Does Surgical-approach Affect Outcome After Fixation of Intra-articular Fractures of Distal Humerus?

NCT ID: NCT03833414

Last Updated: 2019-02-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

observational study at tertiary care hospital and level 1 trauma centre aiming to evaluate the difference between two common surgical approaches to distal humerus fracture fixation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fractures around the distal humerus fractures make up to 2% of all fractures. Complex intra-articular distal humerus fractures present as challenge to restore of painless, stable and mobile elbow joint. Surgical exposure to all critical structures is of paramount importance to achieve anatomic reduction. Conflict still persists regarding the choice of ideal approach between triceps-sparing approach compared with olecranon osteotomy approach. In this study investigators compare the effect of surgical approach triceps lifting vs olecranon osteotomy on the functional outcome after fixation of distal humerus intra-articular fractures. Investigators conducted a non-funded, non-commercial, retrospective cohort study on participants with closed distal humerus intra-articular fractures between 2010 and 2015 at our tertiary care level-1 trauma and university hospital. Participants \>18 years of age with closed complex intra-articular distal humerus fracture were operated using two different surgical approaches, either triceps lifting approach (Group1) or with olecranon osteotomy (Group 2). Functional evaluation of the participant is carried out with quick DASH scores at the final 1 year follow-up. Investigators concluded that triceps lifting approach can be used equally efficiently for exposure of these complex distal humerus injuries with no comprise in visibility of articular fragments.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Distal Humerus Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

(Group1)

Triceps lifting approach .

triceps lifting and olecranon osteotomy approaches

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

two different surgical approaches for distal humerus fracture

(Group 2)

olecranon osteotomy approach

triceps lifting and olecranon osteotomy approaches

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

two different surgical approaches for distal humerus fracture

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

triceps lifting and olecranon osteotomy approaches

two different surgical approaches for distal humerus fracture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients \>18 years of age with closed complex intra-articular distal humerus fracture (Intercondylar Fracture Riseborough Radin Classification type lll and lV) were included.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with CVA (Cerebero-Vascular Accident), dementia and associated with neurovascular injuries which may impede with rehabilitation are excluded
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aga Khan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aziz Hayder

admin assistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3799-Sur-ERC-15

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study on Outcomes of Proximal Humerus Fractures
NCT07060664 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA