Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Post-bleaching Sensitivity and Color Change

NCT ID: NCT03514290

Last Updated: 2018-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-11

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate low-level laser (LLL) therapy in tooth sensitivity and in effecting color change after in-officer bleaching treatment across three weeks of treatment.

Methods: Twenty-one volunteers were evaluated through the split-mouth model, so that the right and left maxillary/mandibular quadrants were randomized and allocated to one of two groups: GPLACEBO - the laser tip was positioned without the emission of light (placebo effect) + tooth bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP); GLASER - treated with LLL + tooth bleaching with 35% HP. To assess tooth sensitivity, a modified visual analogue scale (VAS) was used after an evaporative stimulus (stimulated pain) and a daily pain questionnaire (unstimulated pain) was also applied. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the color. Three bleaching sessions were performed, with intervals of 7 days. Sensitivity results were tested using Friedman test for intra-group evaluation and Wilcoxon test for inter-group evaluation and ANOVA for color change.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Twenty-one volunteers were evaluated through the split-mouth model, so that the right and left maxillary/mandibular quadrants were randomized and allocated to one of two groups: GPLACEBO - the laser tip was positioned without the emission of light (placebo effect) + tooth bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP); GLASER - treated with LLL + tooth bleaching with 35% HP. To assess tooth sensitivity, a modified visual analogue scale (VAS) was used after an evaporative stimulus (stimulated pain) and a daily pain questionnaire (unstimulated pain) was also applied. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the color. Three bleaching sessions were performed, with intervals of 7 days.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tooth Bleaching Low-level Laser Therapy Dentin Sensitivity Clinical Trial

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Twenty-one volunteers were evaluated through the split-mouth model, so that the right and left maxillary/mandibular quadrants were randomized and allocated to one of two groups: GPLACEBO - the laser tip was positioned without the emission of light (placebo effect) + tooth bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP); GLASER - treated with LLL + tooth bleaching with 35% HP.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Only principal investigator performed the clinical research steps. A single evaluator performed the assessment of the dental sensitivity without knowing which treatment was applied. The volunteers evaluated in this study also did not know which hemi-arch received the LLL.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GPLACEBO

the laser tip was positioned without the emission of light (placebo effect) + tooth bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP).

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Tooth bleaching

Intervention Type OTHER

Three 15-minute applications of 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (Whiteness HP, FGM®, Joinville, SC, Brazil) were carried out, totaling 45 minutes in each of the four bleaching sessions, with an one-week interval between applications.

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

The laser tip was positioned similarly to experimental group but without light irradiation

GLASER

treated with Low-lever laser + tooth bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Low-lever laser

Intervention Type RADIATION

Received Low-lever laser therapy using the infrared spectrum, with a wavelength of 808 nm in its active medium AsGaAl (arsenic-gallium-aluminum), at two points: on the central of cervical and medial regions of incisors, canines and premolars in the corresponding hemi-arch. At each point, 60 J/cm2 was applied during 16 seconds with an irradiance of 3.75 W/cm² using the therapeutic visible infrared device.

Tooth bleaching

Intervention Type OTHER

Three 15-minute applications of 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (Whiteness HP, FGM®, Joinville, SC, Brazil) were carried out, totaling 45 minutes in each of the four bleaching sessions, with an one-week interval between applications.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Low-lever laser

Received Low-lever laser therapy using the infrared spectrum, with a wavelength of 808 nm in its active medium AsGaAl (arsenic-gallium-aluminum), at two points: on the central of cervical and medial regions of incisors, canines and premolars in the corresponding hemi-arch. At each point, 60 J/cm2 was applied during 16 seconds with an irradiance of 3.75 W/cm² using the therapeutic visible infrared device.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Tooth bleaching

Three 15-minute applications of 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (Whiteness HP, FGM®, Joinville, SC, Brazil) were carried out, totaling 45 minutes in each of the four bleaching sessions, with an one-week interval between applications.

Intervention Type OTHER

Placebo

The laser tip was positioned similarly to experimental group but without light irradiation

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Laserterapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Do not have previous dental sensitivity
* The canine had to be shade A2 or darker.

Exclusion Criteria

* Enamel hypoplasia
* Gingival recession
* Dentin exposure
* Visible cracks on buccal enamel
* Pulpitis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Federal do Para

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cecy Martins Silva

Full professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cecy M Silva

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of Para

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Federal University of Pará

Belém, Pará, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UFPara-003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.