A Retrospective Study on the Outcome of Different Fixation Methods After Olecranon Osteotomy

NCT ID: NCT04376801

Last Updated: 2020-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-01

Study Completion Date

2021-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Humeral intercondylar fractures are very challenging in clinical treatment. There are many problems not clear. One of the important problems remained to be solved is which fixation method can achieve the best effects after olecranon osteotomy. Therefore, the investigators are going to perform a retrospective analysis of patients with distal humerus fractures admitted to their hospital in 2012-2017 to compare the functional outcomes of elbow joints with tension-band fixation and plate fixation after olecranon osteotomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Humeral intercondylar fractures are very challenging in clinical treatment. Because the humeral intercondylar fracture is comminuted and often occurs in elderly patients with osteoporosis, it is difficult to achieve rigid fixation during the operation and failure of fixation occurs from time to time after the operation. Nonunion and reoperation have brought great sufferings to the patients.In recent years, both surgical methods and technique of internal fixation have been greatly improved, but there are still many problems not clear. Olecranon osteotomy has been proven to be an effective approach for comminuted intercondylar fractures and there are different fixation methods to fix the proximal ulna after intercondylar fixation. However, it is not clear which method can achieve the best effects. Therefore, the investigators are going to perform a retrospective analysis of patients with distal humerus fractures admitted to their hospital in 2012-2017 to compare the functional outcomes of elbow joints with tension-band fixation and plate fixation after olecranon osteotomy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Distal Humerus Fractures Osteotomy Fixation Device; Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tension-band Fixation Group

Patients with distal humerus fractures admitted to our hospital in 2012-2017 who had been performed open reduction and internal fixation through olecranon osteotomy approach were selected. All patients were devided into two groups by different fixation method. Patients who had been performed tension-band fixation after olecranon osteotomy were classified into Tension-band Fixation Group.

No interventions assigned to this group

Plate Fixation Group

Patients with distal humerus fractures admitted to our hospital in 2012-2017 who had been performed open reduction and internal fixation through olecranon osteotomy approach were selected. All patients were devided into two groups by different fixation method. Patients who had been performed plate fixation after olecranon osteotomy were classified into Plate Fixation Group.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients over 18 years old;
2. Distal humerus fractures.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pathological fractures;
2. Combined with fractures of ipsilateral upper limb;
3. Fracture over 2 weeks;
4. Patients who refused surgical treatment;
5. Patients who were unable to obtain the 1 year follow-up data after the operation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beijing Jishuitan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chen chen

Resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Xieyuan Jiang

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beijing Jishuitan Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing Jishuitan Hospital

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201708-05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study on Outcomes of Proximal Humerus Fractures
NCT07060664 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Non Randomized Humerusshaft Fracture
NCT00205972 COMPLETED PHASE4