Efficacy of Different Osseodensification Techniques

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-01

Study Completion Date

2025-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

different possible osseodensification techniques used to improve bone density around dental implants, using either \] osseodensifying drills, reverse drilling of conventional drills, and rotary expanders.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Osseodensification Versus Motor-Driven Expanders' Techniques for Increasing Bone Density With Simultaneous Implant Placement

NCT04609475

Alveolar Bone Loss

COMPLETED NA

Evaluation of Implant Stability in Low Quality Bone Following the Use of Osseodensifiers Versus Ridge Expanders

NCT05330546

Low Bone Density

COMPLETED NA

Assessment of Dental Implants Placed in Posterior Maxillary Ridge Using Densah Burs Versus Standard Drills

NCT03598049

Implant Site Reaction

UNKNOWN NA

Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome

NCT04688957

Maxillary Sinus Lift

UNKNOWN NA

Efficiency of Using Osseodensification Protocol

NCT06426719

Alveolar Bone Resorption

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

the study include 3 groups with different implant drilling protocols; group 1 where osseodensifying burs are used, group 2 where conventional drills with reverse motion are used, group 3 where rotary expanders are used

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osseodensification

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

osseodensifying burs

osseodensifying burs are used in reverse motion .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

osseodenification with osseodensifying burs

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

different osseodensification techniques to be studied

reverse drilling

using conventional implant drills in reverse motion(anti clock wise)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

reverse drilling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

using the conventional drills in reverse mode

rotary expanders

using rotary expanders in clock wise motion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

rotary expanders

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

expanders in clockwise direction

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

osseodenification with osseodensifying burs

different osseodensification techniques to be studied

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

reverse drilling

using the conventional drills in reverse mode

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

rotary expanders

expanders in clockwise direction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* · Adult osteoporotic female patients confirmed by CBCT grey values ranging from 290 to 420 HU, with age range 45-60 years.

* Patients should be free from any other systemic diseases, according to ASA classifications (American society of Anesthesiologists).
* Patients of single or multiple missing teeth in the posterior mandible.
* A ridge width of 4mm and a height of \> 8mm above the roof of Inferior Alveolar canal.
* No buccal concavities were present at the planned implant site

Exclusion Criteria

* · Poor oral hygiene.

* Heavy smoker (more than 20 cigarettes /day),or alcoholic abusing patients.
* Radiation therapy to the head and neck region, or chemotherapy in the last 6 months prior to the implant placement.

Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No