Block and Periarticular Injection Study

NCT ID: NCT06410612

Last Updated: 2025-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-04

Study Completion Date

2025-05-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to compare two types of perioperative analgesic modalities, adductor canal block plus interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block and periarticular injection versus periarticular injection alone, to determine their relative efficacies with regard to pain relief and functional outcomes in the early postoperative period following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The widespread adoption of multimodal analgesia in contemporary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to improvements in perioperative pain control, expedited recovery times, and shorter hospital stays1-3. Periarticular injections (PAIs), adductor canal blocks (ACBs), and interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) blocks are commonly utilized as part of contemporary multimodal analgesia protocols, but their relative efficacies in improving early recovery after TKA has yet to be definitively elucidated4. There are a few known potential drawbacks of ACBs and IPACKs including surgical delay due to administration timing, increased costs, and small risks associated with a regional block. Both regional anesthesia and PAI have been found to be effective alone in improving pain and opioid consumption, but there is limited data on whether there is an additive benefit of providing both treatments for patients undergoing primary TKA. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to compare the efficacy of regional anesthesia and PAI vs. PAI alone for pain management and functional recovery in the early postoperative period following TKA.

Design Prospective randomized trial

Treatment Groups All ACBs will be administered as a single shot preoperatively in the holding area on the day of surgery by the regional anesthesia team and PAIs will be administered intraoperatively by the treating orthopaedic surgeon.

Group 1: regional anesthesia (ACB + IPACK) and PAI Group 2: PAI alone

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

patients will be randomized into 2 groups.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
patients will not know which group they are in

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Block and Periarticular injection

regional anesthesia (Adductor canal block +IPACK) and Periarticular injection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

regional anesthesia and PAI

Intervention Type DRUG

this is the block portion of the study

PAI

Intervention Type DRUG

this is the no block portion of the study

Periarticular injectin alone

Periarticular injection alone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PAI

Intervention Type DRUG

this is the no block portion of the study

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

regional anesthesia and PAI

this is the block portion of the study

Intervention Type DRUG

PAI

this is the no block portion of the study

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

adductor canal block periarticular injection Periarticular injections

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Planning to undergo Unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty.
* 18 and up
* Willing to sign informed consent
* Willing to return for all follow-up visits
* Smartphone or tablet device capable of running the FocusMotion platform

Exclusion Criteria

* BMI \> 45
* Preexisting functionally limiting neurologic disorders
* Hepatic or renal insufficiency
* History of unprovoked venous thromboembolism
* Inability to complete baseline functional testing
* Chronic opioid or gabapentin and pregabalin use (chronic defined as use \>5 days per week prior to the surgical procedure)
* Allergy or intolerance to trial medications
* Planned admission to a postoperative rehabilitation facility
* Planned general anesthesia
* Receiving workers compensation or disability payments
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew Schneider, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington University School of Medicine

Creve Coeur, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202311211

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adductor Canal Block
NCT04513145 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3