Inducible Displacements of the Sacroiliac Joint Measured With CTMA
NCT ID: NCT06065644
Last Updated: 2023-10-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-01
2024-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Detecting Malposition of Trans-pedicle Screw From AP and LAT Plain Radiographs
NCT04784923
Identification of Microcirculation and Inflammation After Posterior Stabilization of the Spine
NCT01266200
Low-dose Digital Radiographs in the Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT03464318
Proximal Femur Image Database Validation
NCT06351943
Development and Validation of Intraoperative Image-quality Criteria
NCT01660490
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* The SI movement will not increase because of long fixation down to sacrum, the SIJ will not work as an adjacent level and not compensatory increase the movement.
* The increased movement will not result in low back pain and /or pseudo radicular pain to the lower limbs CTMA is a high accuracy measuring method comparable to RSA. With a precision of RSA of 1 degree for rotation we need 10 patients in each group to detect a difference of 2 degrees for power of 90% on an alpha = 99% confidence level. Taking drop-outs into account we need a group size of 15 resulting in 30 patients (Two- sided T-test).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Long fixation
CT in a neutral and then by provocation (anterior straight leg raise and figure-of-four).
CTMA
Induced displacement of the Sacroiliac joint
One segment fixation
CT in a neutral and then by provocation (anterior straight leg raise and figure-of-four).
CTMA
Induced displacement of the Sacroiliac joint
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CTMA
Induced displacement of the Sacroiliac joint
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* One segment fixations in the level of L4/5 regardless of olisthesis.
Exclusion Criteria
* Do not want to participate and not able to answer PROMs
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oslo University Hospital
OTHER
University of Bergen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephan M. Röhrl, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Oslo University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ullevål University Hospital
Oslo, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Axelsson P, Karlsson BS. Intervertebral mobility in the progressive degenerative process. A radiostereometric analysis. Eur Spine J. 2004 Oct;13(6):567-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0713-5. Epub 2004 May 19.
Fayyazi AH, Ordway NR, Park SA, Fredrickson BE, Yonemura K, Yuan HA. Radiostereometric analysis of postoperative motion after application of dynesys dynamic posterior stabilization system for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jun;23(4):236-41. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181a4bb0b.
Nabhan A, Al-Yhary A, Ishak B, Steudel WI, Kollmar O, Steimer O. Analysis of spinal kinematics following implantation of lumbar spine disc prostheses versus fusion: radiological study. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2007;17(3):207-16. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v17.i3.40.
Sturesson B, Uden A, Vleeming A. A radiostereometric analysis of the movements of the sacroiliac joints in the reciprocal straddle position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jan 15;25(2):214-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200001150-00012.
Sturesson B, Uden A, Vleeming A. A radiostereometric analysis of movements of the sacroiliac joints during the standing hip flexion test. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Feb 1;25(3):364-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00018.
Zoega B, Karrholm J, Lind B. Plate fixation adds stability to two-level anterior fusion in the cervical spine: a randomized study using radiostereometry. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(4):302-7. doi: 10.1007/s005860050079.
Broden C, Olivecrona H, Maguire GQ Jr, Noz ME, Zeleznik MP, Skoldenberg O. Accuracy and Precision of Three-Dimensional Low Dose CT Compared to Standard RSA in Acetabular Cups: An Experimental Study. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5909741. doi: 10.1155/2016/5909741. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
Broden C, Sandberg O, Skoldenberg O, Stigbrand H, Hanni M, Giles JW, Emery R, Lazarinis S, Nystrom A, Olivecrona H. Low-dose CT-based implant motion analysis is a precise tool for early migration measurements of hip cups: a clinical study of 24 patients. Acta Orthop. 2020 Jun;91(3):260-265. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1725345. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
Nagamoto Y, Iwasaki M, Sakaura H, Sugiura T, Fujimori T, Matsuo Y, Kashii M, Murase T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. Sacroiliac joint motion in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Aug;23(2):209-16. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14590. Epub 2015 May 15.
Forsth P, Svedmark P, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Zeleznik MP, Sanden B. Motion Analysis in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Feasibility Study of the 3DCT Technique Comparing Laminectomy Versus Bilateral Laminotomy. Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Oct;31(8):E397-E402. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000677.
Svedmark P, Berg S, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Zeleznik MP, Weidenhielm L, Nemeth G, Olivecrona H. A New CT Method for Assessing 3D Movements in Lumbar Facet Joints and Vertebrae in Patients before and after TDR. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:260703. doi: 10.1155/2015/260703. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
Svedmark P, Tullberg T, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Zeleznik MP, Weidenhielm L, Nemeth G, Olivecrona H. Three-dimensional movements of the lumbar spine facet joints and segmental movements: in vivo examinations of normal subjects with a new non-invasive method. Eur Spine J. 2012 Apr;21(4):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1988-y. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
Eriksson T, Maguire GQ Jr, Noz ME, Zeleznik MP, Olivecrona H, Shalabi A, Hanni M. Are low-dose CT scans a satisfactory substitute for stereoradiographs for migration studies? A preclinical test of low-dose CT scanning protocols and their application in a pilot patient. Acta Radiol. 2019 Dec;60(12):1643-1652. doi: 10.1177/0284185119844166. Epub 2019 May 1. No abstract available.
Kibsgard TJ, Rohrl SM, Roise O, Sturesson B, Stuge B. Movement of the sacroiliac joint during the Active Straight Leg Raise test in patients with long-lasting severe sacroiliac joint pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017 Aug;47:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 29.
Kibsgard TJ, Roise O, Stuge B, Rohrl SM. Precision and accuracy measurement of radiostereometric analysis applied to movement of the sacroiliac joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3187-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2413-5. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IDSCT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.