MedDataX Logo

Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome

NCT ID: NCT04688957

Last Updated: 2020-12-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-12

Study Completion Date

2021-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

implant placement in the posterior maxilla is problematic, not only due to inferior properties of bone but also due to loss of vertical bone height which happens after extraction of posterior teeth. when the required additional height is few millimeters, indirect transcresta sinus lifting procedures are recommended.

This study compares sinus lifting using the conventional osteotome versus the osseodensification with densah burs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

a total of 12 patients with missing maxillary premolars or molars and with limited vertical bone height below the maxillary sinus floor will receive implants either with osteotome or with Densah burs transcrestal sinus lifting to compare clinically and radiographically transcrestal sinus lifting with Densah burs and osteotome with simultaneous implant placement

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Maxillary Sinus Lift

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

osteotome sinus lifting

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

osteotome sinus lifting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

drilling implant site with consecutive drills short of the sinus floor by 1-2mm , using osteotome in appropriate size and application of one tap until sinus floor is elevated, using the final drill for the desired implant diameter

oseodensification sinus lifting

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

oseodensification sinus lifting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

application of first densah bur with densifying mood (reverse) counterclockwise, 1200 revolution per minute until the sinus is reached then use a wider densah bur with the same mode and bouncing motion to elevate the sinus floor up to 3 mm in 1mm increments.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

oseodensification sinus lifting

application of first densah bur with densifying mood (reverse) counterclockwise, 1200 revolution per minute until the sinus is reached then use a wider densah bur with the same mode and bouncing motion to elevate the sinus floor up to 3 mm in 1mm increments.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

osteotome sinus lifting

drilling implant site with consecutive drills short of the sinus floor by 1-2mm , using osteotome in appropriate size and application of one tap until sinus floor is elevated, using the final drill for the desired implant diameter

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with missing maxillary premolas and molars
* Vertical bone height of 5-8 mm
* Non smokers
* Good oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria

* Bad oral hygiene
* maxillary sinusitis
* Presence of infection or periapical lesions in adjacent teeth
* Bruxism or clenching
* Alcoholism
* Medically compromised patients with a condition that affect the procedure
* Multiple sinus septa
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

Assistant lecturer of DPH and Clinical statistician

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohammed T Elghobashy, BDS

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 011121158436

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mohammed T Elghobashy, BDS

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elghobashy MTM, Shaaban AM, Melek LNF. Radiographic comparison between Densah burs and osteotome for graftless internal sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Mar;52(3):388-395. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.06.020. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35840446 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

osseodensifcation

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id