Circuit Class Training vs. Individual, Task Specific Training in Chronic Stroke Patient

NCT ID: NCT05059704

Last Updated: 2023-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-26

Study Completion Date

2022-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Due to minimal volitional activation of the impaired arm, these individuals are less able to engage in activities of daily living (ADL's). Moreover, simultaneous use of the hand and arm are needed throughout ADL's. The effects of these two approaches (circuit class training and individual task-specific training) on upper extremity function and activities of daily living (ADL's) have not yet been clearly identified, and studies on its effects on chronic stroke patients are limited.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

several research found that circuit training improved various functional parameters after stroke. And most of the circuit based tasks from the published studies were focused on the leg strength, walking speed, distance and balance etc. Previous literature found that circuit class training is effective in improving upper extremity function in chronic stroke patients disregarding the type of stroke and the results of that study are not generalized for chronic stroke patients with upper extremity deficit. Secondly, circuit class training and task-specific training are effective for improving upper limb function following a stroke but in the acute stage. In fact, there is no evidence in which comparison of these two approaches has been done in chronic stroke patients and thirdly, between these two approaches which approach is more effective towards improving upper limb function in chronic stage.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Circuit Class Training

Patients will participate in a total of 1.5hour/day for 8 weeks with a 1:3 (therapist to patient). The circuit will be divided into 5 specific stations, 5 to 10 minutes for warm-up tasks and 15 to 20 minutes on each station as tailored to the patient's activity level

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Circuit Class Training

Intervention Type OTHER

Station 1 will include tasks for warm-up specific for upper extremity, station 2 will include shoulder exercises, station 3 will include elbow exercises, station 4 will include wrist exercises and station 5 will include hand activities and functional training. Variables such as speed, or/and resistance will progressively increase in difficulty according to each patient's ability.

Individual Task specific training

Patients will participate in a total of 1.5hour/day for 8 weeks with 1:1 (therapist to patient) ratio. During each session, all patients will perform 5 to 10 minutes warm-up tasks, then practiced the selected tasks for the rest of the time.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Individual Task specific training

Intervention Type OTHER

Variables such as speed, or/and resistance will progressively increase in difficulty according to each patient's ability.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Circuit Class Training

Station 1 will include tasks for warm-up specific for upper extremity, station 2 will include shoulder exercises, station 3 will include elbow exercises, station 4 will include wrist exercises and station 5 will include hand activities and functional training. Variables such as speed, or/and resistance will progressively increase in difficulty according to each patient's ability.

Intervention Type OTHER

Individual Task specific training

Variables such as speed, or/and resistance will progressively increase in difficulty according to each patient's ability.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Mini-Mental State Examination score more than 24
* Chronic stage (i.e. post-stroke duration of 6 months)
* Single episode of stroke
* MAS of 1 to 3 at upper extremity.
* MRS of ≤ 3 at lower extremity.
* MCA stroke
* Scores 32 to 47 on Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale (FMA-UE)

Exclusion Criteria

* Orthopedic conditions that affect the UE function.
* Other neurological conditions, like PD, MS etc.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT(NMR)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Al Mustafa Trust Medical and Physiotherapy Centre

Dhok Gujra, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC/01036 Farwa Azmat

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.