AMBU Bag Manual Ventilation vs. Transport Ventilator Mechanical Ventilation for Transport
NCT ID: NCT06006208
Last Updated: 2025-12-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-11-01
2025-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of A Novel Emergency Transport Ventilator in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
NCT07198269
Impact of Biphasic Cuirass Ventilation Compared to Non Invasive Ventilation in High Risk Extubations
NCT07067502
RCT of Mesh Versus Jet Nebulizers on Clinical Outcomes During Mechanical Ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT02056119
Mechanical Power-Guided Lung Protective Ventilation (VentCoach) in Acute Hypoxemic and/or Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
NCT07294768
Air-impingement Manipulation to Clear Subglottic Secretion to Prevent VAP in Prolonged Intubated Patients
NCT02632539
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: In this study, the investigators plan to compare the effects of transport ventilators (Hamilton C1: Bodaduz, Schweiz) and AMBU bag manual ventilation on oxygenation, ventilation, biventricular function, and hemodynamics. This is a two-arm study.
1. To assess pre and post transport PaO2/FiO2 (P/F ratio), PaCO2, biventricular function, and mean artery pressure in the AMBU bag and Hamilton transport ventilator groups. The investigators hypothesize that using the Hamilton transport ventilator will show a smaller change in P/F ratio, mean artery blood pressures and biventricular function compared to the AMBU bag group. If true, these findings would support using the Hamilton ventilator for transport in appropriate surgical patients.
2. To perform "in-vitro" flow analysis using a flow analyzer analyzer (CITREX H5:
Buchs, Schweiz) and lung simulator (SmartLung 2000: Buchs, Schweiz) to measure the accuracy of the ventilations of Hamilton C1 ventilator and AMBU bag manual ventilation on different resistance and compliance settings of the lung simulator
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Arm 1: AMBU bag manual ventilation during transport to the ICU Arm 2: Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1: AMBU bag manual ventilation during transport to the ICU
No interventions assigned to this group
Arm 2: Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU
Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU
Instead of AMBU bag manual ventilation during transport to the ICU, intervention is using Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU
Instead of AMBU bag manual ventilation during transport to the ICU, intervention is using Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cardiac surgery
* Require postoperative mechanical ventilation and care in the ICU.
Exclusion Criteria
* Extubation in OR
* On mechanical circulatory support
* Requirement for postoperative therapy with inhaled pulmonary vasodilators (epoprostenol (FLOLAN), inhaled nitric oxide, etc.)
* Severe RV dysfunction with preoperative echocardiography
* Contraindication to TEE and pulmonary artery catheter.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Thomas Jefferson University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yoshihisa Morita, MD
Associate professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
iRISID-2022-1315
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.