AMBU Bag Manual Ventilation vs. Transport Ventilator Mechanical Ventilation for Transport

NCT ID: NCT06006208

Last Updated: 2025-12-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-01

Study Completion Date

2025-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a clinical trial to compare the oxygenation and ventilation performance between manual ventilation and mechanical ventilation when transporting cardiac patients to the ICU.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Following cardiac surgery, patients often require ventilation during transport to the intensive care unit (ICU). Most of the time, manual ventilation using an AMBU bag (AMBU INC. MD, USA) is utilized, but some patients need mechanical ventilation due to concern for oxygenation, ventilation, and hemodynamics. The indication to choose mechanical ventilation over manual ventilation is determined on a case-by-case basis, mostly based on providers' experiences or surgical request, because currently there is no clear clinical evidence behind that. With this clinical study, the investigators intend to build up clinical evidence by comparing oxygenation, ventilation, hemodynamics, and cardiac functions between two arms: manual ventilation using AMBU bag arm and mechanical ventilation using a transport ventilator.

Objective: In this study, the investigators plan to compare the effects of transport ventilators (Hamilton C1: Bodaduz, Schweiz) and AMBU bag manual ventilation on oxygenation, ventilation, biventricular function, and hemodynamics. This is a two-arm study.

1. To assess pre and post transport PaO2/FiO2 (P/F ratio), PaCO2, biventricular function, and mean artery pressure in the AMBU bag and Hamilton transport ventilator groups. The investigators hypothesize that using the Hamilton transport ventilator will show a smaller change in P/F ratio, mean artery blood pressures and biventricular function compared to the AMBU bag group. If true, these findings would support using the Hamilton ventilator for transport in appropriate surgical patients.
2. To perform "in-vitro" flow analysis using a flow analyzer analyzer (CITREX H5:

Buchs, Schweiz) and lung simulator (SmartLung 2000: Buchs, Schweiz) to measure the accuracy of the ventilations of Hamilton C1 ventilator and AMBU bag manual ventilation on different resistance and compliance settings of the lung simulator

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Oxygenation Manual Ventilation Mechanical Ventilation Point of Care Ultrasound Cardiac Function Disturbance Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

After IRB approval and obtaining a written informed consent, patients will be randomly assigned to the one of the following 2 arms. However, AMBU bag arm patients may be switched to Hamilton C1 at an anesthesia provider's discretion based on post cardiopulmonary bypass right ventricular function, PaO2/FiO2, and PaCO2. These patients will be excluded from the AMBU bag arm.

Arm 1: AMBU bag manual ventilation during transport to the ICU Arm 2: Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The patients will be randomly assigned to 2 arms above and the patients are not informed about which arm they are assigned.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: AMBU bag manual ventilation during transport to the ICU

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Arm 2: Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU

Intervention Type DEVICE

Instead of AMBU bag manual ventilation during transport to the ICU, intervention is using Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU

Instead of AMBU bag manual ventilation during transport to the ICU, intervention is using Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Over 18 years old (any gender or race)
* Cardiac surgery
* Require postoperative mechanical ventilation and care in the ICU.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients' refusal
* Extubation in OR
* On mechanical circulatory support
* Requirement for postoperative therapy with inhaled pulmonary vasodilators (epoprostenol (FLOLAN), inhaled nitric oxide, etc.)
* Severe RV dysfunction with preoperative echocardiography
* Contraindication to TEE and pulmonary artery catheter.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Thomas Jefferson University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yoshihisa Morita, MD

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Thomas Jefferson University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

iRISID-2022-1315

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.