Trial Comparing Alignment Techniques - RSA of ATTUNE Knee System
NCT ID: NCT04079751
Last Updated: 2025-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-05
2022-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ALknee Follow-up Study of the Cementless ATTUNE Rotating Platform and the Cementless LCS Rotating Platform Knee System
NCT05623215
DePuy Attune Total Knee Arthroplasty RSA Study
NCT02103504
Total Knee Replacement With the Attune vs. the Press Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma.
NCT03077958
The ATtune Knee Outcome Study
NCT04247672
Matched Pair Study - Kinematic Vs Mechanical Alignment
NCT03446391
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Neutral mechanical alignment;
2. Anatomical alignment.
The principal objective of this study is to compare migration patterns between mechanical and anatomic alignment surgical techniques for the Attune S+ CR-FB knee system using model-based RSA over the first 2 post-operative years.
Secondary objectives include; comparison of 2-year migration values against published thresholds for adequate short-term fixation, comparison of functional and health status of subjects following surgery, comparison of intra-operative soft-tissue releases, incidence of complications and adverse events, and to assess several health economic parameters relating to the surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neutral Mechanical Alignment
Total knee arthroplasty: Neutral Mechanical Alignment vs Anatomical Alignment
Neutral Mechanical Alignment
Hip-knee-ankle angle of 180° ± 3°.
Anatomical Alignment
Total knee arthroplasty: Neutral Mechanical Alignment vs Anatomical Alignment
Anatomical Alignment
Restoring a patient's pre-diseased limb alignment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neutral Mechanical Alignment
Hip-knee-ankle angle of 180° ± 3°.
Anatomical Alignment
Restoring a patient's pre-diseased limb alignment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Varus knee deformity of 0 to 10 degrees
3. Sufficient ligamentous function to warrant retention of the posterior cruciate ligament
4. Between the ages of 21 and 80 inclusive
5. Patients willing and able to comply with follow-up requirements and self-evaluations
6. Ability to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Medical condition precluding major surgery
3. Inflammatory arthropathy
4. Prior patellectomy
5. PCL deficiency
6. Major Coronal plane deformity
7. Valgus alignment
8. Bone defects requiring augments, cones and/or stemmed implants
9. Body Mass Index 45 or more
21 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Radiostereometric Analysis Network
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas Turgeon
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Concordia Joint Replacement Group
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Concordia Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B2018-139
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.