Assessment of the Feasibility of Using a Preoperative Surgical Fracture Analysis Tool

NCT ID: NCT07193524

Last Updated: 2025-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-10

Study Completion Date

2028-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate a preoperative fracture analysis tool that uses 3D visualization and biomechanical modeling to assist surgeons in planning screw and plate fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. By simulating different fixation strategies based on patient-specific CT data, the tool provides insights into construct stability, potentially improving surgical precision and reducing intraoperative uncertainty. The study also investigates the tool's feasibility within current clinical workflows without altering the standard of care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tibia Fractures Trauma (Including Fractures) Surgical Planning

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3D Analysis Group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3D Fracture Analysis Tool

Intervention Type DEVICE

Based on a pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scan, fractured bone fragments of a proximal tibia are segmented and aligned to achieve adequate fracture reduction.

Bone material properties for each fragment are derived from Hounsfield Units (HU) of the CT scan, based on internal density calibration with air, fat, muscle, and cortical bone. Screws and implants are then modelled based on the manufacturer's design and material properties Placement of off-the-shelf plate and screws can be analyzed and support a personalized plan on how to individually treat a patient with a specific fracture pattern and anatomical biometric data.

Surgeons can define up to three approaches (different placement of implants and screws) to be visualized and analyzed for construct stability.

The surgeons will receive a visualization of the fracture, fracture-reduction, implant and screw placement in 3D as well as a comparison of construct stabilites of the submitted approaches

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3D Fracture Analysis Tool

Based on a pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scan, fractured bone fragments of a proximal tibia are segmented and aligned to achieve adequate fracture reduction.

Bone material properties for each fragment are derived from Hounsfield Units (HU) of the CT scan, based on internal density calibration with air, fat, muscle, and cortical bone. Screws and implants are then modelled based on the manufacturer's design and material properties Placement of off-the-shelf plate and screws can be analyzed and support a personalized plan on how to individually treat a patient with a specific fracture pattern and anatomical biometric data.

Surgeons can define up to three approaches (different placement of implants and screws) to be visualized and analyzed for construct stability.

The surgeons will receive a visualization of the fracture, fracture-reduction, implant and screw placement in 3D as well as a comparison of construct stabilites of the submitted approaches

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age above 18
* lower extremity fracture
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Derek S. Stenquist, MD

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Derek Stenquist, MD

Role: primary

617-726-9111

Nishant Suneja, MD

Role: primary

(617) 732-5465

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024P003282

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

New Tools for Assessing Fracture Risk
NCT02436356 TERMINATED NA
S-32 PG 242 Short Stem
NCT05083728 COMPLETED