Trochanteric Hip Fractures (AO A2) SHS With or Without Trochanteric Stabilizing Plate - Rct Using RSA

NCT ID: NCT02294747

Last Updated: 2020-09-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Trochanteric fractures represent about half of the hip fractures (with femoral neck fractures as the other half). Trochanteric hip fractures are almost always treated surgically with internal fixation of the fracture. However there is a debate ongoing for what is the appropriate implant to use. For stable fracture patterns the evidence seems to be in favor of the sliding hip screw, but for the unstable fractures it is more unclear whether to use a intramedullary nail or sliding hip screw with or without a lateral support plate (TSP). The role of the TSP in clinical use remains unclear and very little has been published about this, but it is believed to be an important contributor of stability to the sliding hip screw construct. We are planning a randomized controlled trial on trochanteric hip fractures to establish a method for implanting the tantalum markers, to observe the fracture healing process and to further investigate the role of the TSP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Trochanteric fractures represent about half of the hip fractures (with femoral neck fractures as the other half), and are almost always treated surgically with internal fixation of the fracture. However, there is an ongoing debate on what is the appropriate implant to use. For stable fracture patterns the evidence seems to be in favour of the sliding hip screw, whereas for the unstable fractures it is unclear whether an intramedullary nail or a sliding hip screw with or without a lateral support plate should be the implant of choice. A series of studies is now planned at Oslo University Hospital in collaboration with Diakonhjemmet Hospital in hope to further clarify this debate. The use of the lateral/trochanteric support plate (TSP) is widespread in some regions (e.g. Norway, Sweden and parts of Britain), but virtually never used other places. The role of the TSP remains unclear and very little has been published on it's use, even though it is believed to be an important contributor of stability to the sliding hip screw construct.

Trochanteric fractures are mainly caused by a direct trauma, i.e mainly a fall from own height in the elderly. The fractures are most often classified using the Müller AO classification or the Evans/Jensen, but several other classification systems also exist. The ideal classification system should be easily applicable, reliable, and aid in treatment decision making.

The treatment of trochanteric fractures comprise perioperative and operative modalities. The perioperative modalities consist among others of medical optimalization preoperatively, early rehabilitation and prevention of new fractures by treating osteoporosis and preventing new falls. The main scope of the current study will, however, be the operative modalities.

Surgery for trochanteric fractures is performed mainly with fracture reduction on a traction table and internal fixation, using either an intramedullary (IM) nail or a sliding hip screw (SHS), both available in various designs from different manufacturers. The latest Cochrane review did not conclude on which implant is the superior. However, among stable fractures there are less reoperations with the SHS, mainly due to peri-implant femoral fractures after operation with an IM nail that. The more unstable fractures, namely the reverse oblique and subtrochanteric fractures, may obtain better results using an intramedullary nail, probably due to less secondary dislocations with resulting varus deformity, shaft-medialization and shortening. The evidence for this is, however, weak and the role of the TSP remains unclear.

Radiostereometry (RSA) is the most precise and accurate method to measure motion in vivo between different segments in orthopaedic research. To do so, radio-opaque tantalum markers are implanted into the bone defining different segments. Stereoradiographs are performed over time to detect movement and monitor the healing (or non healing) process. This movement can be calculated both as translations and rotations. They are ideal to describe and compare the stability of fracture systems. RSA has been used successfully in earlier studies on fracture healing. Due to the high accuracy and precision, RSA yield reliable results with relatively small study-groups. We plan to use RSA to measure fracture dislocation and time to healing in our studies.

The study will be on the function of the trochanteric support plate and it´s ability to prevent secondary dislocation in AO 31 A2 fractures. We will utilize RSA for measurements during follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures Trochanteric Fractures Intertrochanteric Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SHS without TSP

Patients with AO 31 A2 trochanteric fractures operated with sliding hip screw without trochanteric stabilization plate.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sliding Hip Screw without Trochanteric Stabilization Plate

Intervention Type DEVICE

SHS with TSP

Patients with AO 31 A2 trochanteric fractures operated with sliding hip screw with trochanteric stabilization plate.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sliding Hip Screw with Trochanteric Stabilization Plate

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sliding Hip Screw with Trochanteric Stabilization Plate

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sliding Hip Screw without Trochanteric Stabilization Plate

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lateral Stabilizing Plate, Lateral Support Shield

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* AO 31-A2
* able to walk independently, aids such as crutches or walker allowed
* able to consent
* fit for surgery with SHS with or without TSP

Exclusion Criteria

* not willing or able to attain follow up
* previous fracture or surgery with retained metal work in the same hip
* concomitant disease that will shorten life expectancy
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Diakonhjemmet Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Frede Frihagen

Consultant, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frede Frihagen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oslo University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Orthopedic Center, Ulleval University Hospital

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Diakonhjemmet Hospital

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014/475/REK SO B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The FDR (Femoral Derotaton) Trail.
NCT04086368 RECRUITING NA
Non Randomized Humerusshaft Fracture
NCT00205972 COMPLETED PHASE4
THP Hip Fracture Plating System Study
NCT03870477 TERMINATED NA