Protocol Based Selective Imaging Versus Routine Computed Tomography or Ultrasound in Suspected Appendicitis
NCT ID: NCT06083064
Last Updated: 2025-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
900 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-11-15
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Does protocol based selective imaging using clinical scoring affect clinical outcome?
* Does protocol based selective observation combined with score based selective imaging affect clinical outcome?
Participants will be randomized into three groups:
* Selective imaging based on Adult Appendicitis Score
* Selective observation based on Appendicitis Severity Score combined with selective imaging based on Adult Appendicitis Score
* Routine imaging using ultrasound and/or computed tomography
Researchers will compare selective imaging groups separately with routine imaging to see if number of negative appendectomies or number of complicated appendicitis is not significantly increased.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in Early Equivocal appeNDicitis
NCT02742402
Comparative Study of Microwave Radiometry and Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
NCT02108340
Computer Tomography (CT) Trial of Acute Abdomen
NCT00870766
Optimizing the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
NCT04117061
Comparing Proposed Algorithm and Current Practice in the Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis
NCT03324165
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Routine imaging
Patients will have first abdominal ultrasound, and if findings are negative or inconclusive for appendicitis abdominal CT scan is made. If ultrasound is not available, CT scan can be the first imaging study. If appendicitis is found in the imaging study patient is scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. Other patients are discharged or treated according to possible alternative diagnosis.
Abdominal imaging
Abdominal ultrasound and/or abdominal CT
Adult Appendicitis Score based selective imaging
Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) is calculated as soon as possible. Patients with AAS 16 or higher are scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with AAS 11- 15 will have abdominal imaging as in the group 1. If appendicitis is found in the imaging study patient is scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with AAS 10 or less are discharged without imaging studies.
Score based selective abdominal imaging
Abdominal imaging is done selectively based on Adult Appendicitis Score
Appendicitis Severity Score based observation with selective imaging using Adult Appendicitis Score
Patients with Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) 10 or less are discharged without imaging studies. Patients with AAS 11 or more are managed based on Appendicitis Severity Score (ASS). ASS is used to identify patients with low risk of complicated disease. Patients with high ASS (\>4) are managed as patients in arm 2. Patients with low ASS (\<=4) begin observation protocol where patients can leave hospital and they are re-evaluated with repeated scoring after 12-24 hours from randomization. After re-scoring patients may be discharged if AAS is below 16 and decreasing and ASS is below 5 or if AAS is below 11. If AAS is 16 or higher or increasing, patients are scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. After observation period, patients with decreasing AAS between 11-15 and ASS higher than 4 or patients with stable AAS between 11-15 are send for imaging study.
Score based selective observation combined with selective abdominal imaging
Observation based on Appendicitis Severity Score combined Adult Appendicitis Score based selective abdominal imaging
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Abdominal imaging
Abdominal ultrasound and/or abdominal CT
Score based selective abdominal imaging
Abdominal imaging is done selectively based on Adult Appendicitis Score
Score based selective observation combined with selective abdominal imaging
Observation based on Appendicitis Severity Score combined Adult Appendicitis Score based selective abdominal imaging
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Age \<18 years
* Pregnancy, ruled out by serum or urine HCG measurement in 18- to 49-year-old women
* CT-scan or ultrasound already done within the last 3 days (72 hours)
* Clinical suspicion of other disease or other reason to perform imaging study
* Recruited earlier to the same trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Helsinki University Central Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Panu Mentula
M.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Panu Mentula, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
HUS, Jorvi Hospital
Espoo, , Finland
HUS, Meilahti Hospital
Helsinki, , Finland
HUS, Hyvinkää Hospital
Hyvinkää, , Finland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Hanna Lampela, MD
Role: primary
Panu J Mentula, MD
Role: primary
Hanna Koppatz, MD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis--a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 26;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-114.
Lastunen KS, Leppaniemi AK, Mentula PJ. DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in early equivocal appeNDicitis (DIAMOND): open-label, randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2022 Jun 14;109(7):588-594. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac120.
Atema JJ, van Rossem CC, Leeuwenburgh MM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2015 Jul;102(8):979-90. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9835. Epub 2015 May 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HUS/74/2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.