Polyetherketoneketone and Metal Framework for Management of Maxillectomy Cases: Across Over Study
NCT ID: NCT06070727
Last Updated: 2023-10-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-04
2024-08-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Fiber-Reinforced Composites on Quality of Life and Bone Height in Maxillary Implant Arches
NCT06576778
A Comparative Study Between Three Different Plating Techniques in Management of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures.
NCT06323122
Prosthetic Management of All on Four Versus All on Six to Rehabilitate Completely Edentulous Maxillary Ridge Opposed by Natural Teeth
NCT06114069
Clinical Assessment of Computer-assisted PEEK Versus Conventional Titanium Plates on Mandibular Body Fractures
NCT03466190
Digital Occlusal Wafer Versus Waferless Distal Segment Repositioning for BSSO in Skeletal Mandibular Deformities
NCT05151042
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) has been widely tested in a number of dental applications, such as PEKK dental implants, PEKK obturators, and PEEK RPD frameworks. PEKK has a relatively low Young's modulus of 3 to 4 GPa, which is close to that of human bones, and its tensile properties are similar to those of bone, enamel, and dentin. These properties make it a suitable material for fixed and removable prostheses.(6-8) PEKK is a lightweight material with excellent biocompatibility as it can be used in combination with Computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in fabrication of maxillofacial prostheses.(9) So the aim of this study will be, evaluation of Patient satisfaction and oral healthy related quality of life of PEKK and metal framework for management of maxillectomy cases. The null hypothesis is that, there would be no significant difference between both frameworks.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Metal framework group
group A: Patients will receive metallic framework with obturator for 6 months, then the metallic obturator will be replaced by PEKK obturator for another 6 months.
Obturator
Evaluation of patient satisfaction and oral healthy related quality of life of Polyetherketoneketone(PEKK) and metal framework for management of maxillectomy cases.
PEKK framework group
Group B: Patients will receive PEKK obturator for 6 months, then the same patients will receive metallic framework obturator for another 6 months.
Obturator
Evaluation of patient satisfaction and oral healthy related quality of life of Polyetherketoneketone(PEKK) and metal framework for management of maxillectomy cases.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Obturator
Evaluation of patient satisfaction and oral healthy related quality of life of Polyetherketoneketone(PEKK) and metal framework for management of maxillectomy cases.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with unilateral total maxillectomy.
* Patients will have sufficient number of remaining teeth.
* Free from any signs of inflammation in defect area.
* Patient 3 years after receiving radiation.
* The defect size is small or large.
* Patient with susceptibility of recurrence.
Exclusion Criteria
* Defect result from trauma.
30 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mohammed ELSawy
Al Mansurah, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M0107023RP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.