Identification of Microcirculation and Inflammation After Posterior Stabilization of the Spine
NCT ID: NCT01266200
Last Updated: 2012-11-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-12-31
2012-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study is planned as a randomized prospective study. In the study a total of at least 100 patients should be included, 50 with minimally invasive fixation-implantation and 50 patients with conventional procedure.
The radiological imaging (post-surgical control, possibly after mobilization, CT) ist routinely.
The patient outcome is determined using established scores (clinical score, visual analogue scale, SF-12).
The study also indicates by comparing the damage of the microcirculation of the two surgical techniques to make statements on wound healing and muscle blood flow heavily in order to filter out the less complications and tissue-method.
In this research project, the limits in the microcirculation measurement with the O2C and contrast enhanced sonography be established at an early stage to help in future wound healing disorders can be treated so well.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Minimal-invasive treatment (Mantis)
Patients, who received a minimal-invasive surgery and the fracture was fixed by a system called Mantis
Mantis
percutaneous minimal-invasive technique at the thoracal-lumbal junction with for cuts of about 3 cms
XIA
Treatment of the fracture with Xia and conventional operation technique
Conventional technique (XIA)
Patients who received a surgical treatment including one long cut (conventional operation technique) and the fracture was fixed by a conventional system called XIA
XIA
Treatment of the fracture with Xia and conventional operation technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mantis
percutaneous minimal-invasive technique at the thoracal-lumbal junction with for cuts of about 3 cms
XIA
Treatment of the fracture with Xia and conventional operation technique
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
RWTH Aachen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthias Knobe, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dpt. of Orthopedic Trauma, RWTH Aachen University
Hans-Christoph Pape, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Dpt. of Orthopedic Trauma, RWTH Aachen University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
RWTH Aachen University Hospital
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CTC-A10-027
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id