Dead Space in Mechanical Ventilation With Constant Expiratory Flow

NCT ID: NCT06024993

Last Updated: 2025-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-22

Study Completion Date

2026-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Conventional continuous mandatory mechanical ventilation relies on the passive recoil of the chest wall for expiration. This results in an exponentially decreasing expiratory flow.

Flow controlled ventilation (FCV), a new ventilation mode with constant, continuous, controlled expiratory flow, has recently become clinically available and is increasingly being adopted for complex mechanical ventilation during surgery.

In both clinical and pre-clinical settings, an improvement in ventilation (CO2 clearance) has been observed during FCV compared to conventional ventilation. Recently, Schranc et al. compared flow-controlled ventilation with pressure-regulated volume control in both double lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation in pigs. They report differences in dead space ventilation that may explain the improved CO2 clearance, although their study was not designed to compare dead space ventilation within the group of double lung ventilation.

Dead space ventilation, or "wasted ventilation", is the ventilation of hypoperfused lung zones, and is clinically relevant, as it is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and is correlated with higher airway driving pressures which are thought to be injurious to the lung (lung stress).

This trial aims to study the difference in dead space ventilation between conventional mechanical ventilation in volume-controlled mode and flow controlled-ventilation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mechanical Ventilation Artificial Respiration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Crossover volume-controlled ventilation and flow-controlled ventilation
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
During analysis the groups (flow-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation) will be blinded.

Participants know that they will be exposed to both modes of ventilation, but are unaware of the randomized sequence (FCV-VCV or VCV-FCV).

It is impossible to mask the investigators delivering the intervention.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FCV-VCV

After titration of ventilation in baseline VCV (all arms), participants will first receive 20 min of baseline-matched FCV and subsequently 20 min of baseline-matched VCV.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV)

Intervention Type DEVICE

20 minutes of FCV, delivered with the CE-marked Evone ventilator (Ventinova medical, the Netherlands)

Conventional volume-controlled ventilation (VCV)

Intervention Type DEVICE

20 minutes of conventional VCV, delivered with the CE-marked Aisys CS3 (GE Healthcare, USA) or Flow-i (Getinge, Sweden) ventilators.

VCV-FCV

After titration of ventilation in baseline VCV (all arms), participants will first receive 20 min of baseline-matched VCV and subsequently 20 min of baseline-matched FCV.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV)

Intervention Type DEVICE

20 minutes of FCV, delivered with the CE-marked Evone ventilator (Ventinova medical, the Netherlands)

Conventional volume-controlled ventilation (VCV)

Intervention Type DEVICE

20 minutes of conventional VCV, delivered with the CE-marked Aisys CS3 (GE Healthcare, USA) or Flow-i (Getinge, Sweden) ventilators.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV)

20 minutes of FCV, delivered with the CE-marked Evone ventilator (Ventinova medical, the Netherlands)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional volume-controlled ventilation (VCV)

20 minutes of conventional VCV, delivered with the CE-marked Aisys CS3 (GE Healthcare, USA) or Flow-i (Getinge, Sweden) ventilators.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults \[18-70\] yrs
* General anaesthesia for elective surgery
* Arterial line, central venous line and endotracheal tube as part of standard of care
* Expected duration of controlled mechanical ventilation ≥ 60 minutes
* Supine position (0±10°)

Exclusion Criteria

* One lung ventilation
* Known pregnancy
* Increased intra-abdominal pressure (pneumoperitoneum or obesity (BMI \> 30kg/m2))
* COPD GOLD IV or home oxygen dependence
* Cardiac pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or thoracic neurostimulator
* Skin lesions (e.g. injury, inflammation) at the level where the Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) band is to be applied
* Clinical signs of raised intracranial pressure
* Potential interference with the surgery due to the setup of the study instruments.
* Patient refusal to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universiteit Antwerpen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Antwerp

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vera Saldien, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Antwerp University Hospital / University of Antwerp

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Antwerp University Hospital (UZA)

Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Carine Smitz

Role: CONTACT

+32 3 821 49 30

Joke De Wachter

Role: CONTACT

+32 3 821 30 42

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Carine Smitz

Role: primary

+323 821 49 30

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

003029

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.