Defining Displacement Thresholds for Surgical Intervention for Distal Radius Fractures - a Delphi Study
NCT ID: NCT03126474
Last Updated: 2020-01-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
43 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-02-17
2017-06-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This will provide guidance and reduce variation between treating surgeons.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Do Imagined Movements Improve Dexterity in Distal Radius Fractures?
NCT03310151
Does Surgical-approach Affect Outcome After Fixation of Intra-articular Fractures of Distal Humerus?
NCT03833414
Analysis of Implant Placement in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures in Western Brittany (REDIRA)
NCT06011122
Functional Outcome Following Fracture of the Distal Radius
NCT01435070
Patients With Distal Radius Fracture
NCT04071002
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Delphi process involves seeking consensus from renowned experts to provide an answer to specific research questions. Through this Delphi study the investigators intend to investigate and achieve consensus regarding the threshold for intervention in displaced distal radius fractures. The aim is to quantify how much displacement can be accepted before intervention is required for different patient groups. This can then help guide surgeons with their management decisions and help reduce variation.
A three round modified Delphi process will be used. Identified experts will be sent an invitation email with an attached electronic form which they will be asked to fill in and return to indicate if they wish to take part.
Invitation emails will be sent on the same day to all experts and they will be given 14 days to return the acceptance form.
The first round will start 14 days after the invitation email is sent. The first round electronic survey link will simultaneously be emailed to all participants who have agreed to take part. After seven days, a second e-mail (reminder) will be sent to the participants who do not respond to the first invitation. On the 15th day, responses for the first round will be collected. The investigators will analyse the collected responses and the level of agreement in the responses will be assessed.
The second round will be conducted 14 days after the first round is finalised and analysed. Only the responders who take part in the first round will be invited. The participants will be given the information about the results of the first round ,the methodology used and a review of the literature. Reminder e-mails will be sent on the 7th day, concluding the second round at 15th day. The second round results will be evaluated using the same method as that for the first round. The format of the third round (if required due to persistent disagreement) will be similar to that of the second round. Consensus is defined as 70% agreement between participants
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Delphi panel
Group of expert surgeons who have experience dealing with distal radius fractures No intervention will be performed on a patient. Participants will discuss and aim to obtain agreement about best treatment options for a variety of cases
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Leicester
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nick A Johnson, MBCHB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Leicester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nick Johnson
Leicester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0593
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.