Very Preterm Children With Language Delay and Parent Intervention

NCT ID: NCT02042235

Last Updated: 2020-03-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

67 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2018-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In studies of children born at term, language delay at the age of 2 years exhibits a spontaneously favourable course in 30 to 50% by the age of 3 years. In France, there is no recommendation for speech therapy before the age of 3 years. However, for term-born children, parent-implemented language interventions conducted during the third year of life have already shown a positive short-term effect on language skills. In these interventions, a skilled interventionist, generally a speech therapist, teaches parents how to use specific language strategies with their child.

The investigators' hypothesis is that such parent-implemented interventions would be particularly appropriate at short and medium term for the improvement of linguistic performances in very preterm children, a population with a high prevalence of early language delay. Currently, there is an opportunity to partly nest an intervention trial in a national prospective population-based cohort of very preterm children, the EPIPAGE (Etude EPIdémiologique sur les Petits Ages GEstationnels) 2 cohort, which has included 5 000 babies born alive in France in 2011. This situation provides considerable methodological advantages.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

EPILANG is an open randomized controlled study, in which the final assessment of the children (endpoint) will be conducted by professionals blinded to the treatment group.

Some eligible children will first be screened using the parental questionnaire at 24 months corrected age (CA) of the EPIPAGE 2 cohort. Children with language delay, defined as no words combination and/or less than 30 words from Mac Arthur CDI - short version, and free of exclusion criteria, will be invited to an inclusion visit at 30 months CA, if they are in an EPIPAGE 2 centre participating in the EPILANG trial.

During the inclusion visit, inclusion criteria and the absence of exclusion criteria will be checked, data useful for the study will be collected, and the informed consent of the parents collected. The child will then be randomized either in the control or the intervention group if language delay is still present, defined by a score \< 10th percentile at the Mac Arthur CDI. Twins, if both included, will be included in the same group, otherwise only the twin with a language delay will be randomized.

The intervention is organized in 15 weekly one-hour sessions with the child, one or both parents and a speech therapist recruited and trained for the study. Maximum duration for the intervention will be 6 months per child, because some sessions can be missed or delayed. Parents' participation will be recorded.

The usual "wait-and-see" attitude will be provided to the control group, together with basic advice to enhance the child's language at home.

In both groups, audition will be checked by an otolaryngology specialist, following professional recommendations, and care will be provided in case of hearing deficit, if appropriate.

At 3 years CA, a neuropsychological evaluation will be performed by trained psychologists for both groups, blinded for the allocation group. Behaviour will be evaluated with a validated parental questionnaire.

The analysis will be according to intention to treat.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Preterm Birth Language Development Speech Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Parent-implemented language intervention

In the intervention group, the techniques and attitudes favouring use of oral language will be taught to the parents during 15 sessions with the parent(s) and child.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Parent-implemented intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In order to achieve the programme of parent-implemented language intervention, a detailed protocol for speech therapists recruited and trained for the present study has been established. The techniques and attitudes favouring use of oral language will be taught to the parents during 15 sessions with the parent(s) and child.

Control group

The control group will benefit from the actual routine care for children with language delay before the age of 3 years. In order to provide them the best routine care, the psychologist will provide some advice to the parents to enhance their child's language (e.g.: using life situations to talk with the child and encourage him/her to talk …).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Parent-implemented intervention

In order to achieve the programme of parent-implemented language intervention, a detailed protocol for speech therapists recruited and trained for the present study has been established. The techniques and attitudes favouring use of oral language will be taught to the parents during 15 sessions with the parent(s) and child.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Child born at 24 to 31+6 weeks' gestation, whose parents did not refuse collection of follow-up data
* Child aged 30 ± 2 months corrected age (CA) at inclusion
* Child with language delay at 24 months CA, defined as the absence of word combination and/or expressive vocabulary of less than 30 words according to the short version of the French Mac Arthur Communication Developmental Inventories (CDI), whose language delay is confirmed at 30 months CA i.e. without word combination and/or an expressive vocabulary below the 10th percentile on the French CDI.
* Child with a global Developmental Quotient (DQ) ≥ 55 at 30 months CA
* Child whose parents accept participation in this study
* Child with French health insurance coverage

Exclusion Criteria

* Child with neurological sequelae (delay or disability) and who is unable to walk without assistance at 24 months CA or who has a global DQ \< 55 on the revised Brunet-Lézine (BLR) scale at 30 months CA.
* Blindness
* Deafness defined by the prescription of a hearing aid
* Child with a chromosomal or other condition that could interfere with language development
* Parents who do not speak French at all
* Triplets
Minimum Eligible Age

28 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

32 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministry of Health, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lille Catholic University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amélie Lansiaux, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Groupment des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille

Marie-Laure Charkaluk, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul, GHICL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier

Arras, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

Caen, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul (GHICL)

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital femme mère enfant

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

Nantes, , France

Site Status

AP-HP Hôpital Antoine Béclère

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Necker

Paris, , France

Site Status

HôpitalCochin - Port Royal

Paris, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier

Roubaix, , France

Site Status

Centre hospitalier Universitaire

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

Tours, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier

Valenciennes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RC-P0027

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.