Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Push-Off Test
NCT ID: NCT07341594
Last Updated: 2026-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
109 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-01-16
2026-06-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Do Imagined Movements Improve Dexterity in Distal Radius Fractures?
NCT03310151
Angle Specific Torque Profiles After Distal Radius Fracture
NCT07008430
Defining Displacement Thresholds for Surgical Intervention for Distal Radius Fractures - a Delphi Study
NCT03126474
Patients With Distal Radius Fracture
NCT04071002
Does Surgical-approach Affect Outcome After Fixation of Intra-articular Fractures of Distal Humerus?
NCT03833414
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Another important metric is the minimal detectable change (MDC). The MDC represents the smallest amount of change that exceeds the measurement error of an instrument. Therefore, any change smaller than the MDC may be the result of measurement variability. To ensure that the MDC is sufficiently small to detect the MCID, the MCID should be greater than the MDC. The MDC of the POT has been investigated in patients with wrist or elbow pathologies; however, to date, the MCID has not been established in patients with distal radius fractures.
In summary, the POT is a test that objectively evaluates axial loading of the upper extremity in the presence of hand or wrist pathology. However, to ensure the reliability of preliminary findings and to support its integration into hand therapy practice, further studies are needed to evaluate its measurement properties using specific patient samples.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
All patients
All patients diagnosed with distal radius fractures who were treated conservatively or surgically
Physical therapy
For all patients treated conservatively or surgically, active range of motion exercises for the hand, wrist, and forearm will be initiated after cast removal or on the first postoperative day, respectively. To control edema, bandaging, contrast baths, and retrograde massage will be recommended. In the subsequent weeks of rehabilitation, resisted exercises for the hand, wrist, and forearm will be introduced. All patients will be followed with a home exercise program and will be scheduled for follow-up visits once a week.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physical therapy
For all patients treated conservatively or surgically, active range of motion exercises for the hand, wrist, and forearm will be initiated after cast removal or on the first postoperative day, respectively. To control edema, bandaging, contrast baths, and retrograde massage will be recommended. In the subsequent weeks of rehabilitation, resisted exercises for the hand, wrist, and forearm will be introduced. All patients will be followed with a home exercise program and will be scheduled for follow-up visits once a week.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Voluntary participation
* Age between 18 and 65 years
* Having a cognitive level sufficient to understand the assessment methods and follow instructions
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of a neurological, orthopedic, rheumatologic, or metabolic condition that could affect the affected extremity
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pamukkale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
HANDE USTA
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pamukkale University
Denizli, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, Michlovitz SL, Rafuse R, Wells-Rowsell C, Wong O, Bisbee L. The push-off test: development of a simple, reliable test of upper extremity weight-bearing capability. J Hand Ther. 2014 Jul-Sep;27(3):185-90; quiz 191. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
Mehta SP, George HR, Goering CA, Shafer DR, Koester A, Novotny S. Reliability, validity, and minimal detectable change of the push-off test scores in assessing upper extremity weight-bearing ability. J Hand Ther. 2019 Jan-Mar;32(1):103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.09.008.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E-60116787-020-804778
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.