Effectiveness in Limiting the Need to Elevate the Maxillary Sinus
NCT ID: NCT03357705
Last Updated: 2019-03-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-10-31
2018-12-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation With Xenogeneic Bone Graft Associated or Not With Fibrin Rich in Platelets and Leukocytes Produced by Horizontal Centrifugation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT05957705
Influence of Anatomy of Maxillary Sinus on New Bone Formation After Transcrestal Augmentation Procedures
NCT03209284
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Via the "Bone Lid Technique"
NCT06222970
Non Grafted Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation With Implant Placement Versus the Use of Short Endosseous Implants
NCT03661957
Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Cortico-cancellous Porcine Bone
NCT06970184
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Various grafting materials have been used to perform alveolar retention with the aim of limiting the contraction of bone volumes and improving bone formation: autologous bone, homologous bone and bone substitutes of heterologous origin or alloplastic.
The use of autologous bone in alveolar preservation was soon abandoned for bone marrow morbidity, especially when deciding to use a donor site other than the extraction area. The homologous bone, although showing excellent results, is still to date problematic use in Italy. The heterologous grafts have been widely used for alveolar preservation; however, especially if bovine bone is used, significant percentages of graft (up to 25%) are histologically observable at 9 months from graft.
For these reasons, in this study it was decided to use as a graft in Group A a synthetic material (nanocrystalline synthetic hydroxyapatite) and in group B a collagen of bovine origin.
Bovine collagen, while having reduced dimensional stability over time, has the advantage of contributing to stabilizing the clot, an essential basis for bone healing, and is completely replaced by newly formed tissue in a short time. Synthetic hydroxyapatite, used as a biomaterial, has shown ability to stimulate osteoconduction and is slowly but completely replaced over time by newly formed bone, thus providing a great capacity for maintaining volumes.
Moreover, nanostructured porous hydroxyapatite appear to favor adhesion of bone matrix proteins and promote differentiation of osteogenetic cells. Although the nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in a silica gel matrix has already been successfully tested as a clotting material in the maxillary sinus, the behavior of pure sintered nano-hydroxyapatite granules has not yet been evaluated in terms of osteoconductive potential and dimensional stability in time at post-mining sites.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
synthetic
alveolar ridge preservation with synthetic bone
alveolar ridge preservation with synthetic bone
after tooth extraction
collagen
alveolar ridge preservation with bovine collagen
alveolar ridge preservation with bovine collagen
after tooth extraction
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
alveolar ridge preservation with synthetic bone
after tooth extraction
alveolar ridge preservation with bovine collagen
after tooth extraction
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. "three-rooted" anatomy of the first or second upper molar to be extracted so that it can have an inter-radicular septum that allows a precise measurement of the height of the bone ridge from the septum itself and from the walls of the 3 alveoli to the floor of the maxillary sinus;
3. Extraction of intercalate molar or last arch element;
Exclusion Criteria
2. contextual extraction of the molar and one or more contiguous elements
3. apical lesions with a diameter of\> 3 mm or cystic lesions with respect to the element to be extracted
4. root fracture which has produced resorption or bone fenestration
1\) acute myocardial infarction in the last six months; 2) uncontrolled clotting disorders; 3) uncontrolled diabetes (HBA1c\> 7.5%); 4) radiotherapy in the head / neck district for the last 24 months; 5) immunocompromise (eg HIV infection or chemotherapy over the last 3 years); 6) treatment in progress or with bisphosphonates via e.v .; 7) autoimmune diseases in chronic therapy with methotrexate or other immunosuppressive drugs; 8) allergy to bovine collagen; 9) psychological or psychiatric problems; 10) abuse of alcohol or drug use; 11) uncontrolled periodontal disease;
19 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
International Piezosurgery Academy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mr. Claudio Stacchi, DDS, MSc
President of the International Piezosurgery Academy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Claudio Stacchi, Dr
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Piezosurgery Academy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Piezosurgery Academy
Parma, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Carlsson GE, Bergman B, Hedegard B. Changes in contour of the maxillary alveolar process under immediate dentures. A longitudinal clinical and x-ray cephalometric study covering 5 years. Acta Odontol Scand. 1967 Jun;25(1):45-75. doi: 10.3109/00016356709072522. No abstract available.
Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):48-56.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SO-GHI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.