Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Arthroscopic "Inlay"Bristow Surgery With Screw Fixation vs Suture-button Fixation

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

117 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-01

Study Completion Date

2020-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Retrospective comparative case-cohort study to investigate the efficacy of the modified arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet surgery and to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes using screw fixation vs suture-button fixation.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

A Prospective Comparative Study of Arthroscopic and Open Surgery in Cuistow Procedure

NCT04952636

Shoulder Dislocation

UNKNOWN NA

Absorption Rate and Bone Ingrowth of Absorbable Anchors Used in Shoulder Dislocation

NCT04977505

Shoulder Dislocation

COMPLETED

Treatment Of Supracondylar Fractures Closed Reduction And Circular Ring External Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

NCT02196311

Supracondylar Humerus Fractures

WITHDRAWN

Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape, MBR, and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study

NCT05698446

Ankle Sprains Hypermobility Syndrome

RECRUITING

Operative Plate Fixation Versus Conservative Treatment for Acute, Displaced Fractures of Humeral Shaft

NCT03358173

Humeral Fractures

UNKNOWN

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background：Some studies have advocated the use of suture-button fixation during Bristow-latarjet surgery to reduce complications associated with screw fixation. However, these studies are not comparative studies, and their data are relatively incomplete.

Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes using screw fixation vs suture-button fixation.

Study Design: Retrospective comparative case-cohort study Methods: Patients who underwent the modified arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet surgery between June 2015 and February 2018 were selected. Shoulders were separated into two groups based on surgical fixation method. Radiological results on 3D CT scan and clinical results were assessed preoperatively, immediately after operation, and postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and during the final follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shoulder; Dislocation, Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

screw group

coracoid bone block fixed by the screw

Bristow surgery fixed by the screw

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bristow surgery fixed by the screw

button group

coracoid bone block fixed by the suture-button

Bristow surgery fixed by the suture button

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bristow surgery fixed by the suture button

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bristow surgery fixed by the screw

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bristow surgery fixed by the suture button

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. a glenoid defect ≥10%
2. contact sport athletes with a glenoid defect \< 10%
3. failure after Bankart repair.

Exclusion Criteria

1. epilepsy
2. multidirectional shoulder instability
3. concomitant other lesions including rotator cuff tear, symptomatic acromioclavicular joint pathology or pathological involvement of the long head of the biceps
4. Follow-up was less than 2 years or incomplete follow-up data.

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No