Intramedullary Nail Versus Hip Arthroplasty in Unstable Trochanteric Hip Fractures

NCT ID: NCT04868305

Last Updated: 2024-03-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

170 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-12

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A hip fracture is a large burden to the patient with increased mortality, pain and increased need for daily assistance. Trochanteric fractures of the femur (FTF) represents about 35% of the hip fractures. Today FTFs are mainly treated with internal fixation using sliding hips screws (SHS) or intramedullary nail (IMN), whilst hip arthroplasty (THA/HA) is rarely used. Despite advances in the design of the internal fixation implants there is a high failure rate, in particular in cases of FTFs classified as unstable fractures. Since the introduction of hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fractures there has been a reduction in complication rates, early mobilization and shorter hospital stays.

The primary objective of this project is to investigate if treatment with hip arthroplasty in unstable FTFs will increase the postoperative mobility, give a better general health outcome for the patient, better quality of life and reduce re-operation rate for the patients compared to those operated with the traditional IMN.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Proximal femoral fractures also termed "hip" fractures are one of the most common fractures among adults over 50 years of age. With increase in life expectancy, the incidence of these fractures is also increasing. By 2040, the number of these fractures are expected to double in Norway. Trochanteric fractures of the femur (Fractura Trochanterica Femoris, FTF) represents about 35% of the hip fractures in Norway . There are many classification systems for FTFs, but The Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) have adopted the system developed by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osteosynthese (AO ) group, and is the most commonly used in addition to the Evans Jensens classification.

The mean age of hip fracture patients is 82 years for women and 78 for men. The comorbidity in this patient group is high with large amount of dementia, sarcopenia and osteoporosis. The one-year mortality rate after a hip fractures is 20-35%. According to the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register 15 % of the hip fractures are unstable trochanteric fractures (AO 31A2.2-A3). The prognosis is poor, in particular for unstable (multi fragmented) fractures, with reported complications up to 35-51 %.

Substantial research has established better understanding and best practice guidelines to treat the femoral neck fractures, mostly with hip arthroplasty, however no superior method is established for the unstable trochanteric fractures. 'Getting It Right First Time' is important for these fragile patients, thus post-operative complications are associated with a large increase in the mortality.

Today, most of the FTFs are reduced and fixated with a sliding hip screw (SHS), although the use of intramedullary nails (IMN) is increasing. RCTs have shown better survival of IMN compared to SHS for the more distal FTFs and subtrochanteric fracture. Unstable FTFs (AO 31A2 - A3, EVJ III-V) have high reoperation rates (21-35%) when operated either with SHS or IMN. Unacceptable shortening, external rotation deformity of the limb and long time to recover/mobilization have been the problems with osteosynthesis.

The question is if hip arthroplasty can give a superior treatment outcome for patients suffering from unstable subtypes of trochanteric hip fractures compared to the traditional treatment with IMN. A randomized clinical trial is to be conducted comparing these two treatment methodologies.

Stavanger University Hospital (SUH) receives over 150 FTFs per year. About 1/3 of the FTFs are of unstable fracture morphology. The planned study is a randomized clinical trial. The randomization module will be provided by Klinisk forskningsenhet Midt-Norge (KlinForsk). Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomized to one of two treatment groups, IMN versus hip arthroplasty.

Included patients will be treated in accordance to a local operation protocol:

Intramedullary nails will be operated by a resident orthopedic surgeon with at least 2 years' experience in fracture surgery or a consultant orthopedic surgeon (there must always be a consultant orthopedic surgeon present in the surgical team). A long IMN must always be utilized. Anatomical reposition or positive anterior and medial cortical support should be strived to be achieved. If a large antero- or posteromedial fragment is present one should consider an additional cerclage to fix the fragment.

Arthroplasty will be operated by a resident orthopedic surgeon with at least 2 years' experience with hip arthroplasty surgery or by a consultant orthopedic surgeon subspecialized in arthroplasty surgery, with competency within revision or difficult primary hip arthroplasty surgery (there must always be a consultant orthopedic surgeon subspecialized in arthroplasty surgery present in the surgical team). Posterior surgical approach will be used. If a cup is to be utilized it must be a cemented dual-mobility cup.

The patients will have follow-up appointments at 2-, 6 and 12 months postoperative. Following data will be collected:

* Patient reported outcome measures (HOOS and EQ5D)
* Timed up and go test
* Trendelenburg test
* Clinical leg length discrepancy
* Radiological assessment from hip x-rays (AP and lateral)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Injuries and Disorders Hip Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients with an identified unstable trochanteric hip fracture (AO 31A2.2-3.3) who has fulfilled inclusion criteria and given their consent will be randomized into one of two treatments; Intramedullary nail versus hip arthroplasty
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intramedullary nail

Intramedullary nail with proximal lagscrew and distal locking screw(s)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intramedullary nail

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intertan nail (Smith \& Nephew)\* or Gamma 3 nail (Stryker)\*

\* All of the above-mentioned products are subjects to change into an equivalent product

Hip arthroplasty

Hemiarthroplasty (HA) or Total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cemented dual-mobility cup will be utilized in THA. Addition of cerclage/trochanter claw plate to fixate trochanter major will be used when suitable.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hip arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total hip arthroplasty:

* Cemented: Lubinus (Link)\*, Exeter (Stryker)\*
* Uncemented: Restoration Modular (Stryker)\*
* Cup: Cemented Avantage dual mobility cup (Zimmer Biomet)\*

Hemiarthroplasty:

* Cemented: Lubinus (Link)\*, Exeter (Stryker)\*
* Uncemented: Restoration Modular (Stryker)\*

* All of the above-mentioned products are subjects to change into an equivalent product

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intramedullary nail

Intertan nail (Smith \& Nephew)\* or Gamma 3 nail (Stryker)\*

\* All of the above-mentioned products are subjects to change into an equivalent product

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty:

* Cemented: Lubinus (Link)\*, Exeter (Stryker)\*
* Uncemented: Restoration Modular (Stryker)\*
* Cup: Cemented Avantage dual mobility cup (Zimmer Biomet)\*

Hemiarthroplasty:

* Cemented: Lubinus (Link)\*, Exeter (Stryker)\*
* Uncemented: Restoration Modular (Stryker)\*

* All of the above-mentioned products are subjects to change into an equivalent product

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 65 years
* American Society of Anesthesiology Score (ASA) \< 4
* Ambulant with or without aid (preinjury)
* Radiological verified unstable trochanteric hip fracture (AO 31A2.2 - 3.3)
* Written consent obtained by patient or his/her next of kin

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous hip surgery on ipsilateral or contralateral side
* Non-ambulant preinjury
* Patient not living in the area of hospital care
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

120 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helse Stavanger HF

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ane Djuv, MD., PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Helse Stavanger HF

Jan-Erik Gjertsen, MD., PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Haukeland University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stavanger University Hospital

Stavanger, , Norway

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Thomas Abel Woldeyesus, MD

Role: CONTACT

+4751513488

Ane Djuv, MD., PhD

Role: CONTACT

+4751518284

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Thomas Woldeyesus, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

140120V1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.