DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in Early Equivocal appeNDicitis

NCT ID: NCT02742402

Last Updated: 2021-08-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

185 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2021-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether patients with early equivocal appendicitis can be observed instead of immediate diagnostic imaging. Half of the patients are randomly assigned to observation group, while the other half will undergo diagnostic imaging. The hypothesis is that resolving appendicitis is common in these patients. Thus, in observation group there will be fewer patients with appendicitis diagnosis and observation reduces the use of diagnostic imaging and surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For the study equivocal appendicitis is defined as clinical suspicion of appendicitis with Adult Appendicitis Score between 11 and 15. The estimated prevalence of appendicitis in such patients is around 50%.

Diagnostic imaging is done using conditional computed tomography i.e. abdominal ultrasound first and computed tomography only after negative or inconclusive appendicitis after ultrasound.

In observation group repeated clinical examination is done after 6-8 hours interval with repeated blood test for calculation of Adult Appendicitis Score. Patients with decreasing score value continue observation without imaging, whereas patients with the same score value or higher (but below 16) undergo diagnostic imaging as in other group. Laparoscopy is done without imaging in patients with high score (16 or higher). Antibiotics are not allowed, but prophylactic antibiotics during induction of anesthesia are allowed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Appendicitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Observation

Clinical follow-up for at least 6-8 hours, after follow-up repeated laboratory tests and repeated clinical examination is done. Adult Appendicitis Score is calculated after observation to determine further actions. Observation is continued in patients with decreasing score. Patients with the same or higher score undergo diagnostic imaging (score 11-15) or laparoscopy (score 16 or higher). Diagnostic imaging is abdominal ultrasound first and if the result is inconclusive or negative for appendicitis abdominal computed tomography is done. Laparoscopic appendectomy is done for those patients with appendicitis in diagnostic imaging.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Observation

Intervention Type OTHER

Observation for 6 to 8 hours. After observation period repeated clinical examination and repeated blood test for calculation of Adult Appendicitis Score is done.

Diagnostic imaging

Patients undergo abdominal ultrasound and if the result is inconclusive or negative for appendicitis patients will have abdominal computed tomography. Laparoscopic appendectomy is done for patients with appendicitis in diagnostic imaging.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Diagnostic imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Abdominal ultrasound, followed by abdominal computed tomography when necessary

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diagnostic imaging

Abdominal ultrasound, followed by abdominal computed tomography when necessary

Intervention Type OTHER

Observation

Observation for 6 to 8 hours. After observation period repeated clinical examination and repeated blood test for calculation of Adult Appendicitis Score is done.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis
* Equivocal appendicitis defined by Adult Appendicitis Score: Score ≥11 and ≤15.

Exclusion Criteria

* C-reactive protein \>99 mg/l
* Time from symptom onset over 24 hours
* Pregnancy
* Antibiotics given within last 24 hours
* Suspicion of other disease than appendicitis, that would require immediate interventions such as surgery, diagnostic imaging or gynecologic consultation
* Missing written informed consent
* Patient randomized earlier to the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helsinki University Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Panu Mentula

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Panu J Mentula, M.D. Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Helsinki University Central Hospital, Meilahti Hospital

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis--a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 26;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-114.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24970111 (View on PubMed)

Lastunen KS, Leppaniemi AK, Mentula PJ. DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in early equivocal appeNDicitis (DIAMOND): open-label, randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2022 Jun 14;109(7):588-594. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac120.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35482016 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.appendicitisscore.com/

Online calculator for Adult Appendicitis Score

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HUS/95/2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

IA Model for Acute Appendicitis in CT
NCT06175169 RECRUITING NA
Study About Contrast Media
NCT05678023 RECRUITING NA