Utility of Cortical Bone Tissue Properties in the Assessment of Fracture Risk
NCT ID: NCT03076034
Last Updated: 2025-10-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
190 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-26
2028-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of the Feasibility of Using a Preoperative Surgical Fracture Analysis Tool
NCT07193524
Hand-held Optical Coherence Tomography Feasibility Older Hip Fracture
NCT04041336
New Tools for Assessing Fracture Risk
NCT02436356
Tomosynthesis Use in Detecting Subtle Occult Hip Fractures
NCT02133794
Influence of Osteoporosis on Clinical Outcomes of Mini-invasive Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures
NCT02750839
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1: Compare cortical bone tissue properties as assessed in vivo by reference point indentation in women with hip fractures and non-fracture controls.
The investigators will compare cortical bone tissue material properties, as assessed by novel in vivo indentation at the mid-tibia in postmenopausal women with recent hip fractures (n) and age-similar controls without fractures (n=). In addition to in vivo indentation measurements, The investigators will assess hip and spine BMD by DXA; as well as other factors that may influence risk of fractures (e.g, vit D status, medication use and physical activity). Hypotheses: Postmenopausal women with hip fractures will have worse bone tissue material properties compared to non-fracture controls even after adjustment for BMD and other potential confounders.
Aim 2: Compare cortical bone tissue properties as assessed in vivo by reference point indentation in women with distal radius fractures to non-fracture controls.
The investigators will compare cortical bone tissue material properties, as assessed by novel in vivo indentation at the mid-tibia in postmenopausal women with recent distal radius fractures (n) and age-similar controls without fractures (n=). In addition to in vivo indentation measurements, The investigators will assess hip and spine BMD by DXA; as well as other factors that may influence risk of fractures (e.g, vit D status, medication use and physical activity). Hypotheses: Postmenopausal women with distal radius fractures will have worse bone tissue material properties compared to non-fracture controls even after adjustment for BMD and other potential confounders.
Successful completion of this project will address the need to better assess bone mechanical properties at the tissue level in order to accurately predict fracture risk. The study will provide novel information about possible clinical utility of minimally invasive, in vivo bone indentation measurements to measure bone strength and its relationship to fracture risk.
Aim 3: An amendment to the protocol expanded the study population to now include males \>50 years who present with distal radius fractures and those who present for a reason other than fracture (non-fracture controls). Hypotheses: Men \>50 years with distal radius fractures will have worse bone tissue material properties compared to non-fracture controls even after adjustment for BMD and other potential confounders.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Post-menopausal women
We will use the handheld Osteoprobe device to measure cortical bone reference point indentation properties.
Reference Point Indentation
The "Osteoprobe": Since these first reports of indentation measurements in humans in vivo, a more 'user-friendly' device, the Osteoprobe® has been developed by Active Life Scientific (Santa Barbara, CA) (10). The Osteoprobe®, which we will use in the current study, is smaller than the previous reference point indentation (RPI) instrument and is designed to be used in a hand-held fashion to allow for rapid measurements. The new instrument does not require a reference probe, because the inertia of the instrument keeps it adequately fixed in space during the short time of the indentation impact (\~0.25 milliseconds). The main parameter measured is the distance that the probe further indents into the bone from the reference point. Key components of the Osteoprobe® include an impact generation mechanism, a displacement transducer, and a probe made of hardened stainless steel with a 90 degree conical tip, with a tip diameter of \~375 µm.
Males over 50 years
We will recruit males to this second study arm, to use the handheld Osteoprobe device to measure cortical bone reference point indentation properties.
Reference Point Indentation
The "Osteoprobe": Since these first reports of indentation measurements in humans in vivo, a more 'user-friendly' device, the Osteoprobe® has been developed by Active Life Scientific (Santa Barbara, CA) (10). The Osteoprobe®, which we will use in the current study, is smaller than the previous reference point indentation (RPI) instrument and is designed to be used in a hand-held fashion to allow for rapid measurements. The new instrument does not require a reference probe, because the inertia of the instrument keeps it adequately fixed in space during the short time of the indentation impact (\~0.25 milliseconds). The main parameter measured is the distance that the probe further indents into the bone from the reference point. Key components of the Osteoprobe® include an impact generation mechanism, a displacement transducer, and a probe made of hardened stainless steel with a 90 degree conical tip, with a tip diameter of \~375 µm.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Reference Point Indentation
The "Osteoprobe": Since these first reports of indentation measurements in humans in vivo, a more 'user-friendly' device, the Osteoprobe® has been developed by Active Life Scientific (Santa Barbara, CA) (10). The Osteoprobe®, which we will use in the current study, is smaller than the previous reference point indentation (RPI) instrument and is designed to be used in a hand-held fashion to allow for rapid measurements. The new instrument does not require a reference probe, because the inertia of the instrument keeps it adequately fixed in space during the short time of the indentation impact (\~0.25 milliseconds). The main parameter measured is the distance that the probe further indents into the bone from the reference point. Key components of the Osteoprobe® include an impact generation mechanism, a displacement transducer, and a probe made of hardened stainless steel with a 90 degree conical tip, with a tip diameter of \~375 µm.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Non-fracture controls
Exclusion Criteria
* History of skeletal metastasis, primary hyperparathyroidism, Paget's disease, multiple myeloma
* Treatment with bisphosphonate, estrogen (within previous 3 years), teriparatide therapy, calcitonin, selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERMs,within previous 3 years)
* Use of glucocorticoids continuously for more than 3 months, use of anticonvulsants
* Prior fracture in adulthood (\>age 18) for healthy controls
Amendment to protocol added Arm 2, to include males \>50 years with otherwise similar eligibility criteria.
50 Years
100 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tamara Rozental
Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tamara Rozental, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014P000226
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.