Effect and Cost-utility of of High Intensity vs. Low Intensity Speech Intervention in Children With Cleft Palate

NCT ID: NCT06381713

Last Updated: 2025-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-26

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Achieving speech that is understandable and acceptable to others is the key outcome in cleft treatment. Therefore, speech therapy provided by a speech-language pathologist is necessary. This intervention is traditionally provided twice per week for 30 minutes for months or even years by first-line speech-language pathologists. Unfortunately, this low intensity intervention is based on a historical context rather than scientific evidence. This means that current speech therapy knows several shortcomings including poor outcomes, treatment fatigue and high costs related to year-long therapy. Because of these issues, the use of high intensity speech intervention is proposed. Even though solid proof-of-concepts exist for this model, it has not yet found its way into clinical practice.

Before this intensity can be implemented and utilized in clinical practice, the effect of this novel program on a larger societal scale must be determined. This project will compare the effect of high intensity and low intensity speech intervention in children with a cleft palate in terms of speech, quality of life, and cost-utility as provided by first-line speech-language pathologists by conducting a large-scale randomized controlled trial. The final goal is to utilize this program in clinical practice and to create awareness of the benefits for children with a cleft palate among stakeholders.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective 1: Conduct a large-scale randomized controlled trial to compare the short- and long-term sustainable effects of two different speech intervention intensities (i.e. high intensity speech intervention: 5x30 min/week during 2x4 weeks (2x10 hours) and low intensity speech intervention: 2x30 min/week during 20 weeks (20 hours)) on the speech and quality of life in Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip. Speech intervention will be provided by first-line speech language pathologists in private practices who will receive thorough training before the onset of the trial.

Hypothesis 1: Based on the state-of-the-art and our proof-of-concept, it is assumed that 20 hours of high intensity speech intervention will lead to superior speech outcomes and health-related quality of life compared to 20 hours of low intensity speech intervention.

Objective 2: To compare the cost-utility in quality-adjusted life years of two different speech intervention intensities (i.e. high intensity speech intervention: 5x30 min/week during 2x4 weeks (2x10 hours) and low intensity speech intervention: 2x30 min/week during 20 weeks (20 hours)) in Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip. Demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of high intensity speech intervention will facilitate implementation and utilization of this protocol in clinical practice as less money has to be spent in order to gain one life year in full health (QALY) when providing high intensity speech intervention compared to low intensity speech intervention.

Hypothesis 2: Besides the superior speech outcomes and health related quality of life in a shorter intervention time (cfr. hypothesis 1), it is hypothesized that less money has to be spent in order to gain one life year in full health (QALY) in the high intensity intervention group. In other words, it is hypothesized that high intensity intervention will be more cost-effective compared to low intensity speech intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cleft Palate Children Speech Therapy Speech Disorders in Children Cleft Lip and Palate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High intensive speech therapy

To investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of speech therapy for children with a cleft palate (with of without a cleft lip), we will provide a high-intensive speech intervention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High intensive combined phonetic-phonological intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Children will receive phonetic articulation therapy supplemented by phonological principles. Consonants will be treated with emphasis on phonetic placement and shaping techniques. Phonetic articulation therapy includes five different steps:(1) identification of the target consonant using visual, tactile, and auditory feedback techniques,(2) discrimination between the used and targeted consonant, (3) variation and correction, (4) stabilize the target, and (5) maintenance of the target. A next level will be introduced when the child is able to correctly produce the sound in 80% of the time with minimal cues from the therapist. Multiple errors will be targeted simultaneously by focusing on a process. Child-friendly games will be played to illustrate the contrast between concepts, for example glottal 'throat' sounds and oral 'mouth' sounds. Exercises will be embedded in meaningful language contexts such as minimal pairs.

Therapy will be provided 5 times 30' per week for 2 times 4 weeks.

Low intensive speech therapy

To investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of speech therapy for children with a cleft palate (with of without a cleft lip), we will provide a low-intensive speech intervention.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Low intensive combined phonetic-phonological intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Children will receive phonetic articulation therapy supplemented by phonological principles. Consonants will be treated with emphasis on phonetic placement and shaping techniques. Phonetic articulation therapy includes five different steps:(1) identification of the target consonant using visual, tactile, and auditory feedback techniques,(2) discrimination between the used and targeted consonant, (3) variation and correction, (4) stabilize the target, and (5) maintenance of the target. A next level will be introduced when the child is able to correctly produce the sound in 80% of the time with minimal cues from the therapist. Multiple errors will be targeted simultaneously by focusing on a process. Child-friendly games will be played to illustrate the contrast between concepts, for example glottal 'throat' sounds and oral 'mouth' sounds. Exercises will be embedded in meaningful language contexts such as minimal pairs.

Therapy will be provided 2 times 30' per week for 20 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High intensive combined phonetic-phonological intervention

Children will receive phonetic articulation therapy supplemented by phonological principles. Consonants will be treated with emphasis on phonetic placement and shaping techniques. Phonetic articulation therapy includes five different steps:(1) identification of the target consonant using visual, tactile, and auditory feedback techniques,(2) discrimination between the used and targeted consonant, (3) variation and correction, (4) stabilize the target, and (5) maintenance of the target. A next level will be introduced when the child is able to correctly produce the sound in 80% of the time with minimal cues from the therapist. Multiple errors will be targeted simultaneously by focusing on a process. Child-friendly games will be played to illustrate the contrast between concepts, for example glottal 'throat' sounds and oral 'mouth' sounds. Exercises will be embedded in meaningful language contexts such as minimal pairs.

Therapy will be provided 5 times 30' per week for 2 times 4 weeks.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Low intensive combined phonetic-phonological intervention

Children will receive phonetic articulation therapy supplemented by phonological principles. Consonants will be treated with emphasis on phonetic placement and shaping techniques. Phonetic articulation therapy includes five different steps:(1) identification of the target consonant using visual, tactile, and auditory feedback techniques,(2) discrimination between the used and targeted consonant, (3) variation and correction, (4) stabilize the target, and (5) maintenance of the target. A next level will be introduced when the child is able to correctly produce the sound in 80% of the time with minimal cues from the therapist. Multiple errors will be targeted simultaneously by focusing on a process. Child-friendly games will be played to illustrate the contrast between concepts, for example glottal 'throat' sounds and oral 'mouth' sounds. Exercises will be embedded in meaningful language contexts such as minimal pairs.

Therapy will be provided 2 times 30' per week for 20 weeks.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip
* Aged between 4 and 12 years,
* Presence of at least one compensatory speech error in their speech based on the perceptual assessment of one experienced speech-language pathologist

Exclusion Criteria

* Children with syndromic clefts
* Oronasal fistula
* Velopharyngeal insufficiency
* Hearing disabilities based on pure tone audiometry (\>25 dB HL)
* Cognitive and/or related learning disabilities or neuromuscular disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Research Foundation Flanders

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kristiane Van Lierde, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Ghent

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fien Allemeersch

Role: CONTACT

+32474128135

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kristiane Van Lierde

Role: primary

+3293320530

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ONZ-2024-0158

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Book Sharing for Toddlers With Clefts
NCT06338319 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA