Comparative Effects of Action Observation and Motor Imagery on Upper Limb in Chronic Stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT06108440
Last Updated: 2024-03-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-03
2024-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Action Observation Treatment on Motor Function in Upper Limb of Patients With Chronic Stroke
NCT05084820
Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program Versus Task Based Training on Upper Limb Function in Stroke Patients
NCT06397170
Comparing Perceptual Motor Training and Repetitive Facilitation Exercises on UE in Stroke
NCT06688812
The Impact of App-based Cognitive Training on Post-stroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation
NCT05951530
Long Term Effects of Action Observation Therapy and Mirror Therapy on Upper Limb Functions
NCT06027125
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
action observation training group
Patients in Group A will receive action observation training with conventional treatment.
action observation training
Patients in Group A will receive action observation training with conventional treatment. All participants will undergo the training for 25 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
motor imagery training group
Patients in Group B will receive motor imagery with conventional treatment.
motor imagery training
Patients in Group B will receive motor imagery with conventional treatment. All participants will receive interventions for twenty-five minutes per session, five times a week, for eight weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
action observation training
Patients in Group A will receive action observation training with conventional treatment. All participants will undergo the training for 25 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
motor imagery training
Patients in Group B will receive motor imagery with conventional treatment. All participants will receive interventions for twenty-five minutes per session, five times a week, for eight weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 03 months post stroke
* Score 1+ on modified ashworth scale
* Having a score of 24 or higher in the Mini-Mental State Examination
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of an attached artificial pacemaker
* Presence of a metal implant in the brain
* Presence of visual impairment
* Presence of unilateral neglect in Line bisection test (25)
* Use of antipsychotic drugs
40 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zeest Hashmi, MSNMPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Riphah International University
Lahore, Fedral, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Demartino AM, Rodrigues LC, Gomes RP, Michaelsen SM. Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019 May;26(4):247-254. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1591037. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
Veldema J, Nowak DA, Gharabaghi A. Resting motor threshold in the course of hand motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Nov 3;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00947-8.
Kuriakose D, Xiao Z. Pathophysiology and Treatment of Stroke: Present Status and Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 15;21(20):7609. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207609.
Serlin Y, Shelef I, Knyazer B, Friedman A. Anatomy and physiology of the blood-brain barrier. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015 Feb;38:2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/RCR & AHS/23/0232
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.