Pain Management After Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT06086483

Last Updated: 2023-10-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

361 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-18

Study Completion Date

2023-08-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial sought to evaluate the efficacy of the iPACK block with Adductor Canal Block on postoperative pain, functional recovery and NLR and PLR levels.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee, or iPACK block, together with the Adductor Canal block (ACB), has been described and shows promise in providing analgesia to the knee joint. However, the effect of these two blocks on postoperative pain levels, functional recovery, and stress response is uncertain. This study compares a preoperative iPACK and ACB block to Sham blocks before total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis Knee Arthritis Knee Arthropathy Knee Pain Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

iPACK block+ABC block

Patients received a preoperative ultrasound-guided iPACK block with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine and an Adductor Canal block with 20mL 0.25% ropivacaine.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected into the PENG block

20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected into the Adductor Canal block

Sham blocks

Patients received a preoperative ultrasound-guided iPACK block with 20 mL of 0.9% normal saline and an Adductor Canal block with 20mL 0.9% normal saline.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.9%sodium chloride

Intervention Type DRUG

20 mL 0.9% sodium chloride was injected into the PENG block

20 mL 0.5% sodium chloride was injected into the Adductor Canal block

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution

20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected into the PENG block

20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected into the Adductor Canal block

Intervention Type DRUG

0.9%sodium chloride

20 mL 0.9% sodium chloride was injected into the PENG block

20 mL 0.5% sodium chloride was injected into the Adductor Canal block

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ropimol normal saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients \> 18 years old undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria

* refusal to participate
* \< 18 yo
* Chronic opioid use
* localized infection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zbigniew Żaba, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Emergency Medicine Clinic

Malgorzata Domagalska, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Poznan, Poznań, Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

495/2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adductor Canal Block
NCT04513145 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3
Block and Periarticular Injection Study
NCT06410612 COMPLETED PHASE4