A Study of Patients Undergoing Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty at a Regional Hospital in Denmark
NCT ID: NCT03008967
Last Updated: 2018-02-05
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Total Enrollment
110 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2016-09-30
Study Completion Date
2018-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This project will be a descriptive, hypothesis-generating study. The aim is to identify risk factors for poor response to rehabilitation programs after TJR and use these to identify patients who are most susceptible to poor outcomes in order to optimise appropriate rehabilitations strategies and rationalising the distribution of health care resources.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rehabilitation After Fast-track Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01329081
Knee Arthroplasty
WITHDRAWN
NA
Out Patient Surgery for Total Knee and Hip Replacement and Unicompartmental Knee Replacement - a Feasibility Study
NCT02544620
Osteoarthritis
COMPLETED
Does Rehabilitation After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Work
NCT03750448
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Telerehabilitation
+1 more
COMPLETED
NA
Preoperative Exercise in Patients Undergoing Total Hip or Knee Replacement
NCT01003756
Osteoarthritis
COMPLETED
NA
Length of Stay and Complications in High-risk Patients Receiving Fast-track Total Hip (THA) or Knee- Alloplasty (TKA)
NCT01515670
Arthroplasty Complications
Co-morbidity
Postoperative Morbidity
COMPLETED
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Fast-track surgery for total knee and hip arthroplasty has improved markedly in recent years with decreased hospitalization and postoperative complications. In 2014 there were performed over 9000 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and over 8500 total knee arthroplasty operations (TKA) in Denmark. During the same year Bornholm's regional hospital performed 85 THA's and 47 TKA's of these operations.
Even though the initial surgical procedure being technical and radiological satisfactory, there are a big proportion of patients who endure dissatisfaction and disability after total joint replacement (TJR) (between 20-40%). The strongest predictor for dissatisfaction after a TKA were found to be preoperative expectation not met postoperatively (10.7x greater risk). To date, there is no criterion standard for assessing the outcome of neither expectations nor satisfaction for patients undergoing TJR.
Patient's expectations are of a particular significance because they are linked to requests for elective and often costly treatments. Several studies have investigated the fulfillment of patient' expectations, however the focus has been primarily assessed by expectations regarding pain, but may also be influenced by several other factors. Patient's expectations are also strongly related to patient's assessments of outcome.
It is well established that there is a correlation between satisfaction of surgery and objective improvements in pain, function and general health-related quality of life, but just as patient' expectations the postoperative satisfaction may also incorporate multiple and varies factors that affect the overall outcome. One of these factors can be "ability to forget the artificial joint" in everyday life and can therefore be regarded as the ultimate possible goal for patient satisfaction.
Additionally, many patients undergoing TJR experience continued disability, which is largely caused by persistent pain postoperatively. Studies have shown that a high level of pain catastrophizing is a predictor of high levels of acute and persistent pain after various surgeries, and further investigation of pain catastrophizing as a predictor of outcome after TJR is warranted.
Many of the patients who experience dissatisfaction and disability after TJR do not undergo revision and present a burden for the community health clinicians and health services to continue to remedy their dissatisfaction. The rehabilitation after the initial surgery has been proven to produce short-term benefits, but these benefits does not seem to persist. As many patients' experiences limited clinical improvements postoperatively and no national consensus on the rehabilitation for this group, an optimal rehabilitation protocol for this group of patients is still warranted.
Several other associations between patient characteristics and the chance to achieve clinically importance improvements to TJR surgery have been identified as age, gender, body mass index, ethnicity, psychological distress, co-morbidity-profile and radiographic osteoarthritis severity. It can be speculated that while fast-track surgery aid to early recovery, the number of falls within the population of patients undergoing total lower limb arthroplasty will increase as a result from increased, early activities. Jørgensen \& Kehlet found the overall incidence of falls postoperatively in hip and knee replacements to be low, the inclusion of fall history may be important to optimize the rehabilitation protocol and reduce future risk of falls in this group of patients.
Patients undergoing lower TJR wish to return to pre-pathological physical status, but there has been found a limited interest in actually undertaking greater efforts in physical therapy to fully achieve this either for pleasure or health gains. Individual beliefs and perceptions presents a big factor influencing physical activity postoperatively and it is therefore important to examine this further when developing management plans aimed to optimize rehabilitation in this group of patients.
There is a dearth of literature examining the impact on actual response rates in rehabilitation after TJR surgery taken fall history, patient expectations, subjective as well as objective measurements into account. It is therefore important to clarify the relationship between these characteristics and responsiveness to postoperative rehabilitation. The available data suggest that identifying and addressing the mechanism for reduced activity and identification of the group of patients who may or may not benefit from a rehabilitation programme may be the approach needed. This data can be used to allocate already sparse resources more beneficially, and to optimise criteria for the rehabilitation intervention. An expert consensus on the best practice has already identified the need for preoperative screening to identify patients most in need for rehabilitation for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
Aim:
This project will be a descriptive, hypothesis-generating study. The aim is to identify risk factors for poor response to rehabilitation programs after TJR and use these to identify patients who are most susceptible to poor outcomes in order to optimise appropriate rehabilitations strategies and rationalising the distribution of health care resources.
Material and methods:
This project will be of a prospective cohort design where all patients who are scheduled to undergo a total joint replacement (total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty) at Bornholms regional hospital will be invited to participate. Due to the minimal effort and time required filling out the questionnaires and performing the 30sec chair stand test a minimal number of patients are expected to decline participation. Based on clinical experience the annual number of patients to undergo lower extremity TJR at Bornholm's regional hospital is expected to be around 160 patients.
During study enrolment basic, demographic data (e.g. age, gender, co-morbidities, BMI) will be collected on each participant.
Preoperative assessments (prior to surgery) and postoperative assessments (follow up at 3 months after surgery) will include:
Preoperative assessments:
* Use of joint specific analgesics and other medication
* Fall history
* Patient expectation questionnaire
* Pain catastrophizing questionnaire
* KOOS / HOOS questionnaire
* 30 second chair stand test
Postoperative assessments:
* Use of joint specific analgesics and other medication
* Fall history
* KOOS / HOOS questionnaire
* Pain catastrophizing questionnaire
* 30 second chair stand test
* The Forgotten Joint Score
* Patient satisfaction questionnaire
Approvals:
This cohort study has to obtain approval from the Danish Datatilsynet (J.nr. 2016-41-4783). This study will not change the pre or postoperative treatment of the included patients, and therefore no other formal approval is required.
Postoperative rehabilitation:
All patients are given a rehabilitation plan from the hospital to engage in a 4-12 weeks rehabilitation program in one of two rehabilitations centres located on Bornholm. The rehabilitation starts with a individual consultation with an experienced physiotherapist within 3 weeks of surgery where appropriate home-exercises are revised and instructed, and shortly after the consultation the patient is enrolled in a out-patient, group-based physical therapy program, twice weekly sessions for 4-12 weeks, where the length of the program depends on the patients objective response to the physical therapy. The patients are encouraged to continue their home-based exercises parallel to the physical therapy sessions and after the culmination of the physical therapy program. At the end of the supervised physical therapy program, the involved physiotherapist will subjectively assess each patient's compliance in regards to their exercise adherence to the rehabilitation the patients have undertaken.
Evaluation of the surgery and rehabilitation intervention is performed at the hospital 3 months after the surgery by the assigned orthopaedic surgeon, where the postoperatively outcome measurements will be recorded.
Statistical analysis:
The statistical analysis will compare preoperative and postoperative scores in terms of the use of analgesics, fall history, patient expectations / satisfaction, KOOS / HOOS, pain catastrophizing, the forgotten joint score and 30sec chair stand test. Significance will be set to \<0.05. A Chi-square test will be used to investigate whether distributions of categorical variables differ from one another. Multivariable linear regression will be performed to examine the association between patient characteristics and the response rate to TKA and THA individually and TKA/THA combined.
Even though the initial surgical procedure being technical and radiological satisfactory, there are a big proportion of patients who endure dissatisfaction and disability after total joint replacement (TJR) (between 20-40%). The strongest predictor for dissatisfaction after a TKA were found to be preoperative expectation not met postoperatively (10.7x greater risk). To date, there is no criterion standard for assessing the outcome of neither expectations nor satisfaction for patients undergoing TJR.
Patient's expectations are of a particular significance because they are linked to requests for elective and often costly treatments. Several studies have investigated the fulfillment of patient' expectations, however the focus has been primarily assessed by expectations regarding pain, but may also be influenced by several other factors. Patient's expectations are also strongly related to patient's assessments of outcome.
It is well established that there is a correlation between satisfaction of surgery and objective improvements in pain, function and general health-related quality of life, but just as patient' expectations the postoperative satisfaction may also incorporate multiple and varies factors that affect the overall outcome. One of these factors can be "ability to forget the artificial joint" in everyday life and can therefore be regarded as the ultimate possible goal for patient satisfaction.
Additionally, many patients undergoing TJR experience continued disability, which is largely caused by persistent pain postoperatively. Studies have shown that a high level of pain catastrophizing is a predictor of high levels of acute and persistent pain after various surgeries, and further investigation of pain catastrophizing as a predictor of outcome after TJR is warranted.
Many of the patients who experience dissatisfaction and disability after TJR do not undergo revision and present a burden for the community health clinicians and health services to continue to remedy their dissatisfaction. The rehabilitation after the initial surgery has been proven to produce short-term benefits, but these benefits does not seem to persist. As many patients' experiences limited clinical improvements postoperatively and no national consensus on the rehabilitation for this group, an optimal rehabilitation protocol for this group of patients is still warranted.
Several other associations between patient characteristics and the chance to achieve clinically importance improvements to TJR surgery have been identified as age, gender, body mass index, ethnicity, psychological distress, co-morbidity-profile and radiographic osteoarthritis severity. It can be speculated that while fast-track surgery aid to early recovery, the number of falls within the population of patients undergoing total lower limb arthroplasty will increase as a result from increased, early activities. Jørgensen \& Kehlet found the overall incidence of falls postoperatively in hip and knee replacements to be low, the inclusion of fall history may be important to optimize the rehabilitation protocol and reduce future risk of falls in this group of patients.
Patients undergoing lower TJR wish to return to pre-pathological physical status, but there has been found a limited interest in actually undertaking greater efforts in physical therapy to fully achieve this either for pleasure or health gains. Individual beliefs and perceptions presents a big factor influencing physical activity postoperatively and it is therefore important to examine this further when developing management plans aimed to optimize rehabilitation in this group of patients.
There is a dearth of literature examining the impact on actual response rates in rehabilitation after TJR surgery taken fall history, patient expectations, subjective as well as objective measurements into account. It is therefore important to clarify the relationship between these characteristics and responsiveness to postoperative rehabilitation. The available data suggest that identifying and addressing the mechanism for reduced activity and identification of the group of patients who may or may not benefit from a rehabilitation programme may be the approach needed. This data can be used to allocate already sparse resources more beneficially, and to optimise criteria for the rehabilitation intervention. An expert consensus on the best practice has already identified the need for preoperative screening to identify patients most in need for rehabilitation for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
Aim:
This project will be a descriptive, hypothesis-generating study. The aim is to identify risk factors for poor response to rehabilitation programs after TJR and use these to identify patients who are most susceptible to poor outcomes in order to optimise appropriate rehabilitations strategies and rationalising the distribution of health care resources.
Material and methods:
This project will be of a prospective cohort design where all patients who are scheduled to undergo a total joint replacement (total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty) at Bornholms regional hospital will be invited to participate. Due to the minimal effort and time required filling out the questionnaires and performing the 30sec chair stand test a minimal number of patients are expected to decline participation. Based on clinical experience the annual number of patients to undergo lower extremity TJR at Bornholm's regional hospital is expected to be around 160 patients.
During study enrolment basic, demographic data (e.g. age, gender, co-morbidities, BMI) will be collected on each participant.
Preoperative assessments (prior to surgery) and postoperative assessments (follow up at 3 months after surgery) will include:
Preoperative assessments:
* Use of joint specific analgesics and other medication
* Fall history
* Patient expectation questionnaire
* Pain catastrophizing questionnaire
* KOOS / HOOS questionnaire
* 30 second chair stand test
Postoperative assessments:
* Use of joint specific analgesics and other medication
* Fall history
* KOOS / HOOS questionnaire
* Pain catastrophizing questionnaire
* 30 second chair stand test
* The Forgotten Joint Score
* Patient satisfaction questionnaire
Approvals:
This cohort study has to obtain approval from the Danish Datatilsynet (J.nr. 2016-41-4783). This study will not change the pre or postoperative treatment of the included patients, and therefore no other formal approval is required.
Postoperative rehabilitation:
All patients are given a rehabilitation plan from the hospital to engage in a 4-12 weeks rehabilitation program in one of two rehabilitations centres located on Bornholm. The rehabilitation starts with a individual consultation with an experienced physiotherapist within 3 weeks of surgery where appropriate home-exercises are revised and instructed, and shortly after the consultation the patient is enrolled in a out-patient, group-based physical therapy program, twice weekly sessions for 4-12 weeks, where the length of the program depends on the patients objective response to the physical therapy. The patients are encouraged to continue their home-based exercises parallel to the physical therapy sessions and after the culmination of the physical therapy program. At the end of the supervised physical therapy program, the involved physiotherapist will subjectively assess each patient's compliance in regards to their exercise adherence to the rehabilitation the patients have undertaken.
Evaluation of the surgery and rehabilitation intervention is performed at the hospital 3 months after the surgery by the assigned orthopaedic surgeon, where the postoperatively outcome measurements will be recorded.
Statistical analysis:
The statistical analysis will compare preoperative and postoperative scores in terms of the use of analgesics, fall history, patient expectations / satisfaction, KOOS / HOOS, pain catastrophizing, the forgotten joint score and 30sec chair stand test. Significance will be set to \<0.05. A Chi-square test will be used to investigate whether distributions of categorical variables differ from one another. Multivariable linear regression will be performed to examine the association between patient characteristics and the response rate to TKA and THA individually and TKA/THA combined.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
COHORT
Study Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty
Rehabilitation, observational. Identification of risk factors for poor response to rehabilitation programs after TJR and use these to identify patients who are most susceptible to poor outcomes
Arthroplasty and postoperative rehabilitation.
Intervention Type
OTHER
Patients undergoing total knee or total hip arthroplasty and their response to postoperative rehabilitation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Arthroplasty and postoperative rehabilitation.
Patients undergoing total knee or total hip arthroplasty and their response to postoperative rehabilitation.
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty
* must be able to participate in postoperative rehabilitation
* must be able to talk and understand Danish or English
* must be able to participate in postoperative rehabilitation
* must be able to talk and understand Danish or English
Exclusion Criteria
* None
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bornholms Regionskommune
OTHER_GOV
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Troels Mark Christensen
Physiotherapist, B.Pt., M.Sc.
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Troels M. Christensen, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Bornholms Regionskommune
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Genoptræningen
Rønne, Bornholm, Denmark
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Denmark
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Aasvang EK, Luna IE, Kehlet H. Challenges in postdischarge function and recovery: the case of fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):861-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev257. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Artz N, Elvers KT, Lowe CM, Sackley C, Jepson P, Beswick AD. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise following total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 7;16:15. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0469-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, Kuster MS. The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):430-436.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Burns LC, Ritvo SE, Ferguson MK, Clarke H, Seltzer Z, Katz J. Pain catastrophizing as a risk factor for chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Pain Res. 2015 Jan 5;8:21-32. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S64730. eCollection 2015.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Collins NJ, Prinsen CA, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Terwee CB, Roos EM. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Aug;24(8):1317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Di Monaco M, Castiglioni C. Which type of exercise therapy is effective after hip arthroplasty? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Dec;49(6):893-907, quiz 921-3. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dobson F, Hinman RS, Hall M, Terwee CB, Roos EM, Bennell KL. Measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in hip and knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Dec;20(12):1548-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.015. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dobson F, Hinman RS, Roos EM, Abbott JH, Stratford P, Davis AM, Buchbinder R, Snyder-Mackler L, Henrotin Y, Thumboo J, Hansen P, Bennell KL. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Aug;21(8):1042-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 13.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dowsey MM, Gunn J, Choong PF. Selecting those to refer for joint replacement: who will likely benefit and who will not? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;28(1):157-71. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2014.01.005.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Granot M, Ferber SG. The roles of pain catastrophizing and anxiety in the prediction of postoperative pain intensity: a prospective study. Clin J Pain. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5):439-45. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000135236.12705.2d.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Harding PA, Holland AE, Hinman RS, Delany C. Physical activity perceptions and beliefs following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015 Feb;31(2):107-13. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2014.959581. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jorgensen CC, Kehlet H; Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement Collaborative Group. Fall-related admissions after fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty - cause of concern or consequence of success? Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1569-77. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S52528. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kehlet H. Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1600-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61003-X. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kjogx H, Zachariae R, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Kasch H, Svensson P, Jensen TS, Vase L. Pain frequency moderates the relationship between pain catastrophizing and pain. Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 19;5:1421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01421. eCollection 2014.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):30-3. doi: 10.1177/1403494811401482.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mancuso CA, Jout J, Salvati EA, Sculco TP. Fulfillment of patients' expectations for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Sep;91(9):2073-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01802.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME. Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997 Jun;12(4):387-96. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90194-7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Salvati EA. Patients with poor preoperative functional status have high expectations of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003 Oct;18(7):872-8. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00276-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P. Patients' expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Jul;83(7):1005-12. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200107000-00005.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nilsdotter A, Bremander A. Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Hip and Knee Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S200-7. doi: 10.1002/acr.20549. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 May 30;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-10. Epub 2003 May 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. Knee arthroplasty: are patients' expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2009 Feb;80(1):55-61. doi: 10.1080/17453670902805007.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Palazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, Boisgard S, Galvin M, Ravaud P, Poiraudeau S. Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: the role of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Feb 24;15:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-53.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pavlin DJ, Sullivan MJ, Freund PR, Roesen K. Catastrophizing: a risk factor for postsurgical pain. Clin J Pain. 2005 Jan-Feb;21(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200501000-00010.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rolfson O, Bohm E, Franklin P, Lyman S, Denissen G, Dawson J, Dunn J, Eresian Chenok K, Dunbar M, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Lubbeke A; Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries. Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis. Acta Orthop. 2016 Jul;87 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-23. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816. Epub 2016 May 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Smith TO, Latham S, Maskrey V, Blyth A. Patients' perceptions of physical activity before and after joint replacement: a systematic review with meta-ethnographic analysis. Postgrad Med J. 2015 Sep;91(1079):483-91. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133507. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Thomsen MG, Latifi R, Kallemose T, Barfod KW, Husted H, Troelsen A. Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):280-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Westby MD, Brittain A, Backman CL. Expert consensus on best practices for post-acute rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a Canada and United States Delphi study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Mar;66(3):411-23. doi: 10.1002/acr.22164.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Thomsen, M. G. (2015). Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties. A Trial Evaluating Early Component Migration by RSA and Patient Reported Outcome. Study is ongoing.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-41-4783
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Optimized Referral of Knee Patients at the Clinic of Sports Injuries
NCT02672046
COMPLETED
Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05992064
RECRUITING
The Outcome of Three Weeks Rehabilitation in Patients With a Total Hip or Knee Replacement Experiencing Persistent Physical Impairments
NCT07105657
RECRUITING
Prevalence and Incidence of Multiple Revisions Following Knee Arthroplasty in Denmark 1998-2021: A Nationwide Population-based Study
NCT06064318
COMPLETED
Risk of Serious Adverse Events Following Unsupervised vs Supervised Rehabilitation After Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07067060
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Preoperative Pain, Function, and Activity for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients
NCT01248039
COMPLETED
Failure Analysis of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty
NCT04772625
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Predicting Outcome of Total Knee Replacement Surgery in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05380648
COMPLETED
Gait Analysis and Neuromuscular Function After Primary Total Hip Replacement
NCT01229293
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Characteristics of Persistent Pain Composition Following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: a Descriptive Study
NCT07110324
RECRUITING
Prevention of Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After Acute Intraarticular Fractures
NCT03769909
UNKNOWN
The Effect of Three Prosthesis Designs in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03059927
UNKNOWN
NA
Does Rehabilitation After Total Hip Or Knee Arthroplasty Work (DRAW2)
NCT04960241
COMPLETED
NA
Why in Hospital - Factors Determining Time to Discharge Readiness After Arthroplasty Surgery
NCT01047371
COMPLETED
Cost Efficacy of a Clinical Pathway to Patients Undergoing Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery
NCT00175201
COMPLETED
NA
Knee Replacement Outcome Predicted by Physiotherapists
NCT02982785
COMPLETED
Cardiovascular Changes and Changes in Tissue Oxygenation During Early Postoperative Mobilization in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Patients
NCT01089946
COMPLETED
The Fast-track Centre for Hip and Knee Replacement Database
NCT05613439
RECRUITING
Observational Study of Total Ankle Arthroplasty and Tibiotalar Arthrodesis
NCT02025946
WITHDRAWN
Prediction of Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02254499
COMPLETED
Total Knee Arthroplasty - Accelerated Recovery Without Tourniquet
NCT01309035
COMPLETED
NA
Retrospective Evaluation of Clinical and Functional Results and Survivorship of Total Knee Replacement and Total Hip Replacement, Both Isolated or Combined.
NCT04199377
UNKNOWN
NA
Safety of Total Knee Replacement Surgery Before and After the Implementation of Enhanced Recovery Program
NCT05028426
COMPLETED
Surgery Induced Trauma After Total Versus Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (SITA)
NCT05735847
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING