Weightbearing After High Tibial Osteotomy

NCT ID: NCT00426907

Last Updated: 2015-04-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this project we want investigate the clinical results after different rehabilitation regimens(Limited or unlimited weightbearing after surgery) in Open-wedge High Tibial Osteotomies.

The hypothesis is that unlimited weightbearing is beneficial for the healing and rehabilitation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the treatment of osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee, Open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a good choice of treatment for the young and active patient.

However it leaves an open gap which has to be filled with a bone substitute and requires stable fixation.

Different rehabilitation-regimens are described, many advocating a period of partial weight-bearing for a period after surgery.

Results from biomechanical studies suggest that immediate full weight-bearing is safe, enabling earlier mobilisation without compromising safe solid healing.

The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether there is any difference in clinical outcome, correction, stability and healing in open-wedge osteotomies (osteosynthesis with the Dynafix® system (EBI)) after 2 different rehabilitation regimens: Limited weight-bearing (20 kg) for 6 weeks, and unrestricted weight-bearing.

The investigation is performed as a randomised prospective clinical trial including 20 patients with a planned 2 years follow-up period.

Clinical outcome is evaluated with: Hospital of special surgery score, KOOS, SF 12 and Lysholm score.

Routine standing x-rays is performed. Stability of the osteotomy is assessed with Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) that provides the opportunity of exact 3-dimensional measuring of eventual loss of correction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Full postoperative weightbearing

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Unlimited postoperative weightbearing

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Unlimited postoperative weightbearing

2

Partial weightbearing 6 weeks postoperative

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Unlimited postoperative weightbearing

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Unlimited postoperative weightbearing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Unlimited postoperative weightbearing

Unlimited postoperative weightbearing

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent
* Osteoarthritis of medial compartment of the knee, Ahlbäck gr. 1-2
* Varus deformity

Exclusion Criteria

* Prednisolone treatment.
* NSAID treatment.
* BMI \> or = 35.
* Previous surgery in lateral knee compartment.
* Secondary Arthrosis following fracture(s) of the tibial condyle(s).
* Lack of informed consent.
* Correction \>12,5 mm
* Peroperative displaced fracture of lateral bony hinge.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Lind-Hansen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Orthopaedic Division, Northern Denmark Region

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northern Orthopaedic Division, Klinik Farsoe and Aarhus University Hospital

Farsø, Northern Jutland, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ON-04-016-TLH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.