Effect of Performance-specific Cleft Speech Intervention and Long-term Learning in Children With a Cleft Palate
NCT ID: NCT06105099
Last Updated: 2023-10-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
135 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-10-01
2026-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The first challenge is selecting the best speech approach for a child with a specific cleft speech characteristic (CSC). Many speech therapists use a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to treat compensatory CSCs resulting in poor short- and long-term speech outcomes. To increase the effectiveness and quality of cleft speech care, it is necessary to find the best match between a specific therapy and a given type of CSC. Therefore, this proposal will compare the effect of 3 different speech approaches on the speech and quality of life in Dutch speaking children with different types of CSCs.
The second challenge is selecting the best speech approach to enhance long-term learning and transfer of newly established speech skills to untrained consonants. To date, research mainly focused on immediate therapy effects. It is unknown if permanent speech changes occur. Hence, this project will also investigate the short-term and long-term learning effects (retention and transfer) of the different speech approaches from the first objective.
This proposal will improve evidence-based and patient-tailored cleft speech therapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
High and Low Intensity Speech Intervention in Children With a Cleft Palate: Perceptions of Children, Their Caregivers and Speech-language Pathologists
NCT06895395
Effect and Cost-utility of of High Intensity vs. Low Intensity Speech Intervention in Children With Cleft Palate
NCT06381713
Effect of Infant Sign Training on Speech-language Development
NCT06143254
Delayed Language Development in Children With Cleft Palate at Sohag University Hospital
NCT06151340
Orthognathic Speech Pathology: Phonetic Contrasts of Patients With Dental Discrepancies Pre- and Post-Treatment Analyses
NCT04117360
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
a motor-phonetic approach, a phonological approach, and a combined phonetic-phonological approach) on the speech and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a CP±L and different subtypes of compensatory CSCs (anterior oral CSCs, posterior oral CSCs, or non-oral CSCs) measured by perceptual and psychosocial outcome measures.
Objective 2: To measure the short-term effects (performance to learning) and the long-term learning effects (retention and transfer) of the three different speech therapy approaches (i.e. a motor-phonetic approach, a phonological approach, and a combined phonetic-phonological approach) on the speech and HRQoL in Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a CP±L and different subtypes of compensatory CSCs measured by perceptual and psychosocial outcome measures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Children with anterior oral cleft speech characteristics
To investigate the best speech therapy approach for children with anterior oral cleft speech characteristics, we will provide three different interventions.
Motor-phonetic intervention
Children will receive phonetic articulation therapy treating consonants in a phoneme-by-phoneme basis, emphasizing phonetic placement and shaping techniques.
Phonetic articulation therapy includes a progression of the target consonant from isolated level, syllable level, word level, sentence level, spontaneous speech level in five different steps:
identification of the target consonant using visual, tactile, and auditory feedback techniques, discrimination between the used and targeted consonant, (3) variation and correction, (4) stabilize the target, and (5) maintenance of the target. A next level will be introduced when the child is able to correctly produce the sound in 90% of the time with minimal cues from the therapist.
Phonological intervention
The phonological approach consists of two phases. In the first phase, the child's attention is drawn to the contrastive features of the speech sound system which are relevant to the target consonants. Terms that describe the sound features will be introduced using words on the child's level, e.g. in the case of active nasal fricatives the words 'nose' and 'mouth' will be used. Child-friendly games will be played to illustrate the contrast between the concepts followed by activities that focus on the contrasts in non-speech sounds, in which child and therapist will alternate between being listener and speaker. At the end of this phase, minimal word pairs (e.g. tap/cap), only produced by the therapist, will be used to facilitate the child's awareness of sounds in words and meaningful differences based on distinctive features.
In the second phase, the child will produce minimal pairs providing the opportunity to monitor his/her speech and to make self-corrections.
Combined phonetic-phonological intervention
Children will receive motor-phonetic articulation therapy supplemented with phonological principles. Therapy will be provided following the same five steps as the 'motor-phonetic group'. However, articulation errors will not be treated in a phoneme-by-phoneme basis. In contrast, multiple errors will be targeted simultaneously by focusing on a process. For example, if the child produces glottal stops for the /t/ and the /p/, these sounds will be treated simultaneously as sounds requiring oral front placements. Exercises will be embedded in meaningful language contexts such as minimal pairs
Children with posterior oral cleft speech characteristics
To investigate the best speech therapy approach for children with potserior oral cleft speech characteristics, we will provide three different interventions.
Motor-phonetic intervention
Children will receive phonetic articulation therapy treating consonants in a phoneme-by-phoneme basis, emphasizing phonetic placement and shaping techniques.
Phonetic articulation therapy includes a progression of the target consonant from isolated level, syllable level, word level, sentence level, spontaneous speech level in five different steps:
identification of the target consonant using visual, tactile, and auditory feedback techniques, discrimination between the used and targeted consonant, (3) variation and correction, (4) stabilize the target, and (5) maintenance of the target. A next level will be introduced when the child is able to correctly produce the sound in 90% of the time with minimal cues from the therapist.
Phonological intervention
The phonological approach consists of two phases. In the first phase, the child's attention is drawn to the contrastive features of the speech sound system which are relevant to the target consonants. Terms that describe the sound features will be introduced using words on the child's level, e.g. in the case of active nasal fricatives the words 'nose' and 'mouth' will be used. Child-friendly games will be played to illustrate the contrast between the concepts followed by activities that focus on the contrasts in non-speech sounds, in which child and therapist will alternate between being listener and speaker. At the end of this phase, minimal word pairs (e.g. tap/cap), only produced by the therapist, will be used to facilitate the child's awareness of sounds in words and meaningful differences based on distinctive features.
In the second phase, the child will produce minimal pairs providing the opportunity to monitor his/her speech and to make self-corrections.
Combined phonetic-phonological intervention
Children will receive motor-phonetic articulation therapy supplemented with phonological principles. Therapy will be provided following the same five steps as the 'motor-phonetic group'. However, articulation errors will not be treated in a phoneme-by-phoneme basis. In contrast, multiple errors will be targeted simultaneously by focusing on a process. For example, if the child produces glottal stops for the /t/ and the /p/, these sounds will be treated simultaneously as sounds requiring oral front placements. Exercises will be embedded in meaningful language contexts such as minimal pairs
Children with non-oral cleft speech characteristics
To investigate the best speech therapy approach for children with non-oral cleft speech characteristics, we will provide three different interventions.
Motor-phonetic intervention
Children will receive phonetic articulation therapy treating consonants in a phoneme-by-phoneme basis, emphasizing phonetic placement and shaping techniques.
Phonetic articulation therapy includes a progression of the target consonant from isolated level, syllable level, word level, sentence level, spontaneous speech level in five different steps:
identification of the target consonant using visual, tactile, and auditory feedback techniques, discrimination between the used and targeted consonant, (3) variation and correction, (4) stabilize the target, and (5) maintenance of the target. A next level will be introduced when the child is able to correctly produce the sound in 90% of the time with minimal cues from the therapist.
Phonological intervention
The phonological approach consists of two phases. In the first phase, the child's attention is drawn to the contrastive features of the speech sound system which are relevant to the target consonants. Terms that describe the sound features will be introduced using words on the child's level, e.g. in the case of active nasal fricatives the words 'nose' and 'mouth' will be used. Child-friendly games will be played to illustrate the contrast between the concepts followed by activities that focus on the contrasts in non-speech sounds, in which child and therapist will alternate between being listener and speaker. At the end of this phase, minimal word pairs (e.g. tap/cap), only produced by the therapist, will be used to facilitate the child's awareness of sounds in words and meaningful differences based on distinctive features.
In the second phase, the child will produce minimal pairs providing the opportunity to monitor his/her speech and to make self-corrections.
Combined phonetic-phonological intervention
Children will receive motor-phonetic articulation therapy supplemented with phonological principles. Therapy will be provided following the same five steps as the 'motor-phonetic group'. However, articulation errors will not be treated in a phoneme-by-phoneme basis. In contrast, multiple errors will be targeted simultaneously by focusing on a process. For example, if the child produces glottal stops for the /t/ and the /p/, these sounds will be treated simultaneously as sounds requiring oral front placements. Exercises will be embedded in meaningful language contexts such as minimal pairs
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Motor-phonetic intervention
Children will receive phonetic articulation therapy treating consonants in a phoneme-by-phoneme basis, emphasizing phonetic placement and shaping techniques.
Phonetic articulation therapy includes a progression of the target consonant from isolated level, syllable level, word level, sentence level, spontaneous speech level in five different steps:
identification of the target consonant using visual, tactile, and auditory feedback techniques, discrimination between the used and targeted consonant, (3) variation and correction, (4) stabilize the target, and (5) maintenance of the target. A next level will be introduced when the child is able to correctly produce the sound in 90% of the time with minimal cues from the therapist.
Phonological intervention
The phonological approach consists of two phases. In the first phase, the child's attention is drawn to the contrastive features of the speech sound system which are relevant to the target consonants. Terms that describe the sound features will be introduced using words on the child's level, e.g. in the case of active nasal fricatives the words 'nose' and 'mouth' will be used. Child-friendly games will be played to illustrate the contrast between the concepts followed by activities that focus on the contrasts in non-speech sounds, in which child and therapist will alternate between being listener and speaker. At the end of this phase, minimal word pairs (e.g. tap/cap), only produced by the therapist, will be used to facilitate the child's awareness of sounds in words and meaningful differences based on distinctive features.
In the second phase, the child will produce minimal pairs providing the opportunity to monitor his/her speech and to make self-corrections.
Combined phonetic-phonological intervention
Children will receive motor-phonetic articulation therapy supplemented with phonological principles. Therapy will be provided following the same five steps as the 'motor-phonetic group'. However, articulation errors will not be treated in a phoneme-by-phoneme basis. In contrast, multiple errors will be targeted simultaneously by focusing on a process. For example, if the child produces glottal stops for the /t/ and the /p/, these sounds will be treated simultaneously as sounds requiring oral front placements. Exercises will be embedded in meaningful language contexts such as minimal pairs
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged between 4 and 12 years
* Presence of at least one compensatory speech error in their speech based on the perceptual assessment of one experienced speech-language pathologist
Exclusion Criteria
* Oronasal fistula
* Velopharyngeal insufficiency
* Hearing disabilities based on pure tone audiometry (\>25 dB HL)
* Cognitive and/or related learning disabilities or neuromuscular disorders
4 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Research Foundation Flanders
OTHER
University Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
Ghent, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12ZO323N
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.