Comparison of Effects of Activity Base Therapy vs Strength Training on Gait Performance in Chronic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT04823546

Last Updated: 2021-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-15

Study Completion Date

2020-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide affecting both male and female especially in older people. Functional independence and locomotion are hampered in stroke, therefore, affecting their quality of life. Objective: To find the comparative effects of activity base therapy vs strength training on gait performance in chronic stroke patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It was a randomized controlled trial, conducted in physical therapy department of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital. 20 chronic stroke patients were equally divided into two groups. In group-A patients were treated with activity base therapy and in group-B patients were treated with strength training. Patients were treated for a total of 6 weeks (12 sessions), 1 hour in a day, 3 times per week. Patients were assessed using Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and Fugl Meyer Examination-Lower Extremity (FME-LE). SPSS 25 was used toanalyze the dat

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Activity based therapy

Activity based training was done in 2 phases. exercise involve

1. Standing and reaching
2. Sit-to-stand
3. Stepping forward and backward Phase 2 Phase 2 started after 3 weeks. Phase 2 included the phase 1 exercise along with below exercise.

(10) Walking on a treadmill;

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

activity based therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Standing and reaching (2) Sit-to-stand (3) Stepping forward and backward onto blocks (4) Stepping sideways onto blocks (5) Forward step up onto blocks (6) Raising and lowering of heel (7) Standing with the base of support constrained with feet in parallel and tandem conditions Phase 2 started after 3 weeks. Phase 2 included the phase 1 exercise along with below exercise. (10) Walking on a treadmill; (11) Walking over various surfaces and obstacles;

strength training

Strength training for hip • flexor and extensors and abductors, knee extensors, and ankle dorsi flexors and plantar •flexors. Apart from using body weight, sandbag weights and Therabands of eight different resistances

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Strength Training

Intervention Type OTHER

Strength training included for hip • flexor and extensors and abductors, knee extensors, and ankle dorsi flexors and plantar •flexors. Apart from using body weight, sandbag weights and Therabands of eight different resistances

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

activity based therapy

Standing and reaching (2) Sit-to-stand (3) Stepping forward and backward onto blocks (4) Stepping sideways onto blocks (5) Forward step up onto blocks (6) Raising and lowering of heel (7) Standing with the base of support constrained with feet in parallel and tandem conditions Phase 2 started after 3 weeks. Phase 2 included the phase 1 exercise along with below exercise. (10) Walking on a treadmill; (11) Walking over various surfaces and obstacles;

Intervention Type OTHER

Strength Training

Strength training included for hip • flexor and extensors and abductors, knee extensors, and ankle dorsi flexors and plantar •flexors. Apart from using body weight, sandbag weights and Therabands of eight different resistances

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants were at least 6 months post stroke.
* Ability to walk independent or with help of walking aids
* Ischemic stroke patients included in study.
* Mini mental state examination patients fully understand the commands

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of orthopaedic problems.

* Neurological disorders.
* Psychological problems.
* Cognitive issues.
* People with severe visual issues.
* Participants with other medical complications foot ulcers, orthopaedic or other neurological impedance
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Binash Afzal, PHD*

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah international university lahore campus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Binash afzal

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Saleh MSM, Rehab NI, Aly SMA. Effect of aquatic versus land motor dual task training on balance and gait of patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(4):485-492. doi: 10.3233/NRE-182636.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31256082 (View on PubMed)

Tisserand R, Armand S, Allali G, Schnider A, Baillieul S. Cognitive-motor dual-task interference modulates mediolateral dynamic stability during gait in post-stroke individuals. Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Apr;58:175-184. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29448162 (View on PubMed)

Park HK, Lee HJ, Lee SJ, Lee WH. Land-based and aquatic trunk exercise program improve trunk control, balance and activities of daily living ability in stroke: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Dec;55(6):687-694. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05369-8. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30370752 (View on PubMed)

Lund C, Dalgas U, Gronborg TK, Andersen H, Severinsen K, Riemenschneider M, Overgaard K. Balance and walking performance are improved after resistance and aerobic training in persons with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Oct;40(20):2408-2415. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1336646. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28597708 (View on PubMed)

Lee HS, Park YJ, Park SW. The Effects of Virtual Reality Training on Function in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jun 18;2019:7595639. doi: 10.1155/2019/7595639. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31317037 (View on PubMed)

Lamberti N, Straudi S, Malagoni AM, Argiro M, Felisatti M, Nardini E, Zambon C, Basaglia N, Manfredini F. Effects of low-intensity endurance and resistance training on mobility in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr;53(2):228-239. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04322-7. Epub 2016 Sep 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27626795 (View on PubMed)

Vahlberg B, Cederholm T, Lindmark B, Zetterberg L, Hellstrom K. Short-term and long-term effects of a progressive resistance and balance exercise program in individuals with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Aug;39(16):1615-1622. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1206631. Epub 2016 Jul 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27415645 (View on PubMed)

Wist S, Clivaz J, Sattelmayer M. Muscle strengthening for hemiparesis after stroke: A meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Apr;59(2):114-24. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26969343 (View on PubMed)

Chan K, Phadke CP, Stremler D, Suter L, Pauley T, Ismail F, Boulias C. The effect of water-based exercises on balance in persons post-stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 May;24(4):228-235. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1251742. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27808012 (View on PubMed)

Geiger M, Supiot A, Zory R, Aegerter P, Pradon D, Roche N. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on locomotion and balance in patients with chronic stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Oct 23;18(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2219-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29061169 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC/Lhr/20/2048 Anas Arshad

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.