Utility of Cortical Bone Tissue Properties in the Assessment of Fracture Risk

NCT ID: NCT03076034

Last Updated: 2025-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

190 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-26

Study Completion Date

2028-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to determine whether a new minimally invasive method for in vivo measurement of cortical bone tissue properties can identify those who are at risk for fragility fractures of the hip and radius. The investigators hypothesis is that women with fragility fractures of the hip and radius have altered cortical bone tissue properties compared to non-fracture controls independent of standard clinical tests, such as bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this study is to determine whether a new minimally invasive method for in vivo measurement of cortical bone tissue properties can identify those who are at risk for fragility fractures of the hip and radius. The investigators hypothesis is that women with fragility fractures of the hip and radius have altered cortical bone tissue properties compared to non-fracture controls independent of standard clinical tests, such as BMD. To test these hypotheses, The investigators propose two aims:

Aim 1: Compare cortical bone tissue properties as assessed in vivo by reference point indentation in women with hip fractures and non-fracture controls.

The investigators will compare cortical bone tissue material properties, as assessed by novel in vivo indentation at the mid-tibia in postmenopausal women with recent hip fractures (n) and age-similar controls without fractures (n=). In addition to in vivo indentation measurements, The investigators will assess hip and spine BMD by DXA; as well as other factors that may influence risk of fractures (e.g, vit D status, medication use and physical activity). Hypotheses: Postmenopausal women with hip fractures will have worse bone tissue material properties compared to non-fracture controls even after adjustment for BMD and other potential confounders.

Aim 2: Compare cortical bone tissue properties as assessed in vivo by reference point indentation in women with distal radius fractures to non-fracture controls.

The investigators will compare cortical bone tissue material properties, as assessed by novel in vivo indentation at the mid-tibia in postmenopausal women with recent distal radius fractures (n) and age-similar controls without fractures (n=). In addition to in vivo indentation measurements, The investigators will assess hip and spine BMD by DXA; as well as other factors that may influence risk of fractures (e.g, vit D status, medication use and physical activity). Hypotheses: Postmenopausal women with distal radius fractures will have worse bone tissue material properties compared to non-fracture controls even after adjustment for BMD and other potential confounders.

Successful completion of this project will address the need to better assess bone mechanical properties at the tissue level in order to accurately predict fracture risk. The study will provide novel information about possible clinical utility of minimally invasive, in vivo bone indentation measurements to measure bone strength and its relationship to fracture risk.

Aim 3: An amendment to the protocol expanded the study population to now include males \>50 years who present with distal radius fractures and those who present for a reason other than fracture (non-fracture controls). Hypotheses: Men \>50 years with distal radius fractures will have worse bone tissue material properties compared to non-fracture controls even after adjustment for BMD and other potential confounders.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Distal Radius Fracture Osteoporosis Hip Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Observational
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Post-menopausal women

We will use the handheld Osteoprobe device to measure cortical bone reference point indentation properties.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reference Point Indentation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The "Osteoprobe": Since these first reports of indentation measurements in humans in vivo, a more 'user-friendly' device, the Osteoprobe® has been developed by Active Life Scientific (Santa Barbara, CA) (10). The Osteoprobe®, which we will use in the current study, is smaller than the previous reference point indentation (RPI) instrument and is designed to be used in a hand-held fashion to allow for rapid measurements. The new instrument does not require a reference probe, because the inertia of the instrument keeps it adequately fixed in space during the short time of the indentation impact (\~0.25 milliseconds). The main parameter measured is the distance that the probe further indents into the bone from the reference point. Key components of the Osteoprobe® include an impact generation mechanism, a displacement transducer, and a probe made of hardened stainless steel with a 90 degree conical tip, with a tip diameter of \~375 µm.

Males over 50 years

We will recruit males to this second study arm, to use the handheld Osteoprobe device to measure cortical bone reference point indentation properties.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reference Point Indentation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The "Osteoprobe": Since these first reports of indentation measurements in humans in vivo, a more 'user-friendly' device, the Osteoprobe® has been developed by Active Life Scientific (Santa Barbara, CA) (10). The Osteoprobe®, which we will use in the current study, is smaller than the previous reference point indentation (RPI) instrument and is designed to be used in a hand-held fashion to allow for rapid measurements. The new instrument does not require a reference probe, because the inertia of the instrument keeps it adequately fixed in space during the short time of the indentation impact (\~0.25 milliseconds). The main parameter measured is the distance that the probe further indents into the bone from the reference point. Key components of the Osteoprobe® include an impact generation mechanism, a displacement transducer, and a probe made of hardened stainless steel with a 90 degree conical tip, with a tip diameter of \~375 µm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reference Point Indentation

The "Osteoprobe": Since these first reports of indentation measurements in humans in vivo, a more 'user-friendly' device, the Osteoprobe® has been developed by Active Life Scientific (Santa Barbara, CA) (10). The Osteoprobe®, which we will use in the current study, is smaller than the previous reference point indentation (RPI) instrument and is designed to be used in a hand-held fashion to allow for rapid measurements. The new instrument does not require a reference probe, because the inertia of the instrument keeps it adequately fixed in space during the short time of the indentation impact (\~0.25 milliseconds). The main parameter measured is the distance that the probe further indents into the bone from the reference point. Key components of the Osteoprobe® include an impact generation mechanism, a displacement transducer, and a probe made of hardened stainless steel with a 90 degree conical tip, with a tip diameter of \~375 µm.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Osteoprobe

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women with hip and wrist fractures within 2 weeks of presentation
* Non-fracture controls

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to undergo BMD by DXA or high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT)
* History of skeletal metastasis, primary hyperparathyroidism, Paget's disease, multiple myeloma
* Treatment with bisphosphonate, estrogen (within previous 3 years), teriparatide therapy, calcitonin, selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERMs,within previous 3 years)
* Use of glucocorticoids continuously for more than 3 months, use of anticonvulsants
* Prior fracture in adulthood (\>age 18) for healthy controls

Amendment to protocol added Arm 2, to include males \>50 years with otherwise similar eligibility criteria.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tamara Rozental

Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tamara Rozental, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014P000226

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Image Guided System for Orthopaedic Surgery
NCT00022802 TERMINATED PHASE2