Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape, MBR, and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study

NCT ID: NCT05698446

Last Updated: 2025-04-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

114 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-01

Study Completion Date

2025-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI. BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma. In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Generalized joint laxity (GJL) is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an open modified Broström repair (MBR) for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). MBR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma. In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ankle Sprains Hypermobility Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Open Modified Broström +Suture tape augmentation group

Patients who accept a modified Broström +Suture tape augmentation operation

Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients with CLAI and GJL will accept the Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation

Anatomic reconstruction operation group

Patients who accept an anatomic reconstruction

Anatomic reconstruction operation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anatomic reconstruction operation

Open Modified Broström group

Patients who under went open Modified Broström-Gould surgery

Open Modified Broström procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open Modified Broström-Gould surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation

Patients with CLAI and GJL will accept the Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anatomic reconstruction operation

Anatomic reconstruction operation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open Modified Broström procedure

Open Modified Broström-Gould surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of lateral ankle pain and instability Beighton score ≥4 Age with 18 to 60 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with an acute or subacute ankle injury (within 3 months) Injury of the deltoid ligament Alignment of lower extremity greater than 5 degrees Fractures of the lower extremity Stage III or IV osteoarthritis Patients who refused to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking University Third Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jiang Dong

Chief physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dong Jiang, MD

Role: CONTACT

13811280948

Anhong Wang, MD

Role: CONTACT

18501325799

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dong Jiang, MD

Role: primary

13811280948

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Xu HX, Lee KB. Modified Brostrom Procedure for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability in Patients With Generalized Joint Laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3152-3157. doi: 10.1177/0363546516657816. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27496909 (View on PubMed)

Sacks HA, Prabhakar P, Wessel LE, Hettler J, Strickland SM, Potter HG, Fufa DT. Generalized Joint Laxity in Orthopaedic Patients: Clinical Manifestations, Radiographic Correlates, and Management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 20;101(6):558-566. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00458. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30893238 (View on PubMed)

Lan R, Piatt ET, Bolia IK, Haratian A, Hasan L, Peterson AB, Howard M, Korber S, Weber AE, Petrigliano FA, Tan EW. Suture Tape Augmentation in Lateral Ankle Ligament Surgery: Current Concepts Review. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021 Oct 20;6(4):24730114211045978. doi: 10.1177/24730114211045978. eCollection 2021 Oct.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35097476 (View on PubMed)

Michels F, Cordier G, Burssens A, Vereecke E, Guillo S. Endoscopic reconstruction of CFL and the ATFL with a gracilis graft: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1007-14. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3779-1. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26410096 (View on PubMed)

Cho BK, Park JK, Choi SM, SooHoo NF. A randomized comparison between lateral ligaments augmentation using suture-tape and modified Brostrom repair in young female patients with chronic ankle instability. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Apr;25(2):137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29409289 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

M2022514

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

MPFL Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation
NCT06926699 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA