Protocol Based Selective Imaging Versus Routine Computed Tomography or Ultrasound in Suspected Appendicitis

NCT ID: NCT06083064

Last Updated: 2025-03-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

900 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-15

Study Completion Date

2028-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare protocol based selective imaging to routine imaging in adult patients with suspected appendicitis. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

* Does protocol based selective imaging using clinical scoring affect clinical outcome?
* Does protocol based selective observation combined with score based selective imaging affect clinical outcome?

Participants will be randomized into three groups:

* Selective imaging based on Adult Appendicitis Score
* Selective observation based on Appendicitis Severity Score combined with selective imaging based on Adult Appendicitis Score
* Routine imaging using ultrasound and/or computed tomography

Researchers will compare selective imaging groups separately with routine imaging to see if number of negative appendectomies or number of complicated appendicitis is not significantly increased.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Appendicitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

1:1:1
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Routine imaging

Patients will have first abdominal ultrasound, and if findings are negative or inconclusive for appendicitis abdominal CT scan is made. If ultrasound is not available, CT scan can be the first imaging study. If appendicitis is found in the imaging study patient is scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. Other patients are discharged or treated according to possible alternative diagnosis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Abdominal imaging

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Abdominal ultrasound and/or abdominal CT

Adult Appendicitis Score based selective imaging

Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) is calculated as soon as possible. Patients with AAS 16 or higher are scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with AAS 11- 15 will have abdominal imaging as in the group 1. If appendicitis is found in the imaging study patient is scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with AAS 10 or less are discharged without imaging studies.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Score based selective abdominal imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Abdominal imaging is done selectively based on Adult Appendicitis Score

Appendicitis Severity Score based observation with selective imaging using Adult Appendicitis Score

Patients with Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) 10 or less are discharged without imaging studies. Patients with AAS 11 or more are managed based on Appendicitis Severity Score (ASS). ASS is used to identify patients with low risk of complicated disease. Patients with high ASS (\>4) are managed as patients in arm 2. Patients with low ASS (\<=4) begin observation protocol where patients can leave hospital and they are re-evaluated with repeated scoring after 12-24 hours from randomization. After re-scoring patients may be discharged if AAS is below 16 and decreasing and ASS is below 5 or if AAS is below 11. If AAS is 16 or higher or increasing, patients are scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. After observation period, patients with decreasing AAS between 11-15 and ASS higher than 4 or patients with stable AAS between 11-15 are send for imaging study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Score based selective observation combined with selective abdominal imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Observation based on Appendicitis Severity Score combined Adult Appendicitis Score based selective abdominal imaging

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abdominal imaging

Abdominal ultrasound and/or abdominal CT

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Score based selective abdominal imaging

Abdominal imaging is done selectively based on Adult Appendicitis Score

Intervention Type OTHER

Score based selective observation combined with selective abdominal imaging

Observation based on Appendicitis Severity Score combined Adult Appendicitis Score based selective abdominal imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Suspicion of appendicitis

Exclusion Criteria

* Time from symptom onset over 72 hours
* Age \<18 years
* Pregnancy, ruled out by serum or urine HCG measurement in 18- to 49-year-old women
* CT-scan or ultrasound already done within the last 3 days (72 hours)
* Clinical suspicion of other disease or other reason to perform imaging study
* Recruited earlier to the same trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helsinki University Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Panu Mentula

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Panu Mentula, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HUS, Jorvi Hospital

Espoo, , Finland

Site Status RECRUITING

HUS, Meilahti Hospital

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status RECRUITING

HUS, Hyvinkää Hospital

Hyvinkää, , Finland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Panu Mentula, MD

Role: CONTACT

504270183 ext. +358

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hanna Lampela, MD

Role: primary

Panu J Mentula, MD

Role: primary

Hanna Koppatz, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis--a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 26;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-114.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24970111 (View on PubMed)

Lastunen KS, Leppaniemi AK, Mentula PJ. DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in early equivocal appeNDicitis (DIAMOND): open-label, randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2022 Jun 14;109(7):588-594. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac120.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35482016 (View on PubMed)

Atema JJ, van Rossem CC, Leeuwenburgh MM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2015 Jul;102(8):979-90. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9835. Epub 2015 May 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25963411 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HUS/74/2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study About Contrast Media
NCT05678023 RECRUITING NA
MR Urography vs CT Urography
NCT02606513 COMPLETED NA