Compensatory and Restorative Rehabilitation Techniques in Stroke

NCT ID: NCT06325085

Last Updated: 2025-09-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-16

Study Completion Date

2025-08-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to find the combined effects of restorative and compensatory cognitive rehabilitation techniques in mild cognitive impairment after stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stroke is a prevalent medical neurological condition that often results in cognitive impairments, particularly in the domain of executive functions. Cognitive impairment has a significant impact on executive function in stroke subjects. Cognitive impairment on the stroke survivor exist on any single domain such as attention, spatial ability, language and executive ability more frequently than the multiple domains.

Cognitive training has been shown to be beneficial for rehabilitation of patients with cognitive impairment, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

The combination of restorative and compensatory rehabilitation techniques is beneficial for gaining control over cognitive rehabilitation techniques will improve executive functions. The retention effects evaluated additionally will add a broad insight in this regard. It will improve the learning power of brain through neural plasticity. This leads to restoration of everyday functioning. This study aims to investigate the effects of two distinct rehabilitation approaches on the executive functions of stroke survivors with MCI. Understanding how these rehabilitation strategies impact cognitive recovery is essential for individuals living with post-stroke cognitive impairments.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cognitive Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Compensatory and restorative rehabilitation techniques

compensatory and restorative rehabilitation techniques in stroke patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

compensatory and restorative rehabilitation techniques

Intervention Type OTHER

compensatory and restorative rehabilitation techniques Frequency: 10 reps 2-3 times/week for 3 consecutive weeks then evaluation of the effects.

Continue the same techniques for 3 more weeks and then evaluate the retention effects of restorative and compensatory rehabilitation techniques will be evaluated by 9th week.

Traditional cognitive Rehabilitation training

Naming words Counting numbers backwards Spell the word backwards

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Traditional cognitive rehabilitation training

Intervention Type OTHER

Naming words ( ask patient to name food, states, family members) Counting numbers backwards, backward counting of days and months) Spell the word backwards, remembering a piece of information Frequency: 10 reps 2-3 times/week for 3 consecutive weeks then evaluation of the effects.

Continue the same techniques for 3 more weeks and then evaluate the retention effects of restorative and compensatory rehabilitation techniques will be evaluated by 9th week.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

compensatory and restorative rehabilitation techniques

compensatory and restorative rehabilitation techniques Frequency: 10 reps 2-3 times/week for 3 consecutive weeks then evaluation of the effects.

Continue the same techniques for 3 more weeks and then evaluate the retention effects of restorative and compensatory rehabilitation techniques will be evaluated by 9th week.

Intervention Type OTHER

Traditional cognitive rehabilitation training

Naming words ( ask patient to name food, states, family members) Counting numbers backwards, backward counting of days and months) Spell the word backwards, remembering a piece of information Frequency: 10 reps 2-3 times/week for 3 consecutive weeks then evaluation of the effects.

Continue the same techniques for 3 more weeks and then evaluate the retention effects of restorative and compensatory rehabilitation techniques will be evaluated by 9th week.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 50 and 70 years
* Both Genders
* Individuals diagnosed with stroke 6 months before enrollment
* Minimum 6 years of schooling
* Patients with mild cognitive impairment (score 18-25 on MOCA)
* Individuals able to maintain sitting and standing balance (score 41 on berg balance scale)

Exclusion Criteria

* \>10 on post stroke depression rating scale (PSDRS)
* Spasticity (\>3 on Ashworth scale)
* Other psychological disorders
* Patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's and dementia
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aroosa Tariq, MS-NMPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shafi Hospital Dina

Dina, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Ayesha Saddiqa

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.