Post Gingival Depigmentation Assessment: Comparison of Surgical Stripping vs (Er,Cr:YSGG) Laser

NCT ID: NCT06075641

Last Updated: 2023-10-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-01

Study Completion Date

2021-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The appearance and health of the gingiva significantly contribute to an aesthetically pleasing smile. Pink gingiva indicates healthy gums and is generally preferred over dark or mixed colors. However, gingival color varies among individuals based on factors such as race, geography, gum health, epithelial thickness, vascular supply, keratinization level, and pigments in the epithelium layers.

Four primary pigments define mucosa color: melanin, oxygenated hemoglobin (Hb), carotenoids, and reduced Hb. Melanin notably affects excessive gingival pigmentation. Gingival melanin hyperpigmentation, sometimes called racial pigmentation, is a genetic trait present in many ethnic groups due to excess melanin deposition in the epithelial layers. While not a medical concern, this hyperpigmentation can be unattractive, especially for those with a gummy smile. As a result, many seek treatments to reduce or eliminate this pigmentation.

Various methods for gingival depigmentation exist, including surgical scraping, scalpel technique, bur abrasion, free gingival graft, gingivectomy, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, chemical treatments, and lasers. A significant challenge with these treatments is gingival repigmentation or the reappearance of melanin post-procedure.

For years, the scalpel technique was the standard. It's a straightforward and economical method that involves removing the gingival epithelium and some underlying tissue. Although it promotes quick healing, the procedure can cause bleeding, necessitating local anesthesia and post-operative dressings. Due to the associated discomfort, researchers have sought equally effective alternatives.

Laser ablation has become a popular choice among dental professionals and patients. Lasers like carbon dioxide (CO2), diode, argon, ruby, Nd:YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) , and Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) have been proven effective through numerous studies. Lasers present benefits such as minimal post-operative pain, ease of use, and quicker treatment times. Recurrence rates post-laser surgery (1.16%) are lower than with the scalpel technique (4.25%). However, lasers also have downsides, including high costs, potential for thermal damage, and the risk of deep penetration.

One laser, the Erbium-chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG), has been FDA-approved for certain dental procedures but hasn't been widely used for gingival depigmentation. Preliminary findings suggest it offers advantages like reduced pain and faster healing compared to other lasers. In a case study involving two patients, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser effectively removed gingival pigmentation, with no recurrence observed after six months.

This clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and recurrence rates between the conventional scalpel technique and the Er,Cr:YSGG laser technique. The hypothesis suggests that the Er,Cr:YSGG laser might be a superior treatment for gingival hyperpigmentation compared to other methods.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pigmentation Gingiva

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgical Stripping

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Gingival depigmentation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Gingival depigmentation is the most widely used periodontal procedure to remove or reduce the melanotic areas. Various techniques can be employed to effectively carry out the depigmentation procedure, including surgical scraping, scalpel technique, bur abrasion, free gingival graft, gingivectomy, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, chemical therapies, and different types of lasers

Erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) Laser Techniques

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gingival depigmentation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Gingival depigmentation is the most widely used periodontal procedure to remove or reduce the melanotic areas. Various techniques can be employed to effectively carry out the depigmentation procedure, including surgical scraping, scalpel technique, bur abrasion, free gingival graft, gingivectomy, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, chemical therapies, and different types of lasers

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gingival depigmentation

Gingival depigmentation is the most widely used periodontal procedure to remove or reduce the melanotic areas. Various techniques can be employed to effectively carry out the depigmentation procedure, including surgical scraping, scalpel technique, bur abrasion, free gingival graft, gingivectomy, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, chemical therapies, and different types of lasers

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Over 18 years of age
* Periodontally healthy subjects with concerns about their esthetics and presence of gingival hyperpigmentation in the upper arch

Exclusion Criteria

* (1) smokers or were previous smokers
* (2) had a systemic disease/condition,
* (3) were pregnant/lactating
* (4) had gingivitis, periodontitis or any other periodontal disease
* (5) acquired amalgam pigmentation were excluded from the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King Abdulaziz University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Talal Zahid

Chairman of Periodontology Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

077-16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.