-SLP

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Stacy Harnish, PhD, CCC-SLP

Role: primary

6146881471

Jennifer Brello, M.Ed., CCC-SLP

Role: backup

6146881188

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

60066189

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neuroplasticity Biomarkers in Aphasia
NCT06471127 RECRUITING NA
Intention Treatment for Anomia
NCT04267198 COMPLETED NA
Stepped Care for Aphasia
NCT05851573 COMPLETED NA