Use of a Putty as Gap Filler in Open-wedge Osteotomy

NCT ID: NCT05992038

Last Updated: 2023-09-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-20

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: Realignment osteotomies around the knee are a proven surgical treatment for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis and a malalignment. Osteotomies can be very painful in the early postoperative phase. This is probably due to a combination of bony cut (bone pain) and postoperative hematoma (bleeding and leakage of the bone marrow) in the surrounding soft tissue. The AttraX® Putty can be used as a gap filler in open wedge osteotomies to potentially reduce postoperative pain by reducing the bleeding from the bone gap.

Objective: The main aim of this study is to determine whether early postoperative pain is decreased when the osteotomy gap is filled with AttraX® Putty, compared to conventional open wedge osteotomy without filling the gap. The secondary aims are faster accelerated rehabilitation/regaining function, reduction of local blood loss, accelerated bone union, comparable surgical accuracy, and the occurrence of (serious) adverse events.

Study design: Single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Study population: Adult patients qualifying for open-wedge tibial, open-wedge femur or double level osteotomy.

Intervention: According to a randomization scheme, the osteotomy gap will be filled with either the synthetic ceramic material AttraX® Putty or without a gap filler (conventional method).

Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study endpoint is the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain during the first week postoperative. The secondary study endpoints are faster rehabilitation/regaining function, reduction of local blood loss, accelerated bone union, comparable surgical accuracy, and (serious) adverse events.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients may have the advantage of experiencing less pain postoperatively if they are treated with the AttraX® Putty, which can contribute to a faster rehabilitation. Risks to the AttraX® Putty group may include an allergic reaction, failure to promote bone fusion and excessive bone growth. However, the preclinical studies and clinical studies show that the use of AttraX® Putty is safe for use in humans.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Realignment osteotomies around the knee are a proven surgical treatment for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis and a malalignment. Osteotomies can be very painful in the early postoperative phase. This is probably due to a combination of bony cut (bone pain) and postoperative hematoma (bleeding and leakage of the bone marrow) in the surrounding soft tissue. The AttraX® Putty can be used as a gap filler in open wedge osteotomies to potentially reduce postoperative pain by reducing the bleeding from the bone gap.

AttraX® Putty: AttraX® putty is a synthetic ceramic which consists of calcium phosphate granules and hydroxyapatite (ß-tricalcium phosphate (\>90%)/hydroxyapatite(\<10%)). It is Conformité Européenne (CE) marked as bone void filler and bone haemostasis implant. Unlike most other synthetic bone grafts which are only osteoconductive, AttraX Putty is both osteoconductive and osteoinductive. Moreover, AttraX® Putty could overcome the disadvantages of using autologous bone grafts and allografts, such as, donor site morbidity, increased surgical time, and disease transmission. Animal studies and a clinical study showed no difference in bone fusion between AttraX® Putty and autograft after instrumented thoracolumbar fusion.

Objectives: The main aim of this study is to determine whether early postoperative pain is decreased when the osteotomy gap is filled with AttraX® Putty, compared to conventional open wedge osteotomy without filling the gap. The secondary aims are faster accelerated rehabilitation/regaining function, reduction of local blood loss, accelerated bone union, comparable surgical accuracy, and the occurrence of (serious) adverse events.

Study design: Single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Study population: Adult patients qualifying for open-wedge tibial, open-wedge femur or double level osteotomy. A total of 40 patients will be included, 20 patients in the control group (without gap filler) and 20 patients in the AttraX Putty group (with AttraX® Putty as gap filler). Osteotomy in combinations with cartilage treatment and corrections above 10 mm will be excluded.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study endpoint is the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain during the first week postoperative. The secondary study endpoints are the NRS pain during the second week, at 1 months, and at 3 months. Moreover, faster rehabilitation/regaining function, reduction of local blood loss, accelerated bone union, comparable surgical accuracy, and (serious) adverse events are secondary endpoints.

Study procedures: According to standard care, standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs will be taken postoperatively during hospitalization. The subsequent follow-up moments will take place at the outpatient clinic. The follow-up moments take place at +1 month, +4 months, +6 months, and +1 year postoperatively at the outpatient clinic. The follow-up moment of +6 months is extra for this study. During this extra follow-up moment, a CT scan of the lower limb (+6 months postoperative) will be performed to be able to draw a conclusion about the bone union.

According to standard care, radiographs are performed at +1 day, +1 month, +4 months, and +1 year. An extra radiograph will be performed at +6 months. Using these radiographs, a conclusion can be drawn about the union rate and osteotomy accuracy.

Moreover, the preoperative and postoperative (+1 day) haemoglobin value will be analysed, according to standard care. Using the haemoglobin value one of the secondary outcomes can be determined (difference in haemoglobin value between preoperative and postoperative).

The rest of the data will be collected at -1 week, +1 day, +1 week, +2 weeks, +3 weeks, +1 months, + 3 months, +4 months, +6 months, and +1 year postoperatively. This will involve questionnaires (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), EuroQol Five Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) and Kujala Patellofemoral Score), the NRS pain score, and measuring the calf or upper leg circumference. The calf or upper leg circumference is measured at the site where the open wedge osteotomy was performed. For a double-level osteotomy, it depends on where the open wedge osteotomy has taken place: the femur or the tibia. The location where the calf or upper leg circumference is to be measured will be marked with a marker. The patient will be given a tape measure to take home to measure the circumference in the morning. Using these data, the primary outcome and secondary outcomes can be answered.

If there is an indication for removal of the plate osteosynthesis (for example complaints of the plate after one year postoperative), the plate will be surgically removed, and a fine needle biopsy will be taken to analyse the newly formed bone. When indicated, the removal of the plate osteosynthesis will take place in the period from 12 months to 18 months postoperative.

Benefits and risks: Patients have the advantage of being checked more closely during follow-up. In addition, patients may have the advantage of experiencing less pain postoperatively if they are into the AttraX Putty group, which can contribute to an accelerated rehabilitation. Risks to the AttraX Putty group may include an allergic reaction, failure to promote bone fusion and excessive bone growth. However, the preclinical studies and clinical studies show that the use of AttraX® Putty is safe. Moreover, an extra CT scan and radiography are performed during this study. You will receive approximately 0.1 millisievert (mSv) of additional radiation because of this CT scan. By way of comparison: the 'ordinary' radiation that everyone in the Netherlands receives anyway is about \~2.9 mSv per year.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteo Arthritis Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Putty

The osteotomy gap will be filled with a synthetic ceramic material, Putty

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Osteotomy with putty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Synthetic ceramic putty

Conventional

Osteotomy performed according to the conventional method, without gap filler

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Conventional osteotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

conventional osteotomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Osteotomy with putty

Synthetic ceramic putty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional osteotomy

conventional osteotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* indication for an open-wedge osteotomy of the femur, tibia or double level due to unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA).
* Comply with all aspects of the treatment, including CT scans, radiographs and 1-year follow-up
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Osteotomy for indication of cartilage treatment or other knee surgeries than unicompartmental OA
* Correction using an open wedge above 10 mm
* Pregnant women at time of enrollment or women who are planning to become pregnant during the duration of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

R.J.H. Custers

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

R.J.H. Custers, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UMC Utrecht

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University medical center Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

R.J.H. Custers, Dr

Role: CONTACT

088 7558327 ext. +31

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Roel Custers, M.D., PhD

Role: primary

0887558327 ext. +31

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00167-019-05765-z

Structural allograft impaction enables fast rehabilitation in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a consecutive case series with one year follow-up

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32459724/

Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32080013/

Efficacy of a Standalone Microporous Ceramic Versus Autograft in Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion: A Multicenter, Randomized, Intrapatient Controlled, Noninferiority Trial

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

84534

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The ATtune Knee Outcome Study
NCT04247672 RECRUITING
HTO With and Without Arthroscopy
NCT00284622 UNKNOWN PHASE2
A Comparative Study of Knee Systems
NCT01331278 COMPLETED PHASE4
Efficacy and Safety of NAVIO
NCT04230616 RECRUITING NA
Weightbearing After High Tibial Osteotomy
NCT00426907 COMPLETED PHASE4